· Private foundation
The Vernon K Krieble Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $120k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOPKINS SCHOOL | $45,000 |
| KINGSWOOD OXFORD SCHOOL INC | $40,000 |
| MISFIT ISLAND INC | $25,000 |
| SMILES FOREVER ANIMAL RESCUE | $10,000 |
| SAM & ELIZABETH COLT MUSEUM | $5,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA TRUSTEES | $5,000 |
| HARVARD UNIVERSITY | $2,500 |
| LOOMIS CHAFFEE SCHOOL | $2,500 |
| EAGLE WEST CAP STRATEGIC OPERATOR ACCESS FUND LP K-1 | $19 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
19 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KOKINGSWOOD OXFORD SCHOOL INC6× · 2019–2024 · $137k · revenue +29%
THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2021 · $35k · revenue +12%- SFSMILES FOREVER ANIMAL RESCUE AND SANCTUA3× · 2021–2024 · $30k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- ANATLAS NETWORKone grant, 2022 · $100k
- FGFLORENCE GRISWOLD MUSEUM INCone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +15%
- EFENCOUNTER FOR CULTURE AND EDUCATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue +224%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…
Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…
The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.
The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Dedicated to learning, personal growth, knowledge creation, and the betterment of society. the university engages students in aquiring the knowledge, skills, and values necessary to thrive in and contribute to a pluralistic, complex world.
Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Angelo S Carrabba Md Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Leadership Program of the Rockies ↗
- Who funds KINGSWOOD OXFORD SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds FLORENCE GRISWOLD MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds YANKEE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY ↗
- Who funds HOPKINS SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds ENCOUNTER FOR CULTURE AND EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds UNLEASH PROSPERITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE SAM & ELIZABETH COLT HERITAGE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Bill of Rights Institute ↗
- Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SMILES FOREVER ANIMAL RESCUE AND SANCTUA ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES ↗
- Who funds THE LOOMIS INSTITUTE D/B/A THE LOOMIS CHAFFEE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds ANGELO S CARRABBA MD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Incarnation Center Inc ↗
- Who funds WOODSON CENTER ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds GOODSPEED OPERA HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT FOREST & PARK ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BEACON CENTER OF TENNESSEE ↗
- Who funds FARMINGTON RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SQUASHSMARTS INC ↗
- Who funds DIGNITY GROWS INC ↗
- Who funds Capitol Squash Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Donors Trust Inc · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Ibm International Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · The Vincent Dowling Family Foundation Inc · The John G Martin Foundation · Thomas W Smith Foundation Inc · Adolph Coors Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Vernon K Krieble Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Farmington River Watershed Association Inc — 69% of income from government
- Connecticut Forest & Park Association — 16% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Connecticut Children's Medical Center — 5% of income from government
- Florence Griswold Museum Inc — 2% of income from government
- Incarnation Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Goodspeed Opera House Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Kingswood Oxford School Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.