Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Vanderbilt Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$358k
Granted FY2026still arriving
22
Grants FY2026still arriving
9
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Education$694kEnvironment$430kPublic Benefit$265kInternational$229kHuman Services$207kFood & Nutrition$120kCivil Rights$97kAnimals$90kOther$0
02FY2026 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k10 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $127k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $175k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION$70,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC$55,000
CHILDRENS STOREFRONT$50,000
NEIGHBORS LINK$22,000
PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT$20,000
WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST$15,000
PUBLIC CITIZEN FOUNDATION$12,500
TENNESSEE JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS$12,500
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS$12,500
PRISM$12,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$10,000
IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE$10,000
CONNECTICUT FARMLAND TRUST$9,400
APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN CLUB$8,000
FIRST LITERACY$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–26, $106k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SUNFLOWER OF PEACE: $15k → 8%NEIGHBORS LINK: $22k → 9%TENNESSEE JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS: $13k → 14%ONE SIMPLE WISH: $13k → 11%NEIGHBORS LINK: $12k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK: $11k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK: $9k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK: $7k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
ID
IL
NY
MA
IN
NJ
CT
CA
VA
TN
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 38 repeat orgs$492k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2026, 23 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
29

Total granted

$2.2M
$348k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
0%

Still filing today

74%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $144k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EnvironmentInternationalCivil RightsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WI
    WADE INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $338k · revenue +56%
  • TC
    THE CHILDRENS STOREFRONT
    6× · 2020–2026 · $329k · revenue +12%
  • CF
    Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc
    8× · 2017–2026 · $84k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • SHELBURNE FARMS
    one grant, 2025 · $58k · revenue 0%
  • FI
    Fuse Innovation Fund
    one grant, 2020 · $35k · revenue -45%
  • SP
    SEEDS PROGRAMS INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2017 · $32k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
3
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
4
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
5
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
6
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
7
Grist Magazine Inc

Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.

Environment
8
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
9
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
10
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
11
Amazon Watch Inc

To protect the rainforest and advance the rights of Indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with Indigenous communities in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability, and the preservation of the Amazon Basin's…

Environment
12
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Democracy Forward Foundation; the most unlike its peers is South Bay Families Connected. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/53
Grantees still filing
35/53
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WADE INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION INC: $338,000 · OtherWADE INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION INCTHE CHILDRENS STOREFRONT: $329,000 · OtherTHE CHILDRENS STOREFRONTIndividual grant recipient: $125,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOMMON POWER FUTURE: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $59,334 · OtherNORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $58,438 · OtherIDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC: $58,000 · OtherDING DARLING WILDLIFE SOCIETY INC: $65,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $67,000 · Other+36 more: $490,637 · Other+36 moreAppalachian Mountain Club: $68,332 · EnvironmentAppalachian Mo…Fuse Washington: $60,000 · EnvironmentFuse Washingto…SHELBURNE FARMS: $58,000 · EnvironmentSHELBURNE FARM…WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO: $57,000 · EnvironmentWOOD RIVER LAN…SANIBEL-CAPTIVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $38,500 · EnvironmentSANIBEL-CAPTIV…Fuse Innovation Fund: $35,000 · EnvironmentFuse Innovatio…THE DIGDEEP RIGHT TO WATER PROJECT: $17,000 · Environment+2 more: $12,000 · EnvironmentCOMMON POWER FUTURE: $72,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 · Civil RightsPROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT: $20,000 · Civil RightsCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC: $12,500 · Civil RightsPRISM FL INC: $12,500 · Civil Rights+1 more: $2,000 · Civil RightsTHE LAMBI FUND OF HAITI: $65,000 · InternationalSEED PROGRAMS INC: $32,000 · InternationalThe American Himalayan Foundation: $23,500 · InternationalVILLAGE HEALTH WORKS: $20,000 · InternationalWORLD ASSISTANCE FOR CAMBODIA INC: $16,830 · InternationalHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $12,000 · InternationalNEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $65,583 · Human ServicesSUNFLOWER OF PEACE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesTENNESSEE JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS: $12,500 · Human ServicesONE SIMPLE WISH INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesConnecticut Farmland Trust Inc: $84,338 · Food & NutritionBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC: $9,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $9,000 · Food & NutritionDEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION: $70,000 · Crime & LegalINSIDEOUT WRITERS INC: $9,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,665,909Environment$345,832Civil Rights$189,000International$169,330Human Services$105,583Food & Nutrition$102,338Crime & Legal$79,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWADE INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION INC: $338,000 over 6y, 8.4% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS STOREFRONT: $329,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetConnecticut Farmland Trust Inc: $84,338 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetCOMMON POWER FUTURE: $72,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAppalachian Mountain Club: $68,332 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $67,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $65,583 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDING DARLING WILDLIFE SOCIETY INC: $65,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetTHE LAMBI FUND OF HAITI: $65,000 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetFuse Washington: $60,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetNORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $58,438 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetIDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC: $58,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetSHELBURNE FARMS: $58,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO: $57,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetROOT CAUSE FARM INC: $43,644 over 5y, 6.6% of budgetSANIBEL-CAPTIVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $38,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFuse Innovation Fund: $35,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSouth Bay Families Connected: $33,332 over 4y, 11% of budgetSEED PROGRAMS INC: $32,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetAPPRENTICE LEARNING INC: $28,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetThe American Himalayan Foundation: $23,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetKICKSTART INTERNATIONAL INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetVILLAGE HEALTH WORKS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DIGDEEP RIGHT TO WATER PROJECT: $17,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD ASSISTANCE FOR CAMBODIA INC: $16,830 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTHE SEGUE FOUNDATION INC: $16,000 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetSUNFLOWER OF PEACE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFIRST LITERACY INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetWood River Community Young Men's Christian Association Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetONE SIMPLE WISH INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $11,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChristodora Inc: $9,061 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC: $9,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetINSIDEOUT WRITERS INC: $9,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFeeding America: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRADES OF GREEN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAVIAN HAVEN: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLEARNING RIGHTS LAW CENTER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCobscook Community Learning Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WADE INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDRENS STOREFRONT ↗
  • Who funds Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMON POWER FUTURE ↗
  • Who funds DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Appalachian Mountain Club ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORS LINK CORP ↗
  • Who funds DING DARLING WILDLIFE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LAMBI FUND OF HAITI ↗
  • Who funds Fuse Washington ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELBURNE FARMS ↗
  • Who funds WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO ↗
  • Who funds ROOT CAUSE FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds SANIBEL-CAPTIVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Fuse Innovation Fund ↗
  • Who funds South Bay Families Connected ↗
  • Who funds SEED PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds APPRENTICE LEARNING INC ↗
  • Who funds The American Himalayan Foundation ↗
  • Who funds KICKSTART INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE HEALTH WORKS ↗
  • Who funds THE DIGDEEP RIGHT TO WATER PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds WORLD ASSISTANCE FOR CAMBODIA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEGUE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNFLOWER OF PEACE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST LITERACY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

ImpactassetsincMD15.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Impactassetsinc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Annenberg Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · California Community Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Tides Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Vanderbilt Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Vanderbilt Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Sanibel-Captiva Conservation Foundation: 4% of income from government
  • Shelburne Farms: 3% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club: 1% of income from government
  • The Community Music School Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Vanderbilt Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Vanderbilt Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Vanderbilt Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph