Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Valentine Family Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.3M
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Health$14MEducation$5.5MAnimals$300kArts & Culture$125k
02FY2021 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,300,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUCILLE PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$1,300,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 10% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ARIZONA OPERA: $25k → 11%LUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $2.0M → 8%JOHN MUIR HEALTH FOUNDATION: $505k → 9%SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY: $100k → 10%LUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $2.0M → 8%JOHN MUIR HEALTH FOUNDATION: $500k → 9%SAN FRANCISCO ZOO: $300k → 10%LUCILLE PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $1.3M → 8%JOHN MUIR HEALTH FOUNDATION: $500k → 9%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $1.3M → 8%LUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $918k → 8%EASTSIDE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $567k → 8%EASTSIDE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $76k → 8%EASTSIDE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $76k → 8%EASTSIDE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $76k → 8%BREAST CANCER CONNECTIONS: $50k → 8%CANARY FOUNDATION: $1.3M → 8%CANARY FOUNDATION: $1.3M → 8%CANARY FOUNDATION: $492k → 8%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $385k → 8%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $125k → 8%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $25k → 8%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $25k → 8%CANARY FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $2.5M → 8%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $917k → 8%STANFORD ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH CENTER: $810k → 8%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION - PART THE CLOUD: $1.0M → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 6 repeat orgs$3.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +139% since the first grant, against -28% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2021, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
6

Total granted

$12M
$2.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+139%
-28%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
HealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LP
    LUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    3× · 2018–2020 · $4.9M
  • TC
    THE CANARY FUND DBA CANARY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $3.1M · revenue -20% · 48% of their budget
  • JM
    JOHN MUIR HEALTH FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2020 · $1.5M · revenue +139%

Funded once

  • AA
    ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION - PART THE CLOUD
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M
  • SA
    STANFORD ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $810k
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2020 · $300k · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
4
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
5
Ucsf Health Medical Foundation

See schedule othe mission of ucsf health medical foundation is threefold: 1) to establish, operate and maintain medical clinics for the provision of healthcare services in california; 2) to promote health by providing, coordinating,…

Health
6
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
7
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
8
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
10
Opera Santa Barbara

See schedule 0founded in 1994, opera santa barbara is the signature provider of professional opera on the california central coast. we aspire to be a cultural leader in the santa barbara region, voicing and advancing our community's spirit…

Arts & Culture
11
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
12
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Francisco Symphony; the most unlike its peers is The Canary Fund Dba Canary Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $4,937,358 · OtherLUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITALLUCILLE PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $1,300,000 · OtherLUCILLE PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITALUCSF: $1,100,000 · OtherUCSFALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION - PART THE CLOUD: $1,000,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION - PART THE CLOUDSTANFORD ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH CENTER: $810,000 · OtherSTANFORD ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH CENTERRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $560,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSETHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $4,674,127 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE L…EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $795,000 · EducationEASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY S…THE CANARY FUND DBA CANARY FOUNDATION: $3,066,213 · PhilanthropyTHE CANARY FUND D…JOHN MUIR HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1,504,889 · Health+1 more: $50,000 · HealthSAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $300,000 · AnimalsSAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY: $100,000 · Arts & CultureARIZONA OPERA COMPANY: $25,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$9,707,358Education$5,469,127Philanthropy$3,066,213Health$1,554,889Animals$300,000Arts & Culture$125,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $4,674,127 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CANARY FUND DBA CANARY FOUNDATION: $3,066,213 over 4y, 48% of budgetJOHN MUIR HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1,504,889 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetEASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $795,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $300,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAY AREA CANCER CONNECTIONS: $50,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetARIZONA OPERA COMPANY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE CANARY FUND DBA CANARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOHN MUIR HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA CANCER CONNECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA OPERA COMPANY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Valentine Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Valentine Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Valentine Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Valentine Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Valentine Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph