Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Unaka Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$161k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Animals$141kEducation$123kHuman Services$24kHealth$20kFood & Nutrition$8kPhilanthropy$8kYouth Development$3kInternational$707Other$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$950
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$100,030
Individual grant recipient$25,000
GREENE COUNTY YMCA$15,000
UT FOUNDATION - MATCHING CONTRIBUTION$5,250
AIDNET OF GREENE COUNTY - MATCHING CONTRIBUTION$4,050
GREENE COUNTY IMAGINATION LIBRARY$2,500
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$2,500
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENEVILLE$2,500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY - MATCHING CONTRIBUTION$1,971
CEDAR CREEK MISSION & OUTREACH - MATCHING CONTRIBUTION$950
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL - MATCHING CONTRIBUTION$336
UNITED WAY OF GREENE COUNTY - MATCHING CONTRIBUTION$240
AMERICAN RED CROSS - MATCHING CONTRIBUTION$103
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$100
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION - MATCHING CONTRIBUTION$53
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENEVILLE: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
IA
CA
CO
VA
TN
NC
SC
HI
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$206k · 9 repeat orgs$321k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
13

Total granted

$206k
$209k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+6%

Still filing today

33%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $112k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsEnvironmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2022–2025 · $100k
  • LP
    LINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    2× · 2022–2024 · $55k · revenue -21%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREENE COUNTY
    2× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue -4%

Funded once

  • GC
    GREENEVILLE CITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $117k · revenue -61% · 59% of their budget
  • GC
    GREENE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2023 · $59k
  • LC
    LMU COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE - SCHOLARSHIPS
    one grant, 2022 · $27k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feed Your Neighbor Community Food Pantry Inc

To distribute emergency food assistance to individuals and families in the greenville area, and to cooperate with partnering agencies so that recipients have access to the greatest number of nutritional resources.

Food & Nutrition
2
Greeneville Greene County Community Ministries Food Bank

To enlist and provide ecumenical Christian support for program and longer term assistance with food, shelter, utlities, and medications for residents of Greeneville and Greene County.

Human Services
3
Second Harvest Food Bank of Northwest Nc Inc

To provide food assistance through a network of partners, while educating and engaging our communities in the elimination of hunger and its causes.

Food & Nutrition
4
Food Bank of Greenwood County

The mission of the food bank of greenwood county is to reduce hunger through community cooperation, effectively distributing donated grocery products and perishable foods, and making the best possible use of all available resources.

Food & Nutrition
5
Greenfield Area Christian Center

Christian youth organization founded to promote christian beliefs in the youth of the community.

Religion
6
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
7
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
8
God's Pantry Food Bank Inc

The mission of god's pantry food bank is reducing hunger by working together to feed kentucky communities. god's pantry food bank envisions a nourished life for every kentuckian.

—
9
Greensboro Postal Credit Union

Providing credit union services to members

—
10
Ymca of Greenville

The mission of the ymca of greenville, following the example of christ, is to build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. we reach out to accomplish this mission through eight ymca locations: five are family branches, one - judson…

Human Services
11
Greater Lansing Food Bank

Partner to alleviate hunger one meal at a time, to create a future where everyone has access to nourishing food.

Food & Nutrition
12
Golden Corner Food Pantry

To provide emergency and supplemental food to disadvantaged and low income residents of oconee county, south carolina.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Men's Christian Association of Greene County; the most unlike its peers is Greene County Imagination Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $100,030 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGREENE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $58,900 · OtherGREENE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETYLMU COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE - SCHOLARSHIPS: $26,720 · OtherLMU COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE - SCHOLARSHIPSYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREENE COUNTY: $20,000 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREENE COUNTYAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY - MATCHING CONTRIBUTION: $15,697 · Other+17 more: $18,136 · Other+17 moreGREENEVILLE CITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $116,600 · EducationGREENEVILLE CITY SCHOOLS F…GREENE COUNTY IMAGINATION LIBRARY: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $26 · EducationLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $55,000 · AnimalsLINCOLN PAR…AIDNET OF GREENE COUNTY INC: $4,050 · Human ServicesBoys and Girls Club of Greeneville & Greene County: $2,500 · Human Services+1 more: $25 · Human ServicesRural Resources: $2,500 · EnvironmentHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $1,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $100 · Religion
Other$339,483Education$121,626Animals$55,000Human Services$6,575Environment$2,500Food & Nutrition$2,000Religion$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREENEVILLE CITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $116,600 over 1y, 59% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $55,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREENE COUNTY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetGREENE COUNTY IMAGINATION LIBRARY: $5,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetRural Resources: $2,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREENEVILLE CITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREENE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds GREENE COUNTY IMAGINATION LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds AIDNET OF GREENE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Rural Resources ↗
  • Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Greeneville & Greene County ↗
  • Who funds HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds IVY PEARL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ISAIAH 117 HOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Tennessee FoundationTN15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Tennessee Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Unaka Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Unaka Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Unaka Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Unaka Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Unaka’s filings →

    More from the funding graph