Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Umakant S & Shreedevi U Doctor Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$115k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$193kFood & Nutrition$182kInternational$132kHuman Services$86kHousing & Shelter$84kRecreation & Sports$75kArts & Culture$51kEnvironment$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $95k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$886k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOAVES & FISHES$10,000
FEEDING AMERICA$10,000
ACTION AGAINST HUNGER$5,000
JACOBS-KUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK$5,000
LOS ANGELES FOOD BANK$5,000
PRISON YOGA PROJECT$5,000
HEALTHY HEARTS INSTITUTE$5,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$5,000
SALT LAKE CLIMBERS ASSOCIATION$5,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$5,000
UTAH FOOD BANK$5,000
NO KID HUNGRY$5,000
REFUGEE INTERNATIONAL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $100 → 10%HOSPITALITY HOUSE: $5k → 12%HOSPITALITY HOUSE: $5k → 12%HOSPICE CARE OF SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN: $5k → 12%HOSPICE CARE OF SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN: $5k → 12%HOSPITALITY HOUSE: $5k → 12%HOSPICE CARE OF SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN: $3k → 12%THE INN BETWEEN: $5k → 8%THE INN BETWEEN: $5k → 8%THE INN BETWEEN: $5k → 8%THE INN BETWEEN: $5k → 8%THE INN BETWEEN: $2k → 8%THE INN BETWEEN: $2k → 8%CHARITY WATER: $3k → 17%THE INN BETWEEN: $1k → 8%HOSPICE CARE OF SW MICHIGAN: $3k → 12%HOSPICE CARE OF SW MICHIGAN: $3k → 12%HOSPICE CARE OF SW MICHIGAN: $3k → 12%HOSPICE CARE OF SW MICHIGAN: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MD
AR
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$764k · 45 repeat orgs$162k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

45 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
37

Total granted

$764k
$141k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+3%

Still filing today

62%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $55k · revenue +98%
  • PY
    Prison Yoga Project Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $41k · revenue +180%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $40k · revenue +127%

Funded once

  • TF
    TRIBHUVANDAS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $35k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
2
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
Rise Against Hunger Inc

Rise against hunger, inc. is an international hunger relief non-profit organization that is driven by a vision of a world without hunger and a mission to end hunger in our lifetime. rise against hunger distributes food and other…

International
5
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
6
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
7
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
8
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
9
Partnership for a Healthier America Inc

Advancing equitable access to nutritious food for all in America to lead healthy lives.

Youth Development
10
Handicap International

Handicap international dba humanity & inclusion (hi) works with people with disabilities and people living in situations of vulnerability, including poverty, exclusion, conflict, and disaster.

International
11
Pact Inc

Pact is a nonprofit organization that builds evidence-based, data-driven, and community-led solutions for human development (continued in schedule o)

International
12
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa; the most unlike its peers is The Breakfast Revolution. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/49
Grantees still filing
31/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Prison Yoga Project Inc: $41,000 · OtherPrison Yoga Project IncHOSPITAL HOSPITALITY HOUSE: $35,000 · OtherHOSPITAL HOSPITALITY HOUSETRIBHUVANDAS FOUNDATION: $35,000 · OtherTRIBHUVANDAS FOUNDATIONSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $32,000 · OtherSHARE OUR STRENGTHLOAVES & FISHES: $30,000 · OtherLOAVES & FISHESREFUGEE INTERNATIONAL: $20,000 · OtherKalamazoo Institute of Arts: $25,000 · Other+50 more: $277,883 · Other+50 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $55,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FR…International Rescue Committee INC: $28,000 · InternationalInternational Re…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $20,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KI…PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $10,000 · InternationalPALESTINE CHILDR…THE BREAKFAST REVOLUTION: $7,000 · InternationalACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $5,000 · InternationalTHE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT: $5,000 · InternationalGroundswell International Inc: $5,000 · International+2 more: $1,500 · InternationalTHE INN BETWEEN: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE INN B…Hospice Care of Southwest Michigan: $25,000 · Human ServicesHospice C…HOSPITALITY HOUSE: $15,000 · Human ServicesHOSPITALI…SIMPLY THE BASICS: $10,000 · Human ServicesSIMPLY TH…CHARITY GLOBAL INC: $3,000 · Human Services+2 more: $2,100 · Human ServicesMaliheh Free Clinic: $25,000 · HealthRonald McDonald House Global: $20,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $12,300 · HealthSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $5,500 · HealthHealthy Hearts Institute: $5,000 · Health+3 more: $3,200 · HealthFeeding America: $40,000 · Food & NutritionKALAMAZOO LOAVES & FISHES INC: $28,000 · Food & NutritionHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterKALAMAZOO VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterSALT LAKE CLIMBERS ALLIANCE INC: $25,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$495,883International$136,500Human Services$80,100Health$71,000Food & Nutrition$68,000Housing & Shelter$50,000Recreation & Sports$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $55,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPrison Yoga Project Inc: $41,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $40,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetFeeding America: $40,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $32,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKALAMAZOO LOAVES & FISHES INC: $28,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $28,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMaliheh Free Clinic: $25,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE INN BETWEEN: $25,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSALT LAKE CLIMBERS ALLIANCE INC: $25,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetHospice Care of Southwest Michigan: $25,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKalamazoo Institute of Arts: $25,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPITALITY HOUSE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF UTAH AVALANCHE FORE CAST CENTER INC: $14,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $12,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $10,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKALAMAZOO VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSIMPLY THE BASICS: $10,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAKFAST REVOLUTION: $7,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHY ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE OF UTAH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHealthy Hearts Institute: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSHELTER TO SOLDIER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH PHYSICIANS FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSENIOR SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGroundswell International Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALING CENTERS: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLava Mae: $3,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGIVE BACK YOGA FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUnited Help Ukraine Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREVENTION WORKS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAsha for Education: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRELIEF INTERNATIONAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHomeless Prenatal Program Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC ADVOCATES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Prison Yoga Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds Maliheh Free Clinic ↗
  • Who funds THE INN BETWEEN ↗
  • Who funds SALT LAKE CLIMBERS ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Hospice Care of Southwest Michigan ↗
  • Who funds Kalamazoo Institute of Arts ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
  • Who funds HOSPITALITY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UTAH AVALANCHE FORE CAST CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds SIMPLY THE BASICS ↗
  • Who funds PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAKFAST REVOLUTION ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kalamazoo Community FoundationMI21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kalamazoo Community Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · The Burdick-Thorne Foundation · Tyler-Little Family Foundation · Dorothy U Dalton Foundation Inc · Harold and Grace Upjohn Foundation · Irving S Gilmore Foundation · Marvin and Rosalie Okun Foundation · The Ronda E Stryker and William D Johnston Foundation · United Way of South Central Michigan · John E Fetzer Institute Inc · Molitor Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Umakant S & Shreedevi U Doctor Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Umakant S & Shreedevi U Doctor Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Umakant S & Shreedevi U Doctor Family Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to The Umakant S & Shreedevi U Doctor Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Umakant S & Shreedevi U Doctor Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph