Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Tzedaka Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$103k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$103k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$122kPhilanthropy$64kHuman Services$19kFood & Nutrition$8kInternational$1kArts & Culture$860Public Safety & Disaster$850Health$478Other$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$102,608
Median grant
1
States reached
$150k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS CHARITIES$102,608
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $7k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $5k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $2k → 6%ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $432 → 6%ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $101 → 6%ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $72 → 6%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $54 → 20%FRIENDS OF MOHOROSH INC: $500 → 13%DOROT: $36 → 17%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $54 → 6%FRIENDS OF MOHOROSH INC: $150 → 13%OHEL CHILDRENS HOME AND FAMILY: $54 → 20%KEREN ANIYIM INC: $500 → 20%A TIME: $72 → 20%KEREN ANIYIM INC: $300 → 20%KIMPATORIN AID INC: $36 → 20%KIMPATORIN AID INC: $36 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$524k · 73 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

73 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 72 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

73
74

Total granted

$524k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+9%

Still filing today

29%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyReligionFood & NutritionHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DM
    DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $14k · revenue +316%
  • TS
    TOMCHEI SHABBOS-YAD YESHAYA INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $7k · revenue +85%
  • CH
    CHEVRA HATZALAH OF THE ROCKAWAYS AND NASSAU COUNTY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $850 · revenue ×30,367

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CHASDEI LEV
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +23%
  • CS
    CONGREGATION SUPPORTERS OF TORAH INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
3
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
4
Chasdei Yetev Lev Inc

Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.

—
5
Sherit Isroel
—
6
Yeshivat Leluv of Jerusalem Inc

Charitable work to help people in need

—
7
Mishken Chaim Rivnits

Assistance to the indigent

Religion
8
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
9
Yad Chaim Inc

Providing support for families in need of food for the sabbath and holidays

Human Services
10
Friends of Bikur Cholim Ezrat Achim

To support the charitable activities of the organization ezrat achim in the city of beit shemesh, israel.

International
11
Zichron Meshilem Feish Inc

Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations

—
12
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Project Raanana. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 148 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/42
Grantees still filing
30/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS CHARITIES: $309,120 · OtherVARIOUS CHARITIES+117 more: $176,217 · Other+117 morePARTNERS CHARITY FUND FOR ISRAEL: $60,500 · PhilanthropyPARTNERS CHA…+5 more: $1,866 · PhilanthropyDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $14,162 · Human ServicesKEREN ANIYIM INC: $800 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF MOHOROSH INC: $650 · Human ServicesACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $605 · Human Services+5 more: $288 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF CHASDEI LEV: $7,500 · ReligionNoam Shabbos Inc: $575 · Religion+4 more: $462 · ReligionTOMCHEI SHABBOS-YAD YESHAYA INC: $6,600 · Food & NutritionMASBIA: $748 · Food & NutritionEzras Cholim Yad Ephraim Inc: $504 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $234 · Food & NutritionCHEVRA HATZALAH OF THE ROCKAWAYS AND NASSAU COUNTY: $850 · Civil RightsJUST ONE LIFE INC: $216 · InternationalKolel Shomre Hachomos of Jerusalem Inc: $162 · InternationalFRIENDS OF PROJECT RAANANA: $126 · InternationalCARMEI HA'IR INTERNATIONAL: $36 · International
Other$485,337Philanthropy$62,366Human Services$16,505Religion$8,537Food & Nutrition$8,086Civil Rights$850International$540

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARTNERS CHARITY FUND FOR ISRAEL: $60,500 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $14,162 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF CHASDEI LEV: $7,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTOMCHEI SHABBOS-YAD YESHAYA INC: $6,600 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $2,313 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FLATBUSH COMMUNITY FUND INC co BERNATH & ROSENBERG PC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHEVRA HATZALAH OF THE ROCKAWAYS AND NASSAU COUNTY: $850 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetKEREN ANIYIM INC: $800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMASBIA: $748 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF MOHOROSH INC: $650 over 2y, 11% of budgetACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $605 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNoam Shabbos Inc: $575 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPaamonim: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEzras Cholim Yad Ephraim Inc: $504 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $252 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHUVU RETURN INC: $244 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBNAI RAPHAEL CHESED ORGANIZATION IN: $234 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJUST ONE LIFE INC: $216 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKolel Shomre Hachomos of Jerusalem Inc: $162 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME: $144 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF PROJECT RAANANA: $126 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA BETH ABRAHAM OF JERUSALEM INC: $126 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSimchas Yom Tov Inc: $108 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOUR PLACE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF FLATBUSH NEFESH CHA: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGUARDIANS OF THE SICK INC: $72 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIMPATORIN AID INC: $72 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $72 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOhel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LMAN ACHAI INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOROT INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Rachashei Lev Whispers of The Heart: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEV MALKA INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARMEI HA'IR INTERNATIONAL: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PARTNERS CHARITY FUND FOR ISRAEL ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CHASDEI LEV ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHEI SHABBOS-YAD YESHAYA INC ↗
  • Who funds YESODOS INC ↗
  • Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds THE FLATBUSH COMMUNITY FUND INC co BERNATH & ROSENBERG PC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY51.1× affinity39 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Nathan and Marilyn Silberman Fdn · Jewish Communal Fund · The Margules Foundation Inc · The Basch Family Foundation · The Reich Family Charitable Trust · Yisroel Aryeh and Leib Foundation · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · The Jmg Foundation · Gertrude and Morris Bienenfeld Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Tzedaka Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Tzedaka Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Tzedaka Fund?

    Find your warmest path to The Tzedaka Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 148 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tzedaka’s filings →

    More from the funding graph