Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Turo Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$23kHuman Services$18kEducation$17kInternational$10kReligion$5kPhilanthropy$4kHealth$3kCrime & Legal$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$147k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KUANDE TRIBAL COUNCIL$8,280
Individual grant recipient$5,300
CAFLC$1,000
KUANDE CHURCH PROJECT$580
VAIOUS CHARITABLE ORGS- 500$450
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 75% of grant dollars ($69k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 25% that went abroad ($23k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MATHEW 25: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 25% of all-years giving ($23k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
South Africa$12k · 5 grants
Benin$11k · 3 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 33% of The Turo Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 74% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 43%.

The Turo Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 36% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$66k · 11 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
16

Total granted

$66k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+94%
+146%

Still filing today

18%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • V
    VARIOUS
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k
  • KT
    KOUANDE TRIBAL COUNCIL
    5× · 2017–2021 · $12k
  • TH
    TRINITY HIGH SCHOOL
    4× · 2017–2021 · $11k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • SP
    ST PATRICK SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • VC
    VAIOUS CHARITABLE ENTITIES- 500
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Upmc Carlisle

Upmc carlisle's mission is to serve the community by providing access to outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health care system through clinical and technological innovation, research and education.

Health
2
Pocono Health System

We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.

—
3
Upmc Pinnacle

Upmc pinnacle (a.k.a., upmc in central pa.) is a division of upmc. upmc is a world-renowned nonprofit health care provider and insurer with 100,000 employees-including more than 5,000 physicians-caring for patients across more than 40…

Health
4
Monongahela Valley Hospital Inc

The mission of penn highlands mon valley is to enhance the health of the residents of the mid-monongahela valley area by providing outstanding healthcare services.

Health
5
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
6
Carbondale Public Library

Public lending library

—
7
Adamstown Area Library

The mission of the adamstown library is to maintain and improve the quality of life in our community by providing access to cultural, intellectual, and informational resources and programs to promote life-long learning for all ages. the…

Education
8
Upmc Western Maryland Corporation

The mission of upmc western maryland is to serve our community by providing outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health system through clinical & technological innovation, research and education.

Health
9
Upmc Pinnacle Lancaster

Upmc lancaster's mission while in operation as a charitable organization was dedicated to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
10
Chester County Hospital & Health System

The provision of management services to the chester county hospital and its affiliates.

Health
11
Community Life Team

To provide community-based, efficient, and cost-effective emergency medical transport services, pre-hospital ems (emergency medical services) for the residents and communities of the central pa region. community life team strives to be the…

Health
12
Susquehanna Physician Services

Susquehanna physician services is a subsidiary of the exempt entity upmc suquehanna. our vision is to create an integrated community health system that delivers world class care. our values are to carefully place our patients and their…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Matthew 25; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan Fellowship. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS: $15,421 · OtherVARIOUSKOUANDE TRIBAL COUNCIL: $11,933 · OtherKOUANDE TRIBAL COUNCILTRINITY HIGH SCHOOL: $11,000 · OtherTRINITY HIGH SCHOOLKUANDE TRIBAL COUNCIL: $10,412 · OtherKUANDE TRIBAL COUNCILIndividual grant recipient: $10,350 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST PATRICK SCHOOL: $4,600 · OtherVAIOUS CHARITABLE ENTITIES- 500: $2,954 · Other+17 more: $11,015 · Other+17 moreUPMC PINNACLE FOUNDATION: $2,794 · HealthSADLER HEALTH CENTER CORPORATION: $100 · HealthCUMBERLAND COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION: $500 · EducationMATTHEW 25: $500 · Human ServicesPENNON ORGANIZATION: $200 · Arts & Culture
Other$87,685Health$2,894Education$500Human Services$500Arts & Culture$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUPMC PINNACLE FOUNDATION: $2,794 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARLISLE AREA FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $800 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCUMBERLAND COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN FELLOWSHIP: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMATTHEW 25: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMELIA S GIVIN FREE LIBRARY: $415 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPENNON ORGANIZATION: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSADLER HEALTH CENTER CORPORATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UPMC PINNACLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CARLISLE AREA FAMILY LIFE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CUMBERLAND COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN FELLOWSHIP ↗
  • Who funds MATTHEW 25 ↗
  • Who funds AMELIA S GIVIN FREE LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds PENNON ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds SADLER HEALTH CENTER CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Carlisle & Cumberland CountyPA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Carlisle & Cumberland County · Partnership for Better Health · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Turo Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Turo Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Turo’s filings →

    More from the funding graph