Loading…
Loading…
· Public charity
Raising funds in the huntington area for distribution to carefully chosen local non-profit agencies that provide vital health and human services to community members in need, improving the quality and availability of services in the town of huntington.
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 100% of THE TOWNWIDE FUND OF HUNTINGTON INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to empower older adults to enhance purpose and well-being through a portfolio of innovative health care services.
Home health services of wjcs is a ny state licensed home care service agency, hhs provides the highest quality services supporting older adults in aging in place while maintaining independence and preserving their dignity.
To provide certified home care and care management services.
Our mission is to empower older adults to enhance purpose and well-being through a portfolio of innovative health care services.
Vna home health services' mission is to improve the quality of their patients' lives by providing compassionate services that support care, comfort and independence.
To support the delivery of health care services to patients in the new york metropolitan area.
To provide health care services
LIJMC strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality of care for the community regardless of ability to pay.
Our mission is to empower older adults to enhance purpose and well-being through a portfolio of innovative health care services.
To promote and enhance the quality and accesibility of health care and support at home.
To establish and maintain, within the state of new york, a residential health care facility, to provide care to the frail, elderly and other individuals requiring skilled nursing care and/or restorative rehabilitation. to carry on…
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Service League Inc and the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels of Huntington Township Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
Find your warmest path to The Townwide Fund of Huntington Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.