Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Todd and Betiana Simon Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Arts & Culture$119kCrime & Legal$20kRecreation & Sports$15kHousing & Shelter$14kEducation$13kPublic Benefit$12kEnvironment$11kHuman Services$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEAL FAMILY FOUNDATION$5,000
FLIGHT-PATH$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 12%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
NH
WA
IL
NY
SD
IA
IN
RI
CO
NE
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$95k · 21 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
43

Total granted

$95k
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+16%

Still filing today

76%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureCivil RightsPhilanthropyInternationalEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CASA FOR DOUGLAS COUNTY
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +10%
  • AC
    ARTIST COMMUNITIES ALLIANCE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $15k · revenue +96%
  • IS
    INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER
    2× · 2020–2021 · $5k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • FS
    FILM STREAMS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +6%
  • NC
    NEBRASKA CULTURAL ENDOWMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +9%
  • P
    PACE
    one grant, 2020 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
2
Plains Art Museum

The plains art museum brings people and art together. as a public institution we celebrate the finest of human achievement and inspire and engage diverse audiences in the creation, exhibition, collection, and preservation of art.

Arts & Culture
3
Nebraska Humanities Council

Humanities nebraska helps nebraskans explore what connects us and makes us human.

4
Nebraska Community Foundation

The nebraska community foundation unleashes abundant local assets, inspires charitable giving, and connects ambitious people to build stronger communities and a greater nebraska.

Philanthropy
5
Hastings Museum

The mission of the hastings museum is to bring to life the natural and cultural history of hastings, adams county and the great plains of nebraska through the use of educational programs, exhibits and films.

6
Omaha Children's Museum

Omaha children's museum is a not-for-profit organization that provides children and families with opportunities to discover how the world works, challenge themselves, and learn through play. the mission of the museum is to engage the…

Arts & Culture
7
Opera Omaha Inc

Enriching the quality of life in the community by creating professional opera and music theater, which uniquely combine the visual and performing arts to express humanity's deepest emotions and highest aspirations.

Arts & Culture
8
Aclu Nebraska

For over 50 years in nebraska, the aclu has worked in courts, legislatures, and communities to protect the constitutional and individual rights of all people. with a nationwide network of offices and millions of members and supporters,…

9
The Nebraska Land Trust Inc

To foster the protection of agricultural, historical and natural resources on land in nebraska through education, partnering and permanent conservation.

Environment
10
Lincoln Children's Museum

The lincoln children's museum invites children to create, discover and learn through the power of play.

Arts & Culture
11
Aia Nebraska a Chapter of the American Institute of Architects

Aia nebraska is the nebraska society of the american institute of architects. the american institute of architects is the voice of the architectural profession and the resource for its members in service to society.

12
Nebraska Academy of Sciences
Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Civic Nebraska and the most unlike its peers is Solomon R Guggenheim Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyWomen & Girls Leadership De…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community Arts CentersEnvironmental Conservation …Cancer Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsChristian Missionary Organi…Local History MuseumsIndependent K-12 SchoolsMilitary Veterans SupportAffordable Housing Construc…Immigrant Worker SupportCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 25. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number15%0%<5yr10%9%5–10yr19%27%10–20yr15%30%20–35yr17%18%35–55yr24%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value15%0%<5yr10%10%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr15%62%20–35yr17%10%35–55yr24%4%55yr+

The field is 15% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/46
the rest of the field
8%
1,067/14,066

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/42
Grantees still filing
32/42
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FILM STREAMS INC — $50,000 · OtherFILM STREAMS INCPACE — $10,000 · OtherPACEWESTSIDE FOUNDATION — $7,000 · OtherFONTENELLE NATURE ASSOCIATION — $5,250 · Other+49 more — $81,805 · Other+49 moreCASA FOR DOUGLAS COUNTY — $20,000 · Crime & LegalCASA FOR …CIVIC NEBRASKA — $10,000 · Civil RightsBlack Votes Matter Institute of Community Engagement — $7,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $700 · Civil Rights+1 more — $500 · Civil RightsNEBRASKA CULTURAL ENDOWMENT — $15,000 · Philanthropy+3 more — $1,500 · PhilanthropyARTIST COMMUNITIES ALLIANCE — $15,000 · Community ImprovementFRIENDS OF MONTESSORI CHILDREN'S ROOM — $12,000 · EducationBACKYARD SPORTS CARES INC — $2,000 · EducationMIDWEST HOUSING EQUITY GROUP INC — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OMAHA INC — $4,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$154,055Crime & Legal$20,000Civil Rights$18,200Philanthropy$16,500Community Improvement$15,000Education$14,000Housing & Shelter$14,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFILM STREAMS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCASA FOR DOUGLAS COUNTY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetARTIST COMMUNITIES ALLIANCE — $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNEBRASKA CULTURAL ENDOWMENT — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF MONTESSORI CHILDREN'S ROOM — $12,000 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetMIDWEST HOUSING EQUITY GROUP INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCIVIC NEBRASKA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBlack Votes Matter Institute of Community Engagement — $7,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetINTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER — $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGREAT PLAINS BLACK HISTORY MUSEUM — $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $4,256 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OMAHA INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTORYCORPS INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATE UGANDA — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBACKYARD SPORTS CARES INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFOREST CONSERVANCY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetOMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR INQUIRY INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PSI UPSILON FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEBRASKA COMMUNITIES PLAYHOUSE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAQUA-AFRICA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLIGHT-PATH — $1,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetMOUNTAINFILM — $825 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Alaska Community Foundation — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA COALITION FOR LIFE SAVING CURES — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOLLAND CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPLETELY KIDS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA BRASS BAND INC — $500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF NOTRE-DAME DE PARIS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN G NEIHARDT FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TRI-FAITH INITIATIVE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION — $280 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF NEBRASKA ART — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRAZY HORSE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $45 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sherwood FoundationNE35.3× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · The Holland Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · The Fred and Eve Simon Charitable Foundation · John K & Lynne D Boyer Foundation · Annette and Paul Smith Charitable Fund · Jewish Federation of Omaha Foundation · The Hawks Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Todd and Betiana Simon Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Todd and Betiana Simon Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Todd and Betiana Simon Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph