Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Thomas P Waters Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$280k
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$243kHuman Services$217kFood & Nutrition$202kEducation$187kReligion$135kAnimals$99kInternational$71kRecreation & Sports$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k38 grants · $190k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $90k
$5,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR CONSIOUS LIVING & DYING$20,000
RON AND VICKI SANTO DIABETIC ALERT$10,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEA$10,000
MANNA FOOD BANK INC$10,000
FOOTHILLS CARING CORPS INC$10,000
COMBAT HERO BIKE BUILD INC$10,000
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USA$10,000
SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR$10,000
PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK$8,000
ATLANTA CENTER FOR SELF SUFFICIENCY$8,000
STAR HOUSE FOUNDATION$8,000
THE CAMPUS KITCHENS PROJECT$8,000
MONASTARY OF THE HOLY SPIRITY$8,000
APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN PROJECT ACCESS$7,500
APPALACHIAN HIGHLANDS HUMANE SOCIET$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $123k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMONWEAL: $4k → 8%AMERICA'S MIGHTY WARRIORS: $4k → 11%LABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICK: $8k → 12%LABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $7k → 12%LABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $5k → 12%LABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $3k → 12%LABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $1k → 12%BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN YOUTH & FAMILIES: $8k → 12%BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN YOUTH & FAMILIES: $8k → 12%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $1k → 11%BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN YOUTH & FAMILIES: $8k → 12%BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN YOUTH & FAMILIES: $5k → 12%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $3k → 12%BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN YOUTH & FAMILIES: $5k → 12%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $3k → 12%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $3k → 12%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $3k → 12%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $2k → 12%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $1k → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $10k → 12%SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR: $10k → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIA: $6k → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $5k → 12%SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE INC: $5k → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $4k → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of The Thomas P Waters Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Thomas P Waters Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 62 repeat orgs$265k to everyone else

62 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

62
31

Total granted

$1.3M
$151k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+35%

Still filing today

71%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $114k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RA
    Ron and Vicki Santo Diabetic Alert Dogs Foundation
    5× · 2020–2024 · $46k · revenue +24%
  • SH
    STAR HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $45k · revenue +7%
  • PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $45k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JEAN BAPTISTE PAROCHIAL HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • RP
    REALNESS PROJECT
    one grant, 2024 · $11k · revenue 0%
  • GC
    GONZAGA COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
2
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
3
Domestic Violence Initiative for Women With Disabilities

Empowering victims and creating a bridge to close the gap for people with disabilities through discovery of self-resiliency by providing support and services.

—
4
Fort Collins Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put god's love into action; habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. fort collins habitat for humanity adheres…

Housing & Shelter
5
Combat Recovery Foundation

Through structured programs, we create opportunities for veterans to transform their experiences into strengths, reinforcing that they are not alone and that their skills remain valuable in civilian life. by partnering with private…

Human Services
6
Boulder Watershed Collective

The Boulder Watershed Collective is a 501c3 non-profit stakeholder-driven organization established to address forested watershed health,resiliency and stewardship. We have three program areas: ClimateAdaptation and Resilience Watershed…

Environment
7
Food Bank of the Rockies

Food bank of the rockies ignites the power of community to nourish people facing food insecurity.

Food & Nutrition
8
Project Angel Heart

Project angel heart improves health and well-being for people with life- threatening illnesses by preparing and delivering medically tailored meals and promoting the power of food as medicine.

Community Improvement
9
Humane Society of the Pikes Peak Region

To offer compassionate care to animals, support safe communities, and provide socially conscious sheltering. (continued on schedule o)

Animals
10
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
11
Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
12
America's Second Harvest of the Big Bend Inc

To advance change by feeding the hungry and educating and engaging the community in the fight to end hunger.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mediators Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Colten Cowell Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
69/71
Grantees still filing
45/71
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE WHISPERING HOPE RANCH FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherTHE WHISPERING HOPE RANCH FOUNDATIONSTAR HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · OtherTHE CAMPUS KITCHENS PROJECT: $45,000 · OtherFOOTHILLS CARING CORPS INC: $45,000 · OtherMONASTERY OF THE HOLY GHOST INC: $36,500 · OtherNORTH TEXAS PATRIOT ANGLERS INC: $45,000 · OtherATLANTA CENTER FOR SELF SUFFICIENCY INC: $44,500 · Other+65 more: $624,950 · Other+65 moreRon and Vicki Santo Diabetic Alert Dogs Foundation: $46,000 · HealthRon and Vicki S…PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $45,000 · HealthPANCREATIC CANC…COMBAT HERO BIKE BUILD INC: $25,000 · HealthCOMBAT HERO BIK…CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $25,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEAL…Be the Difference Foundation: $20,000 · HealthBe the Differen…MARY CROWLEY MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER: $15,000 · HealthMARY CROWLEY ME…REINTEGRA INC: $10,000 · HealthHOPEKIDS INC: $8,000 · HealthAPPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN PROJECT ACCESS INC: $7,500 · HealthJOHNSON CITY RECOVERY CENTER: $7,500 · Health+1 more: $4,000 · HealthBLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $33,500 · Human ServicesBLACK MOU…EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $28,000 · Human ServicesEMERGENCY…LABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $23,000 · Human ServicesLABORATOR…SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesSISTER CA…SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE INC: $14,500 · Human ServicesSAFEHOUSE…+4 more: $13,000 · Human Services+4 moreMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $40,000 · Food & NutritionTHE CONSCIOUS ALLIANCE: $37,500 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST TN: $10,000 · Food & NutritionOpen Doors of Asheville Inc: $26,500 · EducationTEACHING PEACE INC: $23,000 · EducationFRIENDS SCHOOL INC: $15,000 · EducationMASA Seed Foundation: $7,500 · EducationSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $4,000 · EducationFriends of Boulder Community School of Integrated: $3,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationAppalachian Sustainable Agriculture Project: $35,500 · EnvironmentTHE KIVA CENTER: $18,800 · EnvironmentTHORNE ECOLOGICAL INSTITUTE: $8,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $8,000 · EnvironmentHOMEWARD BOUND OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $42,000 · Housing & ShelterANGELICA VILLAGE: $8,000 · Housing & ShelterBELOVED ASHEVILLE: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$935,950Health$213,000Human Services$127,000Food & Nutrition$87,500Education$80,000Environment$70,300Housing & Shelter$55,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE WHISPERING HOPE RANCH FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetRon and Vicki Santo Diabetic Alert Dogs Foundation: $46,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetSTAR HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $45,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS PATRIOT ANGLERS INC: $45,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetATLANTA CENTER FOR SELF SUFFICIENCY INC: $44,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetHOMEWARD BOUND OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $42,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $40,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSCIOUS ALLIANCE: $37,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAppalachian Sustainable Agriculture Project: $35,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $33,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $28,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFOOTBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC: $28,000 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetOpen Doors of Asheville Inc: $26,500 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCOMBAT HERO BIKE BUILD INC: $25,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $23,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTEACHING PEACE INC: $23,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetBEYOND THE BRICKS INC: $21,500 over 6y, 7.7% of budgetBOULDER VALLEY WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER INC: $21,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBe the Difference Foundation: $20,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetAsheville GreenWorks: $20,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetDONT FORGET TO FEED ME PET FOOD BANK INC: $20,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetTHE KIVA CENTER: $18,800 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetWATER FOR PEOPLE: $16,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $16,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMARY CROWLEY MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $15,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS SCHOOL INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetIgnatian Lay Volunteer Corporation: $15,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE INC: $14,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF BOULDER COUNTY INC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHIRD LAW DANCETHEATER: $13,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetREALNESS PROJECT: $11,200 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetTOUGHEST KIDS INC: $10,500 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST TN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREINTEGRA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetTHE COMPASSIONATE LISTENING PROJECT: $10,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetCHAHTA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSPCA of Texas: $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHORNE ECOLOGICAL INSTITUTE: $8,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOPEKIDS INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANGELICA VILLAGE: $8,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetAPPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN PROJECT ACCESS INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJOHNSON CITY RECOVERY CENTER: $7,500 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetAPPALACHIAN HIGHLANDS HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE WHISPERING HOPE RANCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Ron and Vicki Santo Diabetic Alert Dogs Foundation ↗
  • Who funds STAR HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS PATRIOT ANGLERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA CENTER FOR SELF SUFFICIENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEWARD BOUND OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSCIOUS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Appalachian Sustainable Agriculture Project ↗
  • Who funds BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOTBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Open Doors of Asheville Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMBAT HERO BIKE BUILD INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds LABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING ↗
  • Who funds TEACHING PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND THE BRICKS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOULDER VALLEY WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Be the Difference Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Asheville GreenWorks ↗
  • Who funds DONT FORGET TO FEED ME PET FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KIVA CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WATER FOR PEOPLE ↗
  • Who funds ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MARY CROWLEY MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Ignatian Lay Volunteer Corporation ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO25× affinity14 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County · AEC Trust · The Denver Foundation · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Rose Community Foundation · The Frances & William H Beattie Fdn · Pajwell Foundation · The Longmont Community Foundation · The Women's Foundation of Colorado Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Impactassetsinc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Thomas P Waters Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Thomas P Waters Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Thomas P Waters Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Thomas P Waters Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 109 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Thomas P Waters’ filings →

More from the funding graph