Skip to content
The Theuerkorn Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Theuerkorn Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$33kHuman Services$13kFood & Nutrition$8kEducation$7kHousing & Shelter$6kHealth$6kCivil Rights$2kArts & Culture$600
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$127k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW ANTHEM CHURCH$5,000
TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 15% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FORGOTTEN HARVEST: $2k → 8%MONROE CITY CHURCH: $1k → 10%FRIENDS OF FOSTER KIDS: $2k → 10%MICHIGAN HEARTBEAT ASSOCIATION: $2k → 11%LIFEHOUSE: $1k → 13%MOTOR CITY CHURCH: $3k → 16%ST FRANCIS OF ASSISI CATHOLIC CHURCH: $1k → 16%DSO: $600 → 21%FORGOTTEN HARVEST: $2k → 8%FRIENDS OF FOSTER KIDS: $2k → 10%MICHIGAN HEARTBEAT ASSOCIATION: $500 → 11%MOTOR CITY CHURCH: $2k → 16%ST PAUL ON THE LAKE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $530 → 21%FOGOTTEN HARVEST: $2k → 8%FRIENDS OF FOSTER KIDS: $500 → 10%NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $2k → 8%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2k → 10%EPILEPSY FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%SALVATION ARMY: $2k → 10%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2k → 10%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2k → 10%NEW ANTHEM CHURCH: $3k → 10%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $825 → 10%TRINITY EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $5k → 10%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $5k → 10%NEW ANTHEM CHURCH: $5k → 10%TRINITY FOOD PANTRY: $3k → 10%NEW ANTHEM CHURCH: $3k → 10%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $3k → 10%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $2k → 10%TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $2k → 10%TRINITY FOR HARP: $2k → 10%TRINITY EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $1k → 10%COMPASSION PREGNANCY: $1k → 10%COMPASSION PREGNANCY: $1k → 10%TRINITY FOR HARP: $1k → 10%TRINITY EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $500 → 10%FRIENDS OF FOSTER KIDS: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$61k · 10 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
10

Total granted

$61k
$14k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    4× · 2019–2023 · $6k · revenue +127%
  • TP
    TURNING POINT INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $6k · revenue +19%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF FOSTER KIDS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $6k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • TF
    TRINITY FOOD PANTRY
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • EF
    EPILEPSY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $11,100 · OtherTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCHNEW ANTHEM CHURCH: $10,500 · OtherNEW ANTHEM CHURCHTRINITY EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $6,900 · OtherTRINITY EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTERMOTOR CITY CHURCH: $4,850 · OtherMOTOR CITY CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherTRINITY FOOD PANTRY: $2,500 · OtherEPILEPSY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $2,000 · OtherMICHIGAN HEARTBEAT ASSOCIATION: $2,000 · Other+6 more: $5,930 · Other+6 moreHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $6,425 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT F…TURNING POINT INC: $5,600 · Human ServicesFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $5,600 · Food & NutritionFRIENDS OF FOSTER KIDS: $5,600 · PhilanthropyCOMPASSION PREGNANCY CENTER: $2,210 · Health
Other$50,280Housing & Shelter$6,425Human Services$5,600Food & Nutrition$5,600Philanthropy$5,600Health$2,210

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $6,425 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTURNING POINT INC: $5,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $5,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF FOSTER KIDS: $5,600 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCOMPASSION PREGNANCY CENTER: $2,210 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT INC ↗
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FOSTER KIDS ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION PREGNANCY CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Theuerkorn Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Theuerkorn Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Theuerkorn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home