Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Theosophical Society in Cleveland

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$246kInternational$51kHuman Services$35kFood & Nutrition$27kAnimals$15kHealth$11kCommunity Improvement$9kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY IN AMERICA$15,000
PROVIDENCE HOUSE$1,500
HUNGER NETWORK$1,500
CLEVELAND FOOD BANK$1,500
JOURNEY CENTER FOR SAFETY HEALING$1,000
CLEVELAND RAPE CRISIS CENTER$1,000
THE CITY MISSION$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
PARMA ANIMAL SHELTER$1,000
IDEASTREAM PUBLIC MEDIA-PBS$1,000
THEOSOPHICAL ORDER OF SERVICE$1,000
VALLEY SAVE A PET$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 27% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%IDEASTREAM PUBLIC MEDIA-PBS: $1k → 17%THEOSOPHICAL ORDER OF SERVICE: $1k → 7%WVIZ PBS: $1k → 17%THEOSOPHICAL ORDER OF SERVICE: $1k → 7%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $1k → 17%WVIZ PBS: $1k → 17%THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY IN AMERICA: $50k → 7%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $1k → 17%THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY IN AMERICA: $50k → 7%WVIZ PBS: $1k → 17%THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY IN AMERICA: $25k → 7%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $1k → 17%THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY IN AMERICA: $25k → 7%IDEASTREAM PUBLIC MEDIA-PBS: $1k → 17%THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY IN AMERICA: $25k → 7%TS-AMERICA FOR ADYAR: $25k → 7%THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY IN AMERICA: $25k → 7%TS-AMERICA FOR ADYAR: $25k → 7%THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY IN AMERICA: $20k → 7%THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY IN AMERICA: $15k → 7%PROVIDENCE HOUSE: $2k → 17%PROVIDENCE HOUSE: $2k → 17%HUNGER NETWORK OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $2k → 17%HUNGER NETWORK OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $2k → 17%PROVIDENCE HOUSE: $2k → 17%HUNGER NETWORK OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $2k → 17%HUNGER NETWORK OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $2k → 17%PROVIDENCE HOUSE: $2k → 17%HUNGER NETWORK OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $2k → 17%HUNGER NETWORK OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $2k → 17%PROVIDENCE HOUSE: $2k → 17%PROVIDENCE HOUSE: $2k → 17%PROVIDENCE HOUSE: $2k → 17%PROVIDENCE HOUSE: $2k → 17%PROVIDENCE HOUSE: $2k → 17%HUNGER NETWORK OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $2k → 17%CLEVELAND FOOD BANK: $2k → 17%CLEVELAND FOOD BANK: $2k → 17%CLEVELAND FOOD BANK: $2k → 17%CLEVELAND FOOD BANK: $2k → 17%CLEVELAND FOOD BANK: $2k → 17%CLEVELAND FOOD BANK: $2k → 17%CLEVELAND FOOD BANK: $2k → 17%CLEVELAND FOOD BANK: $2k → 17%CLEVELAND FOOD BANK: $2k → 17%HUNGER NETWORK: $2k → 17%HUNGER NETWORK: $2k → 17%SALVATION ARMY: $6k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$402k · 20 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
6

Total granted

$402k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+3%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHealthAnimalsInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY IN AMERICA
    8× · 2017–2025 · $236k · revenue +1%
  • PH
    PROVIDENCE HOUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +201%
  • GC
    GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • TC
    THE CLEVELAND ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue -25%
  • CM
    CLEVELAND MAIDAN ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $520 · revenue +3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ohio Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The ohio society for the prevention of cruelty to animals works to prevent and stop cruelty to animals throughout ohio. our mission falls into three main areas: 1) intervention in cases of animal cruelty, 2) animal rehabilitation, and 3)…

2
Columbus Humane

To fight animal cruelty, help animals in need and advocate for their well-being.

Animals
3
Paws and Prayers Inc

None

Animals
4
Greater Cleveland Volunteers

Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…

Philanthropy
5
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
6
Animal Charity of Ohio Inc

The society is dedicated to promoting care for all animals. we strive to never turn away sick or injured. our goal is to bring about a world where humane societies are no longer necessary.

Animals
7
Northeast Ohio Spca Inc

Animal shelter that focuses on adoption, spay and neuter, and other humane education with the goal of making euthanasia of healthy animals unnecessary.

Human Services
8
Ohio Tri County Food Alliance Dba Second Harvest Food Bank

The mission of ohio tri county food alliance/second harvest food bank is to alleviate hunger in clark, champaign, and logan counties by sourcing and distributing nutritious food to people in need, building community partnerships, and…

Food & Nutrition
9
Philanthropy Ohio

To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.

Philanthropy
10
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
11
Lake Humane Society

Mission: to protect animals and build connections between pets and people through advocacy and education. vision: leading and guiding a humane lake county core values: compassion for pets and people. engagement through innovative programs,…

Animals
12
Citizens for Humane Action Inc

Our mission is to serve the people and animals of Central Ohio by providing safe, temporary shelter and care for abandoned or otherwise homeless cats and dogs, and to reduce pet overpopulation by means of spay and neuter, education, and…

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cleveland Rape Crisis Center and the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY IN AMERICA — $236,000 · OtherTHEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY IN AMERICATS-AMERICA FOR ADYAR — $50,000 · OtherTS-AMERICA FOR ADYARSALVATION ARMY — $14,000 · OtherPROVIDENCE HOUSE INC — $13,500 · Other+12 more — $48,580 · Other+12 moreGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC — $13,500 · Food & NutritionHUNGER NETWORK OF GREATER CLEVELAND — $10,500 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $30 · Food & NutritionRAPE CRISIS CENTER — $7,000 · HealthCLEVELAND RAPE CRISIS CENTER — $2,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $1,500 · HealthVALLEY SAVE A PET INC — $4,500 · AnimalsPARMA ANIMAL SHELTER INC — $2,000 · AnimalsTHE CLEVELAND ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE — $1,000 · AnimalsCLEVELAND MAIDAN ASSOCIATION — $520 · International
Other$362,080Food & Nutrition$24,030Health$10,500Animals$7,500International$520

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY IN AMERICA — $236,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetPROVIDENCE HOUSE INC — $13,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC — $13,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHUNGER NETWORK OF GREATER CLEVELAND — $10,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRAPE CRISIS CENTER — $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEY SAVE A PET INC — $4,500 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetCLEVELAND RAPE CRISIS CENTER — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARMA ANIMAL SHELTER INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE THEOSOPHICAL ORDER OF SERVICE USA INC — $2,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND MAIDAN ASSOCIATION — $520 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANN GEORGE FOOD PANTRY — $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY IN AMERICA
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE HOUSE INC
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds HUNGER NETWORK OF GREATER CLEVELAND
  • Who funds RAPE CRISIS CENTER
  • Who funds VALLEY SAVE A PET INC
  • Who funds CLEVELAND RAPE CRISIS CENTER
  • Who funds PARMA ANIMAL SHELTER INC
  • Who funds THE THEOSOPHICAL ORDER OF SERVICE USA INC
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE
  • Who funds CLEVELAND MAIDAN ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds THE ANN GEORGE FOOD PANTRY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Theosophical Society in Cleveland funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Theosophical Society in Cleveland?

    Find your warmest path to The Theosophical Society in Cleveland through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph