Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Talk to Tucker Foundation Inc

The f.c.

$75k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182023.

Health$225kHousing & Shelter$60kYouth Development$25kArts & Culture$24kEducation$15kAnimals$10kHuman Services$10k
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$75,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$108k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RILEY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$75,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%DAMAR SERVICES INC: $1k → 16%PAWS & THINK INC: $10k → 16%EXODUS REFUGEE IMMIGRATION INC: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

24%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$90k · 5 repeat orgs$279k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +104% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
13

Total granted

$90k
$204k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+104%
+33%

Still filing today

80%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    Dayspring Center Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $30k · revenue +24%
  • FP
    Family Promise of Greater Indianapolis Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $20k · revenue +104%
  • BL
    BRIGHTLANE LEARNING CORP
    2× · 2018–2019 · $15k · revenue +350%

Funded once

  • SV
    ST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +14%
  • HEAR INDIANA INC
    one grant, 2019 · $14k · revenue -25%
  • FF
    FIGHT FOR LIFE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +63%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hoosier Families Inc

Hoosier Families is a non-profit organization that provides Community Based programs for Indiana children and families. Hoosier Families is committed to utilizing evidence-based practices to strengthen, rebuild and reunite the individuals…

Human Services
2
Indiana Guardianship Services

At indiana guardianship services, inc., we are dedicated to providing our clients with the same compassion, attention, and patience as our own family. through competence, service, and dignity, we uphold the values of the national…

Human Services
3
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
4
United Methodist Youth Home Inc

Operates Group Homes and Day Treatment Program for teens placed through the courts and licensed by the Indiana Department of Child Services.

Human Services
5
Enroll Indy Inc

Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…

Education
6
Kipp Indianapolis Inc

KIPP Indy is a network of tuition-free, open-enrollment, college preparatory, public charter schools. KIPP Indy's mission is to create a network of schools that provides educationally underserved children with a rigorous education that…

Education
7
Indiana Statewide Independent Living Council Inc

To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.

Human Services
8
Catholic Charities Indianapolis Inc

The staff and volunteers of Catholic Charities Indianapolis are called by the Gospel to uphold the dignity of all people. Guided by Catholic social teaching, we consider it a privilege to deliver compassionate and caring service to help…

9
Feeding Indiana's Hungry Inc

By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.

Human Services
10
Healthlinc Incorporated

Coordinate health care information by providing a community-wide clinical data and information exchange to the health care community.

11
Faith in Indiana

Faith in Indiana (formerly IndyCAN) is a catalyst for faith communities and marginalized peoples to act collectively for racial and economic justice in Indiana. FaithIN develops civic leaders directly impacted by inequality, awakens the…

Human Services
12
Indiana Co Child Day Care Program

Teaming with families to provide high quality child care and education services for all children.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Morning Light Inc and the most unlike its peers is Paws & Think Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · HealthST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INCGENNESARET FREE CLINIC INC — $10,000 · HealthGENNESARET FREE CLINIC INCBrooke's Place for Grieving Young People — $10,000 · HealthBrooke's Place for Grieving Young Peop…MORNING LIGHT INC — $5,000 · HealthJames Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association — $75,000 · PhilanthropyJames Whitcomb Riley Me…Dayspring Center Inc — $30,000 · Housing & ShelterDayspring Cente…Family Promise of Greater Indianapolis Inc — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterFamily Promise …OXFORD HOUSE INC — $15,000 · OtherOXFORD HOUSE IN…HEAR INDIANA INC — $14,000 · OtherHEAR INDIANA IN…Youth For Christ Inc — $10,000 · OtherYouth For Chris…SUSAN G KOMEN CENTRAL INDIANA AFFILIATE — $10,000 · OtherSUSAN G KOMEN C…THE O'CONNOR HOUSE — $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE O'CON…PAWS & THINK INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesPAWS & TH…Exodus Refugee Immigration Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesExodus Re…+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesBRIGHTLANE LEARNING CORP — $15,000 · EducationFIGHT FOR LIFE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentIndianapolis Children's Choir — $8,500 · Arts & Culture
Health$125,000Philanthropy$75,000Housing & Shelter$50,000Other$49,000Human Services$31,000Education$15,000Youth Development$15,000Arts & Culture$8,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJames Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association — $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDayspring Center Inc — $30,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetFamily Promise of Greater Indianapolis Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetBRIGHTLANE LEARNING CORP — $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHEAR INDIANA INC — $14,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFIGHT FOR LIFE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetTHE O'CONNOR HOUSE — $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetGENNESARET FREE CLINIC INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBrooke's Place for Grieving Young People — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPAWS & THINK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetExodus Refugee Immigration Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMORNING LIGHT INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDamar Services Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Indiana Community Foundation IncIN35.5× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc · Hoover Family Foundation · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Thurston Foundation · Eugene & Marilyn Glick Foundation · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Talk to Tucker Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph