· Private foundation
The Sutowski Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $105k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JOHN CARROLL UNIVERSITY FOR JEAN SUTOWSKI ENDOWED SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $30,000 |
| WALSH JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| AKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| ST BASIL THE GREAT | $10,000 |
| THE HIGHLAND FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| VICTORY GALLOP | $5,000 |
| JESUIT RETREAT CENTER | $5,000 |
| OHIO VALLEY VOICES | $5,000 |
| SMILES WITH STYLE | $4,000 |
| ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 44% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WSWILSON SCHOLARSHIP FUND6× · 2020–2025 · $215k · revenue +97% · 74% of their budget
- ACAKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +24%
- VGVICTORY GALLOP INC6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- SHST HILARY PARISH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve the health of children, teenagers and young adults through excellence in patient care, education, research, advocacy and community partnerships.
Accelerating the most effective gene therapy treatments for children with ultra-rare diseases.
To advance cures and treatment of childhood cancer and other rare diseases.
Our Mission is to inspire our communities to invest in health and scientific advances to improve the health of children and their families in Canada and around the world.
Philanthropically supporting a family of organizations caring for over 2,900 children with some of the most challenging medical conditions on earth at elizabeth seton children's center, elizabeth seton children's school and elizabeth seton…
Jackson health foundation operates exclusively to support jackson health system a code sec 170(b)(1)(a)(iii) organization and the onlypublic hospital in miamidade county, florida. its mission is to raise funds to support jackson health…
St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…
Grant special wishes to children with a life-threatening medical problem
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wilson Scholarship Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WILSON SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
- Who funds AKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WALSH JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VICTORY GALLOP INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SOCIETY OF GREATER AKRON ↗
- Who funds OHIO VALLEY VOICES ↗
- Who funds ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds SMILES WITH STYLE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Sutowski Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.