Skip to content
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g.

$19M
Granted FY2025still arriving
61
Grants FY2025still arriving
24
States reached
$946k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$107MScience & Tech$55MEducation$37MRecreation & Sports$1.4MHuman Services$670kInternational$661kHousing & Shelter$279kCivil Rights$35k
02FY2025 · 61 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 61 grants below total $16,090,919, the rows itemized in this filing. The $18,581,010 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,490,091 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $92k
  • $50k–250k34 grants · $3.8M
  • $250k+23 grants · $12M
$158,660
Median grant
24
States reached
$179M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Univ of North Carolina at Chapel Hill$945,992
Johns Hopkins University$937,500
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute$870,000
Indiana University (Indianapolis)$834,515
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc$729,735
Vanderbilt University Medical Center$721,137
Univ of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center$600,000
Duke University Medical Center$589,097
UT Southwestern Medical Center'$560,410
The Ohio State University College$530,919
Weill Medical College of Cornell Univ$520,000
University of Pennsylvania$473,675
Indiana U (Indianapolis)$458,619
Stanford University'$448,168
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr$375,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Patient Advocate Foundation: $475k → 14%Patient Advocate Foundation: $25k → 14%African Women's Cancer Awareness Assoc: $89k → 11%WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $30k → 11%Boat People SOS: $94k → 6%Ethiopian Community Development Council: $50k → 7%African Women's Cancer Awareness Assoc: $59k → 11%Wesley Community Center: $22k → 11%Quantum Leap HealthCare Collaborative: $10k → 10%Boat People SOS: $65k → 6%Ethiopian Community Development Council: $30k → 7%African Women's Cancer Awareness Assoc: $57k → 11%Wesley Community Center: $8k → 11%Quantum Leap HealthCare Collaborative: $8k → 10%Boat People SOS: $14k → 6%AFRICAN WOMENS CANCER AWARENESS ASSOC: $10k → 11%Ethiopian Community Development Council: $20k → 7%Federacio De Clubes Michoacanos: $29k → 14%African Women's Cancer Awareness Assoc: $28k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$178M · 148 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

148 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2025, 105 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

148
48

Total granted

$178M
$2.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+36%

Still filing today

64%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $327k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesScience & TechInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $15M · revenue +162%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $12M · revenue +64%
  • CC
    Cancer Care Inc
    5× · 2017–2022 · $8.2M · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY
    one grant, 2018 · $243k
  • Trustees of Tufts Collegegraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $243k · revenue +36%
  • TH
    THE HOMESTEAD INC OF NANTUCKET
    one grant, 2019 · $150k · revenue -43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
5
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
6
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
7
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
8
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
9
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
10
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
11
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
12
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University; the most unlike its peers is Caring Foundation of Wyoming. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

134 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 134 of the 209 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
132/134
Grantees still filing
113/134
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $11,149,112 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILLIndiana University School of Medicine: $10,042,950 · OtherIndiana University School of MedicineUTMD ANDERSON: $6,777,464 · OtherUTMD ANDERSONOregon Health & Science University: $5,467,797 · OtherOregon Health & Science UniversityUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $3,045,463 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $2,956,169 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $2,824,458 · Other+85 more: $41,276,163 · Other+85 moreJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $11,797,003 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYBaylor College of Medicine: $6,848,917 · EducationBaylor College of MedicineVanderbilt University: $6,639,782 · EducationVanderbilt UniversityTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $5,949,763 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVAN…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $4,972,909 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STAN…WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $4,224,301 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYDUKE UNIVERSITY: $3,875,260 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $3,379,205 · EducationUniversity of Chicago: $2,780,949 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $2,544,983 · Education+32 more: $18,906,924 · Education+32 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $15,011,535 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Ins…Cancer Care Inc: $8,193,416 · HealthCancer Care IncMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $2,720,062 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERI…UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $2,135,271 · Health+46 more: $12,281,123 · Health+46 moreThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $528,070 · Science & TechUniversity of Kansas Center for Research Inc: $449,518 · Science & TechCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $396,000 · Science & TechHUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY: $310,706 · Science & TechNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $128,500 · Science & Tech+1 more: $33,919 · Science & TechNorthwestern University: $1,837,141 · Recreation & SportsROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $1,240,015 · PhilanthropyCARING FOUNDATION OF WYOMING: $500,000 · Human ServicesAFRICAN WOMEN'S CANCER AWARENESS ASSOCIATION INC: $243,382 · Human ServicesBOAT PEOPLE S O S INC: $194,729 · Human ServicesETHIOPIAN COMMUNITY DEV COUNCIL INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesWESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $59,495 · Human Services+3 more: $59,775 · Human Services
Other$83,539,576Education$71,919,996Health$40,341,407Science & Tech$1,846,713Recreation & Sports$1,837,141Philanthropy$1,240,015Human Services$1,157,381

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $15,011,535 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $11,797,003 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCancer Care Inc: $8,193,416 over 5y, 17% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $6,848,917 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetVanderbilt University: $6,639,782 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $5,949,763 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $4,972,909 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $4,224,301 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $3,875,260 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $3,379,205 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $2,780,949 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $2,720,062 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $2,544,983 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $2,135,271 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetNorthwestern University: $1,837,141 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $1,788,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,609,274 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $1,572,211 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,555,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $1,519,529 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $1,329,444 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $1,240,015 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetEmory University: $1,146,131 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $1,011,987 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE WISSAHICKON INC: $1,003,000 over 4y, 31% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $994,403 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WISTAR INSTITUTE OF ANATOMY AND BIOLOGY: $900,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $891,954 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLUMINIS HEALTH DOCTORS COMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTER INC: $790,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $720,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $711,346 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $664,680 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $649,990 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $550,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $539,924 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $539,239 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $528,070 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $520,165 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation: $508,133 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEqual Hope: $500,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY INC: $500,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPRIMARY CARE COALITION OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND INC: $500,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCARING FOUNDATION OF WYOMING: $500,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetThe Broad Institute Inc: $494,996 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE: $472,702 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $460,960 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPARKLAND FOUNDATION: $450,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $449,962 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Cancer Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Cancer Socie…American Heart Associ…Vanderbilt University…Direct ReliefMayo ClinicAlzheimer's Disease &…University of Pittsbu…Johns Hopkins Univers…Washington UniversityYale UniversityThe Trustees of Colum…Muscular Dystrophy As…
American Cancer Society IncGA47.3× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Cancer Society Inc · American Heart Association Inc · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Direct Relief · Mayo Clinic · Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc · University of Pittsburgh · Johns Hopkins University · Washington University · Yale University · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Coriell Institute for Medical Research Inc: 44% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
  • The Broad Institute Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Mobile Medical Care Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Force-Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology: 12% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Casa Inc: 8% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • The University of Vermont Medical Center: 1% of income from government
  • Holy Cross Hospital Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Luminis Health Doctors Community Medical Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 209 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Susan G Komen Breast Cancer’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home