Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Susan and Richard Hare Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$122k
Granted FY2018
12
Grants FY2018
7
States reached
$47k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Education$92kPublic Safety & Disaster$60kHealth$50kArts & Culture$20kFood & Nutrition$10kReligion$9kEnvironment$5kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2018 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k9 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $80k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAINT MARK'S SCHOOL$47,300
AMERICAN RED CROSS$19,800
MICHAEL J FOX PARKINSONS RESEARCH$12,500
UCSF BENIOFF CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$7,300
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY$7,300
Individual grant recipient$5,000
SUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ALZHHE IMER'S ASSOCIATION$5,000
AMERICARES$3,000
STLUKES WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION$2,335
PROJECT HOMELESS CONNECT$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $64k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $40k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 14%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $4k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
ID
MT
IL
NY
MA
CT
CA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$162k · 5 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
18

Total granted

$162k
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+112%

Still filing today

60%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    2× · 2017–2018 · $60k · revenue +46%
  • SV
    SUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +7%
  • SL
    ST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k · revenue +144%

Funded once

  • PF
    PEACE FUND - STPAUL'S SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • BC
    BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +172%
  • SV
    SUN VALLEY CENTER FOR THE ARTS - GA
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Valley Vision

Valley vision is a civic leadership organization dedicated to improving the livability of the sacramento region. through research and action, we collaborate on bold, long-term solutions that improve people's lives.

Community Improvement
4
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
5
Project Big Wood a Nonprofit Corporation

Project big wood is organized to improve the environmental health and ecology of the big wood river basin in central idaho by protecting, enhancing, sustaining and reconnecting the big wood river, its tributaries and its watershed.

Environment
6
Council for Watershed Health

Council for watershed health advances the health and sustainability of the region's watersheds, rivers, streams, and habitats - in both natural areas and urban neighborhoods - through science-based research, education, and inclusive…

Environment
7
Reunity Resources

To provide education and promote the use of recycling, sustainable practices alternative energy and community resources for the betterment of the environment and public at large.

Environment
8
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
9
Second Harvest Heartland

Second harvest heartland's mission is to end hunger together. in partnership with more than 1,000 food shelves and hunger-relief programs in minnesota and western wisconsin, we provided 145 million meals to neighbors last year.

Food & Nutrition
10
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
11
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
12
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Monument Crisis Center; the most unlike its peers is Contra Costa Youth Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAINT MARKS SCHOOL ALTADENA INC: $67,300 · OtherSAINT MARKS SCHOOL ALTADENA INCMICHAEL J FOX PARKINSONS RESEARCH: $20,000 · OtherMICHAEL J FOX PARKINSONS RESEARCHPEACE FUND - STPAUL'S SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherPEACE FUND - STPAUL'S SCHOOLSUN VALLEY CENTER FOR THE ARTS - GA: $10,000 · OtherSUN VALLEY CENTER FOR THE ARTS - GAALAMEDA COHEALTH CARE SERVICES: $10,000 · OtherALAMEDA COHEALTH CARE SERVICESMONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $7,300 · OtherUCSF BENIOFF CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $7,300 · Other+15 more: $49,500 · Other+15 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $59,800 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cro…MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $4,000 · Human ServicesMONUMENT CRISIS CENTERBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionSUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureWOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO: $5,000 · EnvironmentTHE BEECH HILL SCHOOL: $2,500 · EducationLafayette Partners in Education: $2,500 · EducationST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC: $4,835 · Health
Other$181,400Human Services$63,800Food & Nutrition$10,000Arts & Culture$10,000Environment$5,000Education$5,000Health$4,835

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $59,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC: $4,835 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BEECH HILL SCHOOL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLafayette Partners in Education: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetContra Costa Youth Council: $2,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds SUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC ↗
  • Who funds WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO ↗
  • Who funds ST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SUPER STARS LITERACY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BEECH HILL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Lafayette Partners in Education ↗
  • Who funds Contra Costa Youth Council ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATES FOR SURVIVORS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & SEXUAL ASSAULT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Susan and Richard Hare Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Susan and Richard Hare Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Susan and Richard Hare Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Susan and Richard Hare Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Susan and Richard Hare Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph