Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

The Susan & David Horowitz Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$183
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
4
Grants FY2025
1
Organizations funded FY2024
100%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$50
Largest grant, FY2025
$50
Organizations funded a year
1 to 7
FY2017 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 100% of the organizations The Susan & David Horowitz Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’22’23’24
InternationalReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving3$15067%
FY20241$500100%
FY20231$2k100%
FY20225$2k80%
FY20206$2k83%
FY20193$1k0%
FY20187$5k43%
FY20176$4kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$12kPhilanthropy$1kHuman Services$1kHealth$1kInternational$450Public Benefit$200Education$50Membership Benefit$50Other$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 12 grantees

Plus 10 recipients with no EIN on record ($4k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Susan & David Horowitz Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYeshiva of Central Queens: $1,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOhr Somayach International Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Ateret Cohanim Inc: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Afikim Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Committee for Shaare Zedek Hospital in Jerusalem Inc: $900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommittee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America Inc: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Institute for National Security of America: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJgive-Friends of Asor Fund USA Inc: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY12.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Susan & David Horowitz Foundation with peer funders

About The Susan & David Horowitz Foundation

How much does The Susan & David Horowitz Foundation give?
The Susan & David Horowitz Foundation reported 4 grants totaling $183 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 7 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2024.
What does The Susan & David Horowitz Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Religion (72%), Philanthropy (9%), Human Services (7%).
Who are The Susan & David Horowitz Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Darchei Hora Ah Lrabbanim ($3k), Ezrat Israel Inc ($2k), Yeshiva of Central Queens ($2k).
Does The Susan & David Horowitz Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Susan & David Horowitz Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Susan & David Horowitz Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Communal Fund, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is The Susan & David Horowitz Foundation based?
The Susan & David Horowitz Foundation is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Susan & David Horowitz’s filings →

More from the funding graph