Loading…
· Private foundation
THE SUJATA AND SANJIV NARAYAN FOUNDATION
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$227k
Granted FY2024
6
Grants
2
Communities
$56k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 71% of THE SUJATA AND SANJIV NARAYAN FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02FY2024 · 6 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $1k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $216k
$53,503
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
- AMERICAN SCHOOL IN LONDON FOUNDATION$56,002
- SERRA HIGH SCHOOL$55,003
- SILICON VALLEY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL$53,503
- NOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL$51,002
- PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK$10,001
- EN POINTE AGAINST BRAIN CANCER$1,001
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 10%. 24% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 6 repeat orgs$169k to everyone else
6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
6
6
Total granted
$1.4M
$168k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+29%
+117%
Still filing today
67%
67%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
InternationalFood & NutritionAnimalsHealthScience & TechOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SVSILICON VALLEY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL8× · 2017–2024 · $589k · revenue +97%
- BSBRITISH SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC4× · 2017–2022 · $212k · revenue +29%
- ASAMERICAN SCHOOL IN LONDON FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $99k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- FAFEEDING AMERICAgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +52%
- HTHINDU TEMPLE SOUTH BAYone grant, 2018 · $30k
- CACHARITIES AID FOUNDATION OF AMERICAone grant, 2020 · $27k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
The International School of
Provides co-educational, bilingual educational programs for 1,081 students in grades pk-12.
Education
2
French American School of Silicon Valley
To provide students with an academically excellent bilingual and bicultural education which empowers them to succeed in both the french and american education systems and to fully realize their potential as global citizens.
Education
3
Pacific East Quality Education
YCIS Silicon Valley is a welcoming school community where all children from preschool through grade 8 are encouraged to find and follow their gifts as they learn in both Chinese and English. Our goal:to help our students become…
Education
4
International School of Los Angeles
See mission statement from part iii line 1 on schedule o.
Education
5
Feeding San Diego
On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals... feeding san diego is on a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community…
Food & Nutrition
6
Silicon Schools Fund Inc
Support the launch of excellent new schools and innovative practices that improve education.
Education
7
Austin International School Association
Our School offers a high quality French-American curriculum in a multicultural environment.
Education
8
Extrafood
To help end hunger and food waste in californias bay area.
Food & Nutrition
9
California Institute of Advanced
Non-profit, private, post-secondary graduate university offering a Master of Business Administration in Executive Management, Project Management and Business Analytics.
Education
10
German International School of Silicon
The german international school of silicon valley (the "school") provides german government-accredited elementary and secondary education.
Education
11
The Berkeley School
A preschool-8th grade independent school whose mission is to ignite curious minds, awaken generous hearts, and engage a changing world.
—
12
Marin Academy
Independent, co-educational, college preparatory high school located in san rafael, california.
Education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American School in London Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Playing At Learning. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$1,101,057International$311,108Food & Nutrition$105,002Health$35,003Science & Tech$4,501Animals$1,001
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SILICON VALLEY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BRITISH SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING AMERICA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SCHOOL IN LONDON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds PLAYING AT LEARNING ↗
- Who funds PETS IN NEED ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy FundNY15.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · Bright Funds Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation THE SUJATA AND SANJIV NARAYAN FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BRITISH SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 136161189 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on BRITISH SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to The Sujata and Sanjiv Narayan Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Sujata and Sanjiv Narayan Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines