Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Stribling Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$119k
Granted FY2026still arriving
13
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$111kHuman Services$105kPublic Safety & Disaster$96kArts & Culture$88kPhilanthropy$52kYouth Development$47kFood & Nutrition$22kHousing & Shelter$21kOther$0
02FY2026 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k7 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $85k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSOURI MILITARY ACADEMY$25,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$20,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$10,000
UNITED WAY OF AUDRAIN COUNTY$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$10,000
THE FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL AND NW$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
PRESSER HALL PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$5,000
MEXICO PARKS FOUNDATION$5,000
HANDI-SHOP INC$5,000
MEXICO AREA FAMILY YMCA$5,000
MISSOURI MILITARY ACADEMY$4,480
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $86k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 18%AUDRAIN COUNTY CRISIS INTERVENTION: $10k → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 18%MEXICO AREA FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 18%MEXICO AREA FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 18%MEXICO AREA FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 18%MEXICO AREA FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 18%MEXICO AREA FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 18%MEXICO AREA FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$538k · 14 repeat orgs$181k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2026, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
20

Total granted

$538k
$176k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+3%

Still filing today

50%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    5× · 2022–2026 · $50k · revenue +7%
  • PA
    PRESSER ARTS CENTER
    3× · 2018–2020 · $48k · revenue +22%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    6× · 2017–2026 · $46k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • AC
    AUDRAIN CO CRISIS INTERVENTION SVC
    one grant, 2017 · $60k
  • A
    ACCIS
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • TH
    THE HELP CENTER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
A T Still University of Health Sciences

A.T. Still University of Health Sciences serves as a learning-centered university dedicated to preparing highly competent professionals through innovative academic programs. The University is committed to continuing its osteopathic…

Education
2
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
3
Memorial Health System Group

To improve the health of the people and the communities we serve.

—
4
Missouri State Medical Association

Msma's mission is to serve its members through promotion of the science & art of medicine, protection of the health of the public & betterment of the medical profession in missouri.

—
5
Mexico Recreation Corporation

To support recreational facilities for audrain county, mo.

Recreation & Sports
6
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
7
Ozark Center

To improve the health of the communities we serve through contemporary, innovative, evidence-based, trauma-informed, quality behavioral healthcare solutions.

Health
8
Washington Regional Medical Center

Washington regional is committed to improving the health of people in communities we serve through compassionate, high-quality care, prevention, and wellness education.

Health
9
Missouri Centers for Independent Living
—
10
Meadville Medical Center

Your independent community health system is dedicated to providing high quality, innovative and affordable healthcare for the well-being of our community.

Health
11
Freeman Neosho Hospital Inc

To improve the health of the communities we serve through contemporary, innovative, quality healthcare solutions.

Health
12
Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc

The tragedy assistance program for survivors (taps) is america's national nonprofit organization that has cared for the loved ones of our nation's fallen heroes since 1994. taps ensures these living legacies of service and sacrifice do not…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Missouri Military Academy; the most unlike its peers is The Help Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AUDRAIN CO CRISIS INTERVENTION SVC: $60,000 · OtherAUDRAIN CO CRISIS INTERVENTION SVCBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $56,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAUNITED WAY OF AUDRAIN COUNTY: $53,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF AUDRAIN COUNTYPRESSER HALL PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $40,000 · OtherPRESSER HALL PERFORMING ARTS CENTERACCIS: $30,000 · OtherACCISHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $25,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYTHE FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL AND NW: $25,000 · OtherTHE FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL AND NWTHE HELP CENTER INC: $20,000 · OtherTHE HELP CENTER INC+19 more: $64,811 · Other+19 moreMISSOURI MILITARY ACADEMY: $100,725 · EducationMISSOURI MILITARY ACAD…WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $45,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJE…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $45,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red…Mexico Area Family YMCA INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesMexico Area Family YM…AUDRAIN COUNTY CRISIS INTERVENTION: $10,000 · Human ServicesAUDRAIN COUNTY CRISIS…PRESSER ARTS CENTER: $48,428 · Arts & CultureMEXICO PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$374,311Education$145,725Human Services$135,500Arts & Culture$48,428Recreation & Sports$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISSOURI MILITARY ACADEMY: $100,725 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPRESSER ARTS CENTER: $48,428 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $45,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMexico Area Family YMCA INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HELP CENTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetMEXICO PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetAUDRAIN COUNTY CRISIS INTERVENTION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetAudrain County Historical Society: $5,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetMcDermott Center: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISS MISSOURI SCHOLARSHIP ORGANIZATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISSOURI MILITARY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESSER ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Mexico Area Family YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HELP CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MEXICO PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AUDRAIN COUNTY CRISIS INTERVENTION ↗
  • Who funds Handi-Shop Inc ↗
  • Who funds Audrain County Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds McDermott Center ↗
  • Who funds MISS MISSOURI SCHOLARSHIP ORGANIZATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Miriam a Edmonston Charitable FoundationMO20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Miriam a Edmonston Charitable Foundation · Griffin Family Foundation Inc · Allen P and Josephine B Green · W Basil & Nina Leach Charitable Trust · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stribling Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stribling Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Stribling Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Stribling Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stribling’s filings →

More from the funding graph