Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Stewart Title Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$861k
Granted FY2024still arriving
158
Grants FY2024still arriving
33
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Community Improvement$671kEducation$472kHousing & Shelter$279kFood & Nutrition$213kHuman Services$167kCrime & Legal$98kInternational$92kHealth$48kOther$0
02FY2024 · 158 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 158 grants below total $559,995, the rows itemized in this filing. The $860,620 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $300,625 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k149 grants · $294k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $166k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$2,000
Median grant
33
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Rebuilding Together$100,000
Houston Food Bank$25,000
Feeding America$25,000
Child Advocates Inc$25,000
ALTA Good Deeds Foundation$25,000
MBA Opens Doors Foundation$25,000
Kids Meals Inc$15,620
Magic Bus USA$15,000
Exceptional Women Alliance$10,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
Our Destiny Our Future Foundation$5,500
Homes for Hope$5,000
Way To Go Foundation$5,000
Jordan Craig Parks Memorial Scholarship Foundation$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Rebuilding Together Valley of the Sun: $3k → 11%LovePacs: $1k → 5%Matthew's Light: $1k → 9%Meals On Wheels: $1k → 10%Riversport Foundation: $5k → 16%The Joshua Chamberlain Society: $1k → 11%Fidelco Guide Dog Foundation: $1k → 11%Always Endure: $1k → 14%Calvary Children's Home: $1k → 8%Family Mentor Foundation: $1k → 15%360 Youth Services: $1k → 7%Call To Freedom: $1k → 9%Project 150: $1k → 13%Special Touch Bakery: $1k → 14%Riversport Foundation: $5k → 16%Riversport Foundation: $3k → 16%World Food Program USA: $1k → 14%World Food Program USA: $1k → 14%Kids Meals Inc: $16k → 16%Dress For Success Houston: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
AR
TN
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$999k · 60 repeat orgs$428k to everyone else

60 repeat relationships: 58 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 100 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

60
118

Total granted

$999k
$233k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+10%

Still filing today

27%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $196k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The Houston Food Bank
    3× · 2022–2024 · $79k · revenue +16%
  • AG
    ALTA GOOD DEEDS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $75k · revenue +24%
  • Feeding America
    2× · 2023–2024 · $75k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • GG
    Global Giving Ukrainian Relief Fund
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • WT
    Way To Go Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • UW
    United Way of Worcester
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society of Harris County

Humane Society of Harris County's mission remains steadfast: to provide high-quality adoption, transport, foster, Trap, neuter, release, and pet food pantry services to our community. Yet, with a fresh perspective and a renewed passion,…

—
2
Take Paws Rescue

The mission of take paws rescue is to meet the moral obligation to protect and save the lives of pets in need of rescue in louisiana. take paws rescue enacts this mission by pulling pets from rural and high kill shelters and preparing them…

Animals
3
Pippys Pals Rescue

Pippys Pals Rescue is dedicated to saving the lives of dogs facing euthanasia in Houston. Our mission is to provide a second chance to these beloved companions by rescuing them from shelters, providing them with necessary medical care, and…

Animals
4
The Humane Society of Austin & Travis County Inc

The austin humane society (ahs) offers comprehensive, humane, life-saving animal services, transforming the lives of animals and those who love them. because we believe homeless animals deserve a chance to thrive in a loving environment,…

Animals
5
Second Chance Pet Adoptions Inc

To champion homeless cats and dogs who are healthy or treatable in the quest to find their forever homes and engage with our community to provide responsible pet ownership reducing future generations of homeless animals.

Animals
6
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
7
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
8
Operation Kindness

Our mission is to create a kinder world for pets and the people who love them by providing lifesaving care, innovative programs, and community resources.

Animals
9
Citizens for Animal Protection Inc

Citizens for Animal Protection, Inc. (CAP) cares for pets in need through sheltering, adoption, humane education, spay/neuter services, low-cost wellness, and community outreach. CAP fulfills its mission by focusing on enhancing the lives…

Animals
10
Noah's Animal House Foundation

To remove the "no pets allowed" sign on the doors of domestic violence shelters. women should not have to choose between leaving their abuser and leaving their pets behind to be abused.

Animals
11
A Life to Live Animal Shelter and Adoption Center

We have a no-kill mission to save the lives of homeless cats and dogs abandoned and/or placed in kill shelters, while also providing life-saving programs and services to keep pets and their people together. through outreach, education and…

—
12
Pet Orphans of Southern California

In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Promise House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jordan Craig Parks Memorial Sch Fnd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

80 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 80 of the 278 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
78/80
Grantees still filing
44/80
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Houston Food Bank: $78,500 · OtherThe Houston Food BankGlobal Giving Ukrainian Relief Fund: $25,000 · Other+188 more: $571,145 · Other+188 moreREBUILDING TOGETHER INC: $260,000 · Housing & ShelterREBUILDING TOGETHER IN…+1 more: $8,000 · Housing & ShelterMBA OPENS DOORS FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropyMBA OPENS …HOMES FOR HOPE: $15,000 · PhilanthropyHOMES FOR …GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCHILD ADVOCATES INC: $96,000 · Crime & LegalALTA GOOD DEEDS FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Community ImprovementFeeding America: $75,000 · Food & NutritionMAGIC BUS USA: $30,000 · InternationalBE LIKE BRIT FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · International
Other$674,645Housing & Shelter$268,000Philanthropy$120,000Crime & Legal$96,000Community Improvement$75,000Food & Nutrition$75,000International$40,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER INC: $260,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMBA OPENS DOORS FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES INC: $96,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $78,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALTA GOOD DEEDS FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 3y, 9.4% of budgetFeeding America: $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAGIC BUS USA: $30,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetKIPP Texas Inc: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS' MEALS INC: $15,620 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOMES FOR HOPE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRIVERSPORT FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBE LIKE BRIT FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTIC GENERAL HOSPITAL: $5,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBeauregard Health System Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BALTIMORE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $2,875 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS CITY PET PROJECT: $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIM SCOTS YOUTH FOOTBALL AND CHEER: $1,300 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER INC ↗
  • Who funds MBA OPENS DOORS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds ALTA GOOD DEEDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds MAGIC BUS USA ↗
  • Who funds KIPP Texas Inc ↗
  • Who funds KIDS' MEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR HOPE ↗
  • Who funds RIVERSPORT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BE LIKE BRIT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTIC GENERAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Jordan Craig Parks Memorial Sch Fnd ↗
  • Who funds Beauregard Health System Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX18.3× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Greater Good Charities · McKesson Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · Petsmart Charities Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Baker Hughes Foundation · Best Friends Animal Society · American Express Foundation · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · S&P Global Foundation Fka the McGraw-Hill Research Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stewart Title Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stewart Title Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • The Baltimore Children's Museum Inc: 33% of income from government
  • The Family Tree Inc: 9% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Stewart Title Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Stewart Title Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 278 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stewart Title’s filings →

More from the funding graph