Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Stewart B Eckers Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$124k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Philanthropy$719kEducation$134kEnvironment$17kRecreation & Sports$12kHealth$6kHousing & Shelter$5kArts & Culture$5kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUND$110,000
NORTH BEND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTA$7,500
WILEY H BATES MIDDLE SCHOOL$3,000
POLY PARENT FACULTY ASSOCIATION$2,500
THE GREAT CHESAPEAKE BAY SWIM$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LAUNDRYCARES FOUNDATION: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$863k · 13 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +287% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
21

Total granted

$863k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+287%
+12%

Still filing today

23%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUND
    7× · 2019–2025 · $719k
  • NB
    NORTH BEND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTA
    6× · 2019–2025 · $41k
  • WH
    WILEY H BATES MIDDLE SCHOOL
    7× · 2019–2025 · $29k

Funded once

  • BS
    BALTIMORE SCHOOL OF MODEL ENGINEERS
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • PS
    POT SPRING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • LR
    LAKE ROLAND NATURE CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Blue Water Baltimore

To restore the quality of baltimore's rivers, streams and harbor to foster a healthy environment, a strong economy, and thriving communities.

Environment
2
University of Baltimore Foundation Inc

To raise and manage funds and to provide financial support to the university of baltimore. the foundation provides leadership, guidance, and support to the university's administration in advancing the mission and vision of the university.

Education
3
Baltimore County Sailing Center Incorporated

The organization is a community sailing center dedicated to the mission of bringing people of all ages to the water and inspiring a life-long passion for boating. The Sailing Center requires its instructors to be certified to insure the…

Recreation & Sports
4
Pride of Baltimore Inc

To promote historical maritime education, foster economic development and tourism, and represent the people of maryland in every port she visits. pride of baltimore ii set sail as the goodwill ambassador for the state of maryland in 1988.…

—
5
Brain Injury Association of Maryland

Provide leadership and support to persons with brain injuries via a wide variety of projects and programs in resource coordination, prevention, advocacy and self-determination.

Health
6
Autism Society of Maryland Inc

The autism society of marylands mission is to create connections, empowering everyone in the autism community with the resources needed to live fully.

Health
7
Baltimore Community Lending Inc

The mission of baltimore community lending is supporting the revitalization and strengthening of underserved communities in the greater baltimore region through innovative financial solutions and collaborative resources designed to promote…

Community Improvement
8
Baltimore Tree Trust Inc

To restore baltimore's urban forest through increased tree planting, community engagement, and advocacy.

Environment
9
Baltimore Curriculum Project Inc

To develop, implement, and advocate for an innovative, sustainable, and replicable education model that improves students outcomes. in so doing, the baltimore curriculum project will help to raise educational standards and opportunities…

Education
10
Baltimore Community Toolbank Inc

To steward an inventory of tools for lending to charitable organization to increase the impact of their mission-related efforts in the community.

—
11
Baltimore Lab School Inc

Baltimore Lab School is an innovative learning community fostering scholarship and creativity in students with different learning styles. In an environment of inquiry and hands-on exploration, Baltimore Lab School students learn to…

Education
12
Baltimore Area Health Education Center

To eliminate health disparities by educating and strengthening the health care workforce. bahec provides interdisciplinary education programs that bridge academic, healthcare, and community settings to transform the health of underserved…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Laundrycares Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Towson Elks #469 Charity Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUND: $719,000 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUNDNORTH BEND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTA: $41,000 · Other+22 more: $121,000 · Other+22 moreTHE BALTIMORE POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 · EducationCARVER CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · EducationRAGE AGAINST ADDICTION INC: $1,000 · EducationCENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC: $5,500 · EnvironmentTHE GREAT CHESAPEAKE BAY SWIM INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING: $500 · PhilanthropyAT JACOBS WELL INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MARYLAND INC: $2,500 · HealthADDICTION CONNECTIONS RESOURCE INC: $1,000 · HealthTOWSON ELKS #469 CHARITY FUND INC: $3,000 · Community Improvement
Other$881,000Education$19,000Environment$5,500Philanthropy$5,500Housing & Shelter$5,000Health$3,500Community Improvement$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BALTIMORE POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GREAT CHESAPEAKE BAY SWIM INC: $5,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetAT JACOBS WELL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTOWSON ELKS #469 CHARITY FUND INC: $3,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCARVER CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MARYLAND INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADDICTION CONNECTIONS RESOURCE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAGE AGAINST ADDICTION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLAUNDRYCARES FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBALTIMORE AREA SPECIAL HOCKEY: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BALTIMORE POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GREAT CHESAPEAKE BAY SWIM INC ↗
  • Who funds AT JACOBS WELL INC ↗
  • Who funds TOWSON ELKS #469 CHARITY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CARVER CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds ADDICTION CONNECTIONS RESOURCE INC ↗
  • Who funds RAGE AGAINST ADDICTION INC ↗
  • Who funds LAUNDRYCARES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BALTIMORE AREA SPECIAL HOCKEY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stewart B Eckers Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stewart B Eckers Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 26%
  • Center for Coastal Studies Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Maryland Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Stewart B Eckers Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Stewart B Eckers Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stewart B Eckers’ filings →

More from the funding graph