Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Stewart B Eckers Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$124k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Philanthropy$719kEducation$134kEnvironment$17kRecreation & Sports$12kHealth$6kHousing & Shelter$5kArts & Culture$5kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUND$110,000
NORTH BEND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTA$7,500
WILEY H BATES MIDDLE SCHOOL$3,000
POLY PARENT FACULTY ASSOCIATION$2,500
THE GREAT CHESAPEAKE BAY SWIM$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LAUNDRYCARES FOUNDATION: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$863k · 13 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +287% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
21

Total granted

$863k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+287%
+12%

Still filing today

23%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHealthEnvironmentRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUND
    7× · 2019–2025 · $719k
  • NB
    NORTH BEND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTA
    6× · 2019–2025 · $41k
  • WH
    WILEY H BATES MIDDLE SCHOOL
    7× · 2019–2025 · $29k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • PS
    POT SPRING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF LOWER FAIRFEILD COUNTY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Blue Water Baltimore

To restore the quality of baltimore's rivers, streams and harbor to foster a healthy environment, a strong economy, and thriving communities.

Environment
2
University of Baltimore Foundation Inc

To raise and manage funds and to provide financial support to the university of baltimore. the foundation provides leadership, guidance, and support to the university's administration in advancing the mission and vision of the university.

Education
3
Baltimore County Sailing Center Incorporated

The organization is a community sailing center dedicated to the mission of bringing people of all ages to the water and inspiring a life-long passion for boating. The Sailing Center requires its instructors to be certified to insure the…

Recreation & Sports
4
Pride of Baltimore Inc

To promote historical maritime education, foster economic development and tourism, and represent the people of maryland in every port she visits. pride of baltimore ii set sail as the goodwill ambassador for the state of maryland in 1988.…

5
Brain Injury Association of Maryland

Provide leadership and support to persons with brain injuries via a wide variety of projects and programs in resource coordination, prevention, advocacy and self-determination.

Health
6
Autism Society of Maryland Inc

The autism society of marylands mission is to create connections, empowering everyone in the autism community with the resources needed to live fully.

Health
7
Baltimore Community Lending Inc

The mission of baltimore community lending is supporting the revitalization and strengthening of underserved communities in the greater baltimore region through innovative financial solutions and collaborative resources designed to promote…

Community Improvement
8
Baltimore Tree Trust Inc

To restore baltimore's urban forest through increased tree planting, community engagement, and advocacy.

Environment
9
Baltimore Curriculum Project Inc

To develop, implement, and advocate for an innovative, sustainable, and replicable education model that improves students outcomes. in so doing, the baltimore curriculum project will help to raise educational standards and opportunities…

Education
10
Baltimore Community Toolbank Inc

To steward an inventory of tools for lending to charitable organization to increase the impact of their mission-related efforts in the community.

11
Baltimore Lab School Inc

Baltimore Lab School is an innovative learning community fostering scholarship and creativity in students with different learning styles. In an environment of inquiry and hands-on exploration, Baltimore Lab School students learn to…

Education
12
Baltimore Area Health Education Center

To eliminate health disparities by educating and strengthening the health care workforce. bahec provides interdisciplinary education programs that bridge academic, healthcare, and community settings to transform the health of underserved…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Laundrycares Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Towson Elks #469 Charity Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUND — $719,000 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUNDNORTH BEND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTA — $41,000 · Other+22 more — $121,000 · Other+22 moreTHE BALTIMORE POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC — $15,000 · EducationCARVER CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 · EducationRAGE AGAINST ADDICTION INC — $1,000 · EducationCENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC — $5,500 · EnvironmentTHE GREAT CHESAPEAKE BAY SWIM INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING — $500 · PhilanthropyAT JACOBS WELL INC — $5,000 · Housing & ShelterPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MARYLAND INC — $2,500 · HealthADDICTION CONNECTIONS RESOURCE INC — $1,000 · HealthTOWSON ELKS #469 CHARITY FUND INC — $3,000 · Community Improvement
Other$881,000Education$19,000Environment$5,500Philanthropy$5,500Housing & Shelter$5,000Health$3,500Community Improvement$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE BALTIMORE POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC — $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAT JACOBS WELL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE GREAT CHESAPEAKE BAY SWIM INC — $5,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTOWSON ELKS #469 CHARITY FUND INC — $3,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCARVER CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MARYLAND INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE AREA SPECIAL HOCKEY — $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetRAGE AGAINST ADDICTION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLAUNDRYCARES FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetADDICTION CONNECTIONS RESOURCE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BALTIMORE POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds CENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC
  • Who funds AT JACOBS WELL INC
  • Who funds THE GREAT CHESAPEAKE BAY SWIM INC
  • Who funds TOWSON ELKS #469 CHARITY FUND INC
  • Who funds CARVER CENTER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MARYLAND INC
  • Who funds BALTIMORE AREA SPECIAL HOCKEY
  • Who funds RAGE AGAINST ADDICTION INC
  • Who funds LAUNDRYCARES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ADDICTION CONNECTIONS RESOURCE INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Stewart B Eckers Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 26%
  • Center for Coastal Studies Inc26% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Maryland Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Stewart B Eckers Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Stewart B Eckers Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph