Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Stephen H Goldman Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$367k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$385kArts & Culture$223kEnvironment$63kHealth$10kPublic Benefit$10kHuman Services$1kInternational$1kSocial Science$250Other$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $39k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $300k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCF FOUNDATION INC$200,000
WHY U$100,000
NATIONAL YOUNG COMPOSERS CHALLENGE$25,000
WINTER PARK VOICE$13,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CATALYSTS INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL CONTR$5,000
IDEAS FOR US INC$5,000
FIRST AMENDMENT FOUNDATION$5,000
TIMUCUA ARTS FOUNDATION$1,500
WINTER PARK HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION$1,000
PERFORMING ARTS MATTER INC$500
CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL OF BLACK HIL$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%IDEAS FOR US INC: $11k → 13%IDEAS FOR US INC: $5k → 13%IDEAS FOR US INC: $5k → 13%IDEAS FOR US INC: $5k → 13%IDEAS FOR US INC: $5k → 13%IDEAS FOR US INC: $4k → 13%IDEAS FOR US INC: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 19 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
11

Total granted

$1.3M
$130k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
0%

Still filing today

68%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $279k · revenue +16%
  • NY
    NATIONAL YOUNG COMPOSERS CHALLENGE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $125k · revenue +4% · 100% of their budget
  • IF
    IDEAS FOR US INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +289%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUND
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • OL
    Orlando Land Trust Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -99%
  • WP
    WISDOMVR PROJECT
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -98% · 47% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Orlando Philharmonic
—
2
Florida Education and Arts Trust
Philanthropy
3
United Artist Collaborative
Arts & Culture
4
Foundation for Modern Opera
—
5
United Federation of Artistic Minds
Arts & Culture
6
Buskerfest Miami Inc

improving civic life through public perf

Arts & Culture
7
Musiva Concert Series Inc

Arts & Culture (Music Performance & Education)

Arts & Culture
8
Think Global Arts Foundation
International
9
Orlando Urban Film Festival Foundation Inc

OUFF an Urban Community Movie, Music Showcase Celebrate and expose the media arts. The purpose is to provide public exposure for independent creators and entrepreneurs in film and music including producers, actors, and screenwriters ie.…

Arts & Culture
10
Me Dance Inc

The Mission of ME Dance is to introduce innovative ideas through dance to create growth in the arts community. Our goal is to enrich the arts community by providing an outlet to feature talent in art through entertainment.

Arts & Culture
11
Orlando Flamenco Inc

Orlando Flamencos mission is to make the UNESCO World Heritage art of Flamenco more accessible to the Orlando community by delivering top artists from Spain for performance / master classes /choreography

Arts & Culture
12
Encanto Arts
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Orlando Museum of Art Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wisdomvr Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WHY U INC: $755,000 · EducationWHY U INCUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $278,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INCNATIONAL YOUNG COMPOSERS CHALLENGE INC: $124,500 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL YOUNG …WINTER PARK VOICE INC: $25,500 · Arts & CultureWINTER PARK VOI…Orlando Shakespeare Theater Inc: $20,000 · Arts & CultureOrlando Shakesp…BLUE BAMBOO CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureBLUE BAMBOO CEN…UNITED ARTS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $12,000 · Arts & CultureUNITED ARTS OF …+4 more: $11,500 · Arts & Culture+4 moreUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUND: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY O…Individual grant recipient: $16,750 · OtherIndividual g…Individual grant recipient: $14,500 · OtherIndividual g…WISDOMVR PROJECT: $10,000 · OtherWISDOMVR PRO…Winter Park Historical Association Inc: $6,000 · Other+8 more: $15,650 · Other+8 moreIDEAS FOR US INC: $39,500 · Human ServicesWINTER PARK LAND TRUST INC: $13,500 · EnvironmentOrlando Land Trust Inc: $10,000 · Environment+1 more: $100 · EnvironmentFIRST AMENDMENT FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Civil RightsFRIENDS OF DAGO INC: $1,000 · InternationalPOPULATION CONNECTION: $250 · Social Science
Education$1,033,500Arts & Culture$208,500Other$162,900Human Services$39,500Environment$23,600Civil Rights$10,000International$1,000Social Science$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWHY U INC: $755,000 over 8y, 100% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $278,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL YOUNG COMPOSERS CHALLENGE INC: $124,500 over 8y, 100% of budgetIDEAS FOR US INC: $39,500 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetWINTER PARK VOICE INC: $25,500 over 2y, 20% of budgetOrlando Shakespeare Theater Inc: $20,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBLUE BAMBOO CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetWINTER PARK LAND TRUST INC: $13,500 over 4y, 21% of budgetUNITED ARTS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOrlando Land Trust Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetFIRST AMENDMENT FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetWISDOMVR PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 47% of budgetTIMUCUA ARTS FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetWinter Park Historical Association Inc: $6,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetORLANDO MUSEUM OF ART INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBACH FESTIVAL SOCIETY OF WINTER PARK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WHY U INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL YOUNG COMPOSERS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds IDEAS FOR US INC ↗
  • Who funds WINTER PARK VOICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Orlando Shakespeare Theater Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLUE BAMBOO CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds WINTER PARK LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED ARTS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds Orlando Land Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds FIRST AMENDMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WISDOMVR PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds TIMUCUA ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Winter Park Historical Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds ORLANDO MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF DAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds BACH FESTIVAL SOCIETY OF WINTER PARK ↗
  • Who funds POPULATION CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Florida FoundationFL15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Florida Foundation · James T and Diana P Barnes Foundation Inc · The David and Lyn Berelsman Family Charitable Foundation Trust · United Arts of Central Florida Inc · The Dr P Phillips Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stephen H Goldman Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stephen H Goldman Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Ideas for Us Inc: 35% of income from government
  • United Arts of Central Florida Inc: 1% of income from government
  • First Amendment Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Orlando Museum of Art Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Stephen H Goldman Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Stephen H Goldman Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stephen H Goldman’s filings →

More from the funding graph