Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Stephen and Joanne Kirk Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$109k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$406kEmployment$227kAnimals$118kYouth Development$47kHuman Services$40kRecreation & Sports$36kArts & Culture$26kEnvironment$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $86k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY$31,000
VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES$25,000
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY$20,000
CLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$10,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BLUECOATS INC$5,000
FRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH$5,000
STULBERG INTERNATIONAL STRING COMP$2,000
WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GREATER WESTERN RESERVE BOY SCOUTS: $5k → 16%POODLE CLUB OF AMERICA FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%POODLE CLUB OF AMERICA FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%POODLE CLUB OF AMERICA FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $55k → 17%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $45k → 17%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $40k → 17%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $31k → 17%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $26k → 17%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 17%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 17%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 17%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 17%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 17%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 17%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 17%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 17%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 17%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 17%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 17%CLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $45k → 17%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $8k → 17%CLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $11k → 17%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $8k → 17%CLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $10k → 17%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $7k → 17%CLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $10k → 17%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5k → 17%CLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $10k → 17%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5k → 17%CLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $8k → 17%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5k → 17%CLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $5k → 17%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5k → 17%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 17%VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES: $40k → 17%VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES: $25k → 17%VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES: $25k → 17%VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES: $25k → 17%VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES: $25k → 17%VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES: $17k → 17%VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES: $15k → 17%VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES: $15k → 17%VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES: $15k → 17%VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES: $15k → 17%VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES: $10k → 17%BLUECOATS INC: $5k → 17%BLUECOATS INC: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$939k · 12 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$939k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+47%

Still filing today

67%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEmploymentEducationCrime & LegalEnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CZ
    CLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $101k · revenue +72%
  • BI
    BLUECOATS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +18%
  • TP
    THE POODLE CLUB OF AMERICA
    4× · 2017–2020 · $16k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • GW
    GREATER WESTERN RESERVE BOY SCOUTS
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • LE
    LIBERIA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE CORPORATION
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Ohio Environmental Council

To protect the environment and health of all ohio communities through legal and policy advocacy, decision-maker accountability, and civic engagement.

Environment
2
West Creek Conservancy

Our mission is to enrich the lives of all people in northeast ohio by conserving natural habitats, restoring the ecological value of our region's lands and waters, and expanding opportunities to connect people from all cultures to…

Environment
3
Ohio Bankers League

Provide comprehensive services that benefit the financial institution industry in ohio.

Community Improvement
4
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
5
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
6
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
7
Ohio Life Sciences Foundation

The mission of ohio life sciences foundation is to accelerate bioscience discovery, innovation and commercialization of global value, driving economic growth, company attraction, improving workforce training and improved quality of life in…

Health
8
Ohio Business Roundtable

To harness the collective expertise of ohio's ceos to advocate for policies that improve ohio's economic competitiveness.

—
9
Committee for Our Cleveland Metroparks

Local ballot issue political action committee located in the state of Ohio

—
10
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
11
The Urban Land Institute

Shape the future of the built environment for transformative impact in communities worldwide. we are a global network of professionals in every sector of real estate development and land use, from private enterprise to public service.

Environment
12
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cleveland Zoological Society; the most unlike its peers is Liberia Economic Development Initiative Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $402,000 · OtherCLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherSTULBERG INTERNATIONAL STRING COMP: $16,000 · Other+6 more: $15,000 · OtherVOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES: $227,000 · EmploymentVOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICE…CLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $101,000 · AnimalsCLEVELAND ZOO…THE POODLE CLUB OF AMERICA: $16,000 · AnimalsTHE POODLE CL…LAKE ERIE COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $41,500 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS: $40,000 · EducationBLUECOATS INC: $40,000 · Crime & LegalUNIVERSITY CIRCLE INCORPORATED: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$473,000Employment$227,000Animals$117,000Youth Development$41,500Education$40,000Crime & Legal$40,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES: $227,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetCLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $101,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetLAKE ERIE COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $41,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS: $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBLUECOATS INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetTHE POODLE CLUB OF AMERICA: $16,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetUNIVERSITY CIRCLE INCORPORATED: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LAKE ERIE COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds BLUECOATS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE POODLE CLUB OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY CIRCLE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds LIBERIA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stephen and Joanne Kirk Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stephen and Joanne Kirk Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Stephen and Joanne Kirk Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Stephen and Joanne Kirk Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stephen and Joanne Kirk’s filings →

    More from the funding graph