Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Steinman Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$9.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
96
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$7.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Benefit$12MEducation$6.3MPhilanthropy$5.6MHousing & Shelter$4.1MEnvironment$2.8MCommunity Improvement$1.9MYouth Development$1.9MArts & Culture$1.7MOther$0
02FY2024 · 96 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k44 grants · $220k
  • $10k–50k32 grants · $612k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+2 grants · $7.4M
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$111M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STEINMAN INSTITUTE FOR CIVIC ENGAGEMENT$7,000,000
LANCASTERHISTORYORG$400,000
TOUCHSTONE FOUNDATION$229,419
ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE$156,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LANCASTER$120,000
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP$118,675
LANCASTER GENERAL HEALTH FOUNDATION$100,000
PENN STATE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$100,000
LANCASTER CITY ALLIANCE$100,000
UNITED WAY OF LANCASTER COUNTY$75,750
COCALICO SCHOOL DISTRICT$75,000
THE FILM COLLABORATIVE$75,000
HORIZONS AT LANCASTER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$74,000
LANCASTER SCIENCE FACTORY$70,000
LANCASTER CLEAN WATER PARTNERS$65,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $517k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BRIDGE OF HOPE: $10k → 6%COBY'S FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 9%UNITED CHURCHES ELIZABETHTOWN AREA: $10k → 9%LUTHERCARE: $30k → 9%LITITZ REC CENTER: $7k → 9%GOOD SAMARITAN SERVICES: $30k → 9%GOOD SAMARITAN SERVICES: $20k → 9%GOOD SAMARITAN SERVICES: $10k → 9%AARON'S ACRES: $27k → 9%AARON'S ACRES: $20k → 9%AARON'S ACRES: $5k → 9%LANCASTER EARLY EDUCATION CENTER: $100k → 9%LANCASTER EARLY EDUCATION CENTER: $100k → 9%LANCASTER EARLY EDUCATION CENTER: $100k → 9%VISION CORPS: $15k → 9%MILAGRO HOUSE: $15k → 9%YMCA OF THE ROSES: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
SD
OH
PA
CT
CA
VA
MD
DE
KS
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$34M · 141 repeat orgs$4.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

141 repeat relationships: 60 still active in FY2024, 81 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

141
125

Total granted

$34M
$3.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+33%

Still filing today

38%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $595k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LANCASTER FARMLAND TRUST
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +95%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LANCASTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +37%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF LANCASTER COUNTY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $885k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • HD
    HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION MIDATLANTIC
    one grant, 2023 · $750k · revenue -2%
  • LC
    LANCASTER COUNTY LOCAL JOURNALISM FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $500k
  • ED
    ECONOMIC DEVCO OF LANCASTER COUNTY
    one grant, 2018 · $250k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lancaster Chamber of Commerce & Industry

The lancaster chamber of commerce & industry's mission is to create the environment, facilitate partnerships, and lead on issues that elevate business success. the chamber has 5 strategic priorities: public policy, workforce, business…

—
2
Lancaster Community Safety Coalition

Enhance public safety and the quality of life in lancaster by engaging the community and advancing current crime prevention strategies.

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Lancaster General Health

Provides managerial and financial support to its controlled organizations and is also responsible for undertaking activities designed to advance the general health of the community.

Health
4
The Arc of Lancaster County

Empowering people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (i/dd) and their families to lead full, satisfying, independent lives of their choice.

Health
5
Lancaster County Academy

Lancaster county academy's mission is to empower non-traditional learners to achieve academic success, career readiness and personal growth through flexible, student-centered programs that values independence, resilience, and real-world…

Education
6
Lancaster County Council of the Arts

To enrich the quality of life in Lancaster County by building vibrant and inclusive communities connecting arts, culture, education, and economic vitality.

Arts & Culture
7
Lawrence County Economic Development Corp

To transform lives by serving as a creative force that promotes excellence in leadership, coordination, and orderly business development

—
8
Pennsylvania College of Art & Design

Pennsylvania college of art & design is a professional art college offering a bfa degree, certificates, credentials, and curricula that enable students of all ages to pursue art as their life's work.

Education
9
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
10
Assets Lancaster

Assets lancaster is a non-profit that works with start-up and existing businesses to form a more equitable and ethical economy. assets lancaster offers in-depth training and financing for entrepreneurs, and works with established…

Community Improvement
11
Central Penn Business Group On Health

Central business group on health advocates for the appropriate balance between cost and quality of employee healthcare in lancaster county by providing education on healthcare issues, promoting cooperation among payers, providers and…

—
12
Lycoming College

The mission of lycoming college is to provide a distinguished baccalaureate education in the liberal arts and sciences within a coeducational, supportive, and residential setting.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lancaster County Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Little Conestoga Creek Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

113 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 113 of the 303 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
32
Early backer (in before they grew)
107/113
Grantees still filing
81/113
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STEINMAN INSTITUTE FOR CIVIC ENGAGEMENT: $12,000,000 · OtherSTEINMAN INSTITUTE FOR CIVIC ENGAGEMENTCONESTOGA HOUSE FOUNDATION: $2,523,470 · OtherCONESTOGA HOUSE FOUNDATIONBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LANCASTER INC: $1,479,386 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LANCASTER INCLITTLE CONESTOGA CREEK FOUNDATION: $1,040,000 · Other+155 more: $10,329,227 · Other+155 moreDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $2,250,000 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVIS…LANCASTER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,400,000 · PhilanthropyLANCASTER C…TOUCHSTONE FOUNDATION: $437,198 · PhilanthropyTOUCHSTONE …+1 more: $100,000 · PhilanthropyFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE: $855,833 · EducationELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $768,000 · EducationLA ACADEMIATHE PARTNERSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL: $381,650 · EducationLANCASTER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $369,080 · EducationNEW TECH NETWORK INC: $207,265 · EducationTHADDEUS STEVENS FOUNDATION: $160,000 · Education+10 more: $334,489 · EducationLANCASTER FARMLAND TRUST: $1,779,456 · EnvironmentWATER SCIENCE INSTITUTE: $470,000 · EnvironmentLANCASTER COUNTY CONSERVANCY: $250,000 · EnvironmentTHE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $160,000 · Environment+1 more: $18,000 · EnvironmentUNITED WAY OF LANCASTER COUNTY: $884,946 · Arts & CultureLANCASTERHISTORYORG: $505,000 · Arts & CultureLANCASTER SCIENCE CENTER: $403,025 · Arts & CultureMusic for Everyone: $200,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC: $75,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $30,000 · Arts & CultureHOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION MIDATLANTIC: $750,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY FIRST FUND: $300,000 · Housing & ShelterTENFOLD COMMUNITY LENDING: $250,000 · Housing & ShelterLANCASTER CITY ALLIANCE: $780,000 · Community ImprovementLANCASTER REDEVELOPMENT FUND: $125,000 · Community Improvement+3 more: $46,250 · Community Improvement
Other$27,372,083Philanthropy$4,187,198Education$3,076,317Environment$2,677,456Arts & Culture$2,097,971Housing & Shelter$1,300,000Community Improvement$951,250

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $2,250,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLANCASTER FARMLAND TRUST: $1,779,456 over 7y, 15% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LANCASTER INC: $1,479,386 over 8y, 12% of budgetLANCASTER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,400,000 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetLITTLE CONESTOGA CREEK FOUNDATION: $1,040,000 over 2y, 53% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LANCASTER COUNTY: $884,946 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE: $855,833 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLANCASTER CITY ALLIANCE: $780,000 over 8y, 13% of budgetELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $768,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION MIDATLANTIC: $750,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetLANCASTERHISTORYORG: $505,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetWATER SCIENCE INSTITUTE: $470,000 over 6y, 86% of budgetTOUCHSTONE FOUNDATION: $437,198 over 3y, 26% of budgetLANCASTER SCIENCE CENTER: $403,025 over 8y, 8.4% of budgetLA ACADEMIATHE PARTNERSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL: $381,650 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetLANCASTER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $369,080 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCENTRAL MARKET TRUST: $310,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetLANCASTER DAY CARE CENTER: $300,000 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY FIRST FUND: $300,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTENFOLD COMMUNITY LENDING: $250,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetLANCASTER COUNTY CONSERVANCY: $250,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetNEW TECH NETWORK INC: $207,265 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetLANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL: $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMusic for Everyone: $200,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetBRIGHT SIDE OPPORTUNITIES CORPORATI: $183,215 over 6y, 15% of budgetSUSAN P BYRNES HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC: $175,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetTENFOLD: $170,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $160,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTHADDEUS STEVENS FOUNDATION: $160,000 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetLANCASTER REDEVELOPMENT FUND: $125,000 over 5y, 95% of budgetCHI ST JOSEPH CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $113,250 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF LANCASTER COUNTY: $110,400 over 4y, 10% of budgetTHE LANCASTER LGBTQ CENTER: $107,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetTHE BELL FOUNDATION INC: $105,090 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLANCASTER AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $100,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetLANCASTER GENERAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetAMERICAN SECONDARY SCHOOLS FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS AND TEACHERS INC: $92,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN OF LANCASTER: $90,000 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetLANCASTER CLEFT PALATE CLINIC: $78,750 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAll Star Code Inc: $75,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetLANCASTER HEALTH CENTER: $70,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLEADERSHIP LANCASTER INC: $68,950 over 5y, 7.7% of budgetPATIENTS R WAITING INC: $65,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $63,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY: $60,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN SERVICES: $60,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER FARMLAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LANCASTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE CONESTOGA CREEK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF LANCASTER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER CITY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION MIDATLANTIC ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTERHISTORYORG ↗
  • Who funds WATER SCIENCE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds TOUCHSTONE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LA ACADEMIATHE PARTNERSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL MARKET TRUST ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER DAY CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FIRST FUND ↗
  • Who funds TENFOLD COMMUNITY LENDING ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER COUNTY CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds NEW TECH NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds Music for Everyone ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT SIDE OPPORTUNITIES CORPORATI ↗
  • Who funds SUSAN P BYRNES HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TENFOLD ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THADDEUS STEVENS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lancaster County Community FoundationPA169.5× affinity89 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lancaster County Community Foundation · High Foundation · Clark Associates Charitable Foundation · United Way of Lancaster County · Ferree Foundation · Willis and Elsie Shenk Foundation · Ppl Foundation · Fulton Family Foundation · Pryor E & Arlene R Neuber Charitable Trust · City Limits Foundation · Dart Foundation fka Solid Waste Management Foundation · The Abigail L Longenecker Memorial Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Steinman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Steinman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    39report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Steinman Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Steinman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 303 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Steinman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph