Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

City Limits Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$725k
Granted FY2024still arriving
45
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$106k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

Education$388kYouth Development$310kHealth$94kHousing & Shelter$77kFood & Nutrition$71kHuman Services$59kRecreation & Sports$56kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $409k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $266k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EVOLVE YOUTH TRADES ACADEMY INC$106,088
LANCASTER COUNTY FOOD HUB$55,000
CHILDREN DESERVE A CHANCE FOUNDATION DBA ATTOLLO$55,000
PA STEAM ACADEMY$50,000
LANCASTER DOLLARS FOR HIGHER LEARNING$42,200
COMMUNITY FIRST FUND$40,000
BRIGHT SIDE OPPORTUNITIES CENTER$29,500
TENFOLD$25,000
LA ACADEMIA PARTNERSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL$25,000
HORIZONS AT LANCASTER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$25,000
BENCH MARK PROGRAM$25,000
LANCASTER EARLY EDUCATION CENTER$23,500
GIRLS ON THE RUN LANCASTER$20,000
LANCASTER LEBANON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC$20,000
EBENEZER BAPTIST CHURCH$17,400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%BRO2GO LLC: $3k → 12%POWER PACKS PROJECT: $5k → 9%POWER PACKS PROJECT: $5k → 9%LANCASTER EARLY EDUCATION CENTER: $25k → 9%LANCASTER EARLY EDUCATION CENTER: $24k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of City Limits Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in PA; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

City Limits Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$792k · 23 repeat orgs$455k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against -13% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
6

Total granted

$792k
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
-13%

Still filing today

74%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $392k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EducationHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsReligionArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LD
    LANCASTER DOLLARS FOR HIGHER LEARNING
    3× · 2022–2024 · $127k · revenue +25%
  • LC
    LANCASTER COUNTY FOOD HUB
    3× · 2022–2024 · $61k · revenue +72%
  • PR
    PATIENTS R WAITING INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $52k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • MD
    MENNONITE DISASTER SERVICE
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • TC
    THE CLINIC FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -22%
  • S
    SACA
    one grant, 2023 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lancaster Community Safety Coalition

Enhance public safety and the quality of life in lancaster by engaging the community and advancing current crime prevention strategies.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Assets Lancaster

Assets lancaster is a non-profit that works with start-up and existing businesses to form a more equitable and ethical economy. assets lancaster offers in-depth training and financing for entrepreneurs, and works with established…

Community Improvement
3
Lancaster County Council of the Arts

To enrich the quality of life in Lancaster County by building vibrant and inclusive communities connecting arts, culture, education, and economic vitality.

Arts & Culture
4
Lancaster Law Foundation

We promote equal access to justice for all in lancaster county by funding public interest law projects, delivering pro bono service, and educating the public on civic and legal issues.

Crime & Legal
5
Lancaster Medical Society Foundatio
6
Literacy Council of Lanc-Leb Lva

Our mission is success through lifelong learning and learning for life. our vision is for adults to have the skills to transform their lives, sustain their families and strengthen their communities.

Education
7
The Arc of Lancaster County

Empowering people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (i/dd) and their families to lead full, satisfying, independent lives of their choice.

Health
8
Lancaster Preschool

Lancaster preschool believes that the preschool is an extension of the home environment where children can learn new skills, interact with teachers and peers, and experience hands-on learning opportunities through developmentally…

Education
9
Lancaster Equity Inc

Lancaster equity coordinates efforts to advance communities where everyone has an opportunity to thrive, whether that be through neighborhood revitalization, living wage work, entrepreneurship, or safe and affordable housing.

Housing & Shelter
10
Leadership Lancaster Inc

Develop outstanding community leadership to support the needs of lancaster county.

Public Benefit
11
Friends of Lancaster University in America Inc

To promote education, particularly higher eduation.

Education
12
The Lancaster County Partners for Youth
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lancaster Country Day School and the most unlike its peers is Now I Can Foundation Northeast. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%8%<5yr15%18%5–10yr21%18%10–20yr17%18%20–35yr14%16%35–55yr13%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%3%<5yr15%11%5–10yr21%23%10–20yr17%22%20–35yr14%7%35–55yr13%35%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/41
the rest of the field
8%
235/2,774

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
17/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EVOLVE YOUTH TRADES ACADEMY INC — $200,155 · OtherEVOLVE YOUTH TRADES ACADEMY INCLANCASTER DOLLARS FOR HIGHER LEARNING — $127,200 · OtherLANCASTER DOLLARS FOR HIGHER LEARNINGCHILDREN DESERVE A CHANCE FOUNDATION DBA ATTOLLO — $55,000 · OtherCHILDREN DESERVE A CHANCE FOUNDATION DBA ATTOLLOPA STEAM ACADEMY — $50,000 · OtherPA STEAM ACADEMYMENNONITE DISASTER SERVICE — $50,000 · OtherMENNONITE DISASTER SERVICETENFOLD — $40,000 · OtherTENFOLDBENCH MARK PROGRAM — $25,000 · Other+27 more — $197,300 · Other+27 morePLANT THE SEED OF LEARNING INC — $90,000 · Recreation & SportsPLANT THE SE…BRIGHT SIDE OPPORTUNITIES CORPORATI — $29,500 · Recreation & SportsBRIGHT SIDE …THE COMMON WHEEL — $15,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE COMMON W…LANCASTER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $50,000 · EducationLANCASTER …LA ACADEMIATHE PARTNERSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL — $25,000 · EducationLA ACADEMI…LANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY — $20,000 · EducationLANCASTER …THE JANUS SCHOOL — $10,000 · EducationTHE JANUS …LANCASTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $6,000 · EducationLANCASTER …PATIENTS R WAITING INC — $52,000 · HealthJEFF MUSSER FOUNDATION — $20,000 · HealthLANCASTER COUNTY FOOD HUB — $61,000 · ReligionPOWERED TO MOVE — $4,000 · ReligionBIBLE2SCHOOL — $2,300 · ReligionLANCASTER DAY CARE CENTER — $48,500 · Human ServicesPOWER PACKS PROJECT — $10,000 · Human ServicesBRO2GO LLC — $2,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FIRST FUND — $40,000 · Housing & ShelterCHESTNUT HOUSING CORPORATION — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterHAND UP PARTNERS — $5,000 · Housing & ShelterSOUTH ANN CONCERNED NEIGHBORS INC — $2,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$744,655Recreation & Sports$134,500Education$111,000Health$72,000Religion$67,300Human Services$61,000Housing & Shelter$57,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLANCASTER DOLLARS FOR HIGHER LEARNING — $127,200 over 3y, 13% of budgetLANCASTER COUNTY FOOD HUB — $61,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetPATIENTS R WAITING INC — $52,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetLANCASTER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLANCASTER DAY CARE CENTER — $48,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FIRST FUND — $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTENFOLD — $40,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBRIGHT SIDE OPPORTUNITIES CORPORATI — $29,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetLA ACADEMIATHE PARTNERSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBENCH MARK PROGRAM — $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetLANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJEFF MUSSER FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetLANCASTER AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN OF LANCASTER — $20,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTHE COMMON WHEEL — $15,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTOUCHSTONE FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetTHE JANUS SCHOOL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPOWER PACKS PROJECT — $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHESTNUT HOUSING CORPORATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNOW I CAN FOUNDATION NORTHEAST — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLANCASTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL AMBUCS INC ALTOONA CHAPTER — $6,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetHAND UP PARTNERS — $5,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetTHE CLINIC FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLANCASTER SCIENCE CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPOWERED TO MOVE — $4,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetJUSTICE & MERCY INC — $2,800 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetBRO2GO LLC — $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBIBLE2SCHOOL — $2,300 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLONG'S PARK AMPHITHEATER FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTH ANN CONCERNED NEIGHBORS INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLANCASTER COUNTY CONSERVANCY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFULTON THEATRE COMPANY — $850 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lancaster County Community FoundationPA63.4× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lancaster County Community Foundation · The Steinman Foundation · Clark Associates Charitable Foundation · High Foundation · United Way of Lancaster County · Fulton Family Foundation · Willis and Elsie Shenk Foundation · Ferree Foundation · High Foundation · Thomas a and Georgina T Russo Foundation · Pryor E & Arlene R Neuber Charitable Trust · Northwest Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization City Limits Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph