Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Stanton Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$140k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$158kEducation$86kPhilanthropy$60kAnimals$40kHuman Services$32kHealth$15kInternational$15kArts & Culture$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LAWRENCE OF BRINDISI CATHOLIC$35,000
WYOMING CATHOLIC COLLEGE$25,000
MERCY HOME FOR BOYS & GIRLS$20,000
BOYS TOWN$10,000
ST JOSEPH INDIAN SCHOOL$10,000
ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$10,000
MARY'S MEALS$10,000
THE ASPCA$10,000
DOMINICAN SISTERS OF MARY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BOYS TOWN: $10k → 12%JOHN GEORGE HOME INC: $1k → 13%JOHN GEORGE HOME INC: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
WY
SD
IN
NJ
CA
NE
TN
MS
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$241k · 10 repeat orgs$187k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$241k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+13%

Still filing today

30%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
Human ServicesInternationalArts & CultureEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2017–2019 · $70k
  • SL
    ST LAWRENCE OF BRINDISI CHURCH
    2× · 2022–2023 · $53k
  • SH
    SACRED HEART SOUTHERN MISSIONS
    3× · 2018–2021 · $51k

Funded once

  • EM
    EASTERN MI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • LC
    LUMIN CHRISTI CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
  • LC
    LUMEN CHRISTI CATHOLIC HI
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Benedictine College

Benedictine college's mission as a catholic, benedictine, liberal arts, residential college is the education of men and women within a community of faith & scholarship.

Education
2
University of Saint Joseph

The university provides a rigorous liberal arts and professional education for a diverse student population. (see schedule o for the organization's mission.)

Education
3
Siena University

Siena university is a learning community advancing the ideals of a liberal arts education, rooted in its identity as a franciscan and catholic institution. as a learning community, siena is committed to a student-centered education…

Education
4
Georgian Court University

Georgian court university (gcu), provides a comprehensive liberal arts education and is open to students of all faiths, delivers a curriculum that promotes scholarship, service, and personal development.

Education
5
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education
6
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
7
Newman University Inc

We are a catholic university named for saint john henry newman and founded by the adorers of the blood of christ for the purpose of empowering graduates to transform society. our core values (see schedule o for continuation)

Education
8
Marymount Manhattan College

Marymount manhattan college is an urban, independent, liberal arts college (see schedule o).

Education
9
Desales University

Desales is a catholic, salesian university that inspires transformative learning through the liberal arts and professional studies by energizing students to be who they are and be that well.

Education
10
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
11
University of Notre Dame du Lac

See Schedule O. See explanation for Form 990, Part I, Line 1 - Organization's Mission above.

Education
12
The Academy of the New Church

The mission of the academy is to study and teach the truths of the natural and spiritual worlds in the light of the old testament, the new testament, and the writings of emanuel swedenborg. this is done at the academy of the new church…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is St Louis Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $70,122 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherTHE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONST LAWRENCE OF BRINDISI CHURCH: $53,381 · OtherST LAWRENCE OF BRINDISI CHURCHSACRED HEART SOUTHERN MISSIONS: $51,000 · OtherSACRED HEART SOUTHERN MISSIONSST LAWRENCE OF BRINDISI CATHOLIC: $35,000 · OtherST LAWRENCE OF BRINDISI CATHOLICEMU FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherEMU FOUNDATIONEASTERN MI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherMERCY HOME FOR BOYS & GIRLS: $20,000 · OtherLUMEN CHRISTI HIGH SCHOOL: $18,000 · Other+10 more: $64,200 · Other+10 moreWyoming Catholic College: $25,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationMary's Meals USA Inc: $10,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 · InternationalFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $10,000 · Human ServicesJOHN GEORGE HOME INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $10,000 · AnimalsGLEN ARBOR ARTS CENTER: $4,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$421,703Education$30,000International$15,000Human Services$12,000Animals$10,000Arts & Culture$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWyoming Catholic College: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMary's Meals USA Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLEN ARBOR ARTS CENTER: $4,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJOHN GEORGE HOME INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Wyoming Catholic College ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Mary's Meals USA Inc ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GLEN ARBOR ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JOHN GEORGE HOME INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stanton Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stanton Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stanton’s filings →

    More from the funding graph