Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Stahl Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$171kHealth$89kAnimals$46kReligion$40kArts & Culture$22kRecreation & Sports$20kHuman Services$19kHousing & Shelter$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$746k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY HARVEST$10,000
FOOD BANK NYC$10,000
GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER$10,000
THE BOWERY MISSION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
ANIMAL HAVEN$1,500
SUNRISE DAY CAMP$1,500
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$1,000
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY$1,000
GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND$1,000
SPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC$1,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK$1,000
GIMME SHELTER ANIMAL RESCUE$1,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$1,000
SMILE TRAIN$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GUIDING EYES: $5k → 9%THE GOOD DOG FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%SUNRISE DAY CAMP: $2k → 11%GUIDING EYES: $5k → 9%THE GOOD DOG FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 9%ISLAND HARVEST: $500 → 7%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 9%GUIDING EYES: $3k → 9%GUIDING EYES: $3k → 9%GUIDING EYES: $1k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IA
PA
NJ
CO
MO
VA
AR
TN
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$438k · 37 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
15

Total granted

$438k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+18%

Still filing today

65%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CITY HARVEST INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $47k · revenue +75%
  • GL
    GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +226%
  • FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • TY
    THE YORKVILLE COMMUNITY PANTRY
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • SC
    SHRINER'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Care and Control of New York City Inc

Animal care centers of nyc's (acc) mission is to end animal homelessness in nyc.

Animals
2
New York Blood Center Inc

As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.

Health
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
5
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
6
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
7
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
8
National Foundation for Cancer Research

To support cancer research and public education relating to prevention, earlier diagnosis, better treatments and ultimately, a cure for cancer.

Health
9
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
10
Animal Rescue League of Boston

The animal rescue league of boston's vision is to confront animal cruelty and neglect at its root causes. through programs, services, and facilities focused on accessible animal care, public advocacy, and sustained anti-cruelty efforts...…

Animals
11
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
12
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The National Children's Cancer Society; the most unlike its peers is Dancing Dreams. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/37
Grantees still filing
25/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOOD BANK OF NY: $43,000 · OtherFOOD BANK OF NYIndividual grant recipient: $15,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSUNRISE DAY CAMP: $15,000 · OtherSUNRISE DAY CAMPRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE - NY: $15,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE - NYSMILE TRAIN INC: $14,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INCSHREINERS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $12,500 · OtherSHREINERS CHILDREN'S HOSPITALST JUDE'S: $12,500 · OtherST JUDE'SALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $12,000 · OtherALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $10,000 · OtherHEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $7,320 · Other+31 more: $50,000 · Other+31 moreCITY HARVEST INC: $47,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INCGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $39,500 · Food & NutritionGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER …FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $4,750 · Food & NutritionGimme Shelter Animal Rescue Inc: $15,000 · AnimalsGimme Shel…ANIMAL HAVEN INC: $7,500 · AnimalsANIMAL HAV…ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS INC: $6,500 · AnimalsANIMAL RES…THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $4,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERIC…SPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC: $3,750 · AnimalsSPCA OF WE…AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · AnimalsAFRICAN WI…BIDEAWEE INC: $2,250 · Animals+1 more: $250 · AnimalsGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $27,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,500 · Human ServicesTHE GOOD DOG FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,500 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $30,000 · Community ImprovementChristian Herald Association Inc: $27,500 · ReligionTHE PARRISH ART MUSEUM INC: $13,000 · Arts & CultureDANCING DREAMS: $8,750 · Arts & Culture
Other$216,820Food & Nutrition$91,250Animals$42,250Human Services$36,500Community Improvement$30,000Religion$27,500Arts & Culture$21,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $47,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $39,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Herald Association Inc: $27,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $27,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGimme Shelter Animal Rescue Inc: $15,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $14,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PARRISH ART MUSEUM INC: $13,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDANCING DREAMS: $8,750 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetANIMAL HAVEN INC: $7,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOLIVIA'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $4,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $4,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC: $3,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIDEAWEE INC: $2,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOOD DOG FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISLAND HARVEST LTD: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREVENT CHILD ABUSE AMERICA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Women International: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLung Cancer Alliance: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds Christian Herald Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds Gimme Shelter Animal Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PARRISH ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds DANCING DREAMS ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS INC ↗
  • Who funds OLIVIA'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds SPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BIDEAWEE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GOOD DOG FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stahl Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stahl Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stahl Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph