Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Squiggy Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$20kYouth Development$14kSocial Science$750Arts & Culture$500Environment$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$16k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SOIL HEALTH ACADEMY: $500 → 11%PICO YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER: $3k → 14%WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 7%PICO YOUTH FAMILY CENTER: $2k → 14%WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 7%PICO YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER: $2k → 14%WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 7%PICO YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER: $2k → 14%WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 7%PICO YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER: $500 → 14%THE SHARK FUND: $4k → 14%THE SHARK FUND: $4k → 14%THE SHARK FUND: $3k → 14%THE SHARK FUND: $2k → 14%THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA: $2k → 14%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MALIBU: $1k → 14%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MALIBU: $1k → 14%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MALIBU: $500 → 14%BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF MALIBU: $500 → 14%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MALIBU: $500 → 14%MALIBU OPTIMIST CLUB: $250 → 14%MALIBU OPTIMIST CLUB: $250 → 14%MISCELLANEOUS: $250 → 14%MALIBU OPTIMIST CLUB: $250 → 14%THE HOBART SHAKESPEAREANS: $500 → 14%THE HOBART SHAKESPEREANS: $500 → 14%SANTA MONICA-MALIBU EDUCATION FDN: $1k → 14%SANTA MONICA - MALIBU EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $700 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$31k · 6 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$31k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+39%

Still filing today

83%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SHARK FUND
    4× · 2017–2020 · $12k · revenue +47%
  • PY
    PICO YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER
    4× · 2017–2021 · $7k · revenue +304%
  • WU
    WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $6k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • PY
    PICO YOUTH FAMILY CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • TB
    THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • BG
    BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF MALIBU
    one grant, 2023 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The California Academy Foundation

The California Academy Foundation's mission is to raise funds to support the educational and extra curricular objectives of the Multimedia Arts and Design Academy, a school within Santa Barbara High School, a public school in Santa Barbara…

Education
2
San Gabriel Educational Foundation

Support programs at schools in SGVUSD

Education
3
San Francisco High School of the Arts

San Francisco Arts and Science Academy (ASA) provides TK5 grade students with a strong foundation in the arts, language, math, and science, fostering creativity, curiosity, and character development. Our bilingual, hands-on curriculum…

Education
4
Terra Marin School

Our mission is to spark wonder and intellectual curiosity in each child. We achieve this through a purposeful blend of:Engaging academics custom-tailored to each child's abilities, strengths and interests;An unparalleled social-emotional…

Education
5
Friends of Monterey Academy of Oceanographic Science

The Monterey Academy of Oceanographic Science, located at Monterey High School, prepares public high school students from throughout Monterey County for academic and career success. This is accomplished through a challenging curriculum…

Education
6
Santa Monica High School Parents Teacher Association

Promote the welfare of youth in home, school & community.

—
7
Mercury Music Foundation

Provide outstanding music programs for students aged 5 to 22 that can create a positive impact on their lives.

Education
8
Saint Ann's School

Saint ann's exists to nurture the wonder of children. unfettered by grades, teachers and students embark on journeys of discovery in which the arts are central. through an ambitious curriculum and a culture of inquiry, we question the…

Education
9
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
10
The Salish Sea School

The salish sea schools mission is to awaken curiosity and deepen connections with the sea through shore and sea exploration programs for all ages.

Environment
11
Resourceful Impact in Scholastic Education
Education
12
Pomona College

Throughout its history, pomona college has educated men and women of exceptional promise. we gather individuals, regardless of financial circumstances, into a small residential community that is strongly rooted in southern california yet…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Emily Shane Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Wesleyan University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHARK FUND: $12,000 · EducationSHARK FUNDWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $6,493 · EducationWESLEYAN UNIVERSITYPICO YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER: $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentPICO YOUTH & FAMILY CENTERMALIBU FOUNDATION FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentMALIBU FOUNDATION FOR YOUTH AND…+1 more: $250 · Youth DevelopmentPICO YOUTH FAMILY CENTER: $2,000 · OtherPICO YOUTH FAMILY CENT…Santa Monica Education Foundation: $1,700 · OtherSanta Monica Education…THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA: $1,500 · OtherTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLU…MALIBU OPTIMIST CLUB: $750 · OtherMALIBU OPTIMIST CLUBBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF MALIBU: $500 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF MAL…Individual grant recipient: $500 · OtherIndividual grant recip…MISCELLANEOUS: $250 · OtherSOIL HEALTH ACADEMY: $500 · EnvironmentHobart Shakespeareans: $500 · Arts & Culture
Education$18,493Youth Development$10,250Other$7,200Environment$500Arts & Culture$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPICO YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER: $7,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $6,493 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMALIBU FOUNDATION FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES: $3,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSOIL HEALTH ACADEMY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHobart Shakespeareans: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE EMILY SHANE FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHARK FUND ↗
  • Who funds PICO YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MALIBU FOUNDATION FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds Santa Monica Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SOIL HEALTH ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Hobart Shakespeareans ↗
  • Who funds THE EMILY SHANE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Squiggy Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Squiggy Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Wesleyan University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Squiggy Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Squiggy Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Squiggy’s filings →

More from the funding graph