Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Spidell Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$53kArts & Culture$37kEducation$30kHealth$25kHuman Services$18kYouth Development$9kPhilanthropy$5kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$993k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Glenwood Springs High School$13,500
Return to Dirt Foundation$10,000
Church at Woodmoor$7,000
Natl Museum WWII Aviation$5,000
First UMC$5,000
Glenwood Springs Summer of Music$4,000
Court Care for the Pikes Peak Regio$3,000
Ronald McDonald House of So Colorad$2,000
Women's Crisis Services$2,000
Rotary Foundation$1,000
Kiwanis Club of Monument$1,000
Rocky Mountain PBS$500
Palmer Lake Historical Society$500
Western Museum of MiningIndustry$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Advocate Safe House Project: $2k → 8%Advocate Safe House Project: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$147k · 18 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
17

Total granted

$147k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+735%

Still filing today

28%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RT
    Return to Dirt
    6× · 2019–2025 · $20k · revenue +72%
  • WM
    WESTERN MUSEUM OF MINING & INDUSTRY
    6× · 2019–2025 · $7k · revenue +46%
  • GS
    Glenwood Springs Summer of Music Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • RM
    Ronald McDonald House Charities of
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • SS
    Skylark School
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rocky Mountain Corporation for Public Broadcasting
—
2
Steamboat Springs Free Summer Concert Series

Produce annual summer music series

Arts & Culture
3
The Glenwood Springs Historical Society Inc

To educate the public about the history of our area.

Arts & Culture
4
The Rocky Mountain Mining Institute

Rmmi is a non profit corporation dedicated to the promotion of western coal through education. member states are arizona, colorado, montana, new mexico, north dakota, texas, utah, and wyoming. the institute is proud to claim members from…

Employment
5
Gunnison Council for the Arts

The Gunnison Arts Center creates community through the arts by providing accessible and inclusive programs, events, and educational experiences that foster creativity, support local artists, and enrich lives.

Arts & Culture
6
Rocky Mountain Ballet Theatre
Arts & Culture
7
Rocky Mountain Pathways
—
8
Fraser Valley Community Media Inc

Fraser Valley Community Media operates community radio stations KFFR 88.3 FM and KWTR 89.1 FM to unite Grand County, Colorado, by broadcasting local music, news, cultural programming, youth education, and civic information.

Arts & Culture
9
Destination Colorado Meetings

a member based state association of over 100 companies targeting meeting planners & incentive buyers. members include bureaus, hotels, resorts, destination management companies, activity companies, & other meeting services. we are…

—
10
Ouray County Historical Society

Historical Society for Ouray County, Colorado Museum, Historical Programs, mining, ranching and indian exhibit and artifacts, archiving historical documents and historical programs for the general public.

—
11
Colorado Springs Pioneers Museum

To build a lasting connection to the pikes peak region by preserving and sharing our cultural history. this mission is accomplished through our support of the colorado springs pioneers museum, owned and operated by the city of colorado…

Arts & Culture
12
Rocky Mountain World Trade Center Association

The rocky mountain world trade center association provides sustained value to its constituents by being the private sector focal point for international business in denver and throughout the rocky mountain region.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rocky Mountain Public Media Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Mountain Club Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHURCH AT WOODMOOR INC: $48,000 · OtherCHURCH AT WOODMOOR INCReturn to Dirt: $19,500 · OtherReturn to DirtGlenwood Springs High School: $15,500 · OtherGlenwood Springs High SchoolRonald McDonald House Charities of: $10,000 · OtherRonald McDonald House Charities ofIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+27 more: $65,750 · Other+27 moreTRI LAKES CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $11,700 · Arts & CultureTRI LAKES CEN…WESTERN MUSEUM OF MINING & INDUSTRY: $7,000 · Arts & CultureWESTERN MUSEU…Glenwood Springs Summer of Music Inc: $5,500 · Arts & CultureGlenwood Spri…+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureRaising A Reader: $3,000 · EducationNEW CASTLE LEARNING ADVANTAGE: $3,000 · EducationADVOCATE SAFEHOUSE PROJECT: $3,000 · Human ServicesGLENWOOD SPRINGS CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Community Improvement
Other$168,750Arts & Culture$24,700Education$6,000Human Services$3,000Community Improvement$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetReturn to Dirt: $19,500 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetTRI LAKES CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $11,700 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetWESTERN MUSEUM OF MINING & INDUSTRY: $7,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetGlenwood Springs Summer of Music Inc: $5,500 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetADVOCATE SAFEHOUSE PROJECT: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRaising A Reader: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW CASTLE LEARNING ADVANTAGE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPALMER LAKE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetGLENWOOD SPRINGS CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Return to Dirt ↗
  • Who funds TRI LAKES CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN MUSEUM OF MINING & INDUSTRY ↗
  • Who funds Glenwood Springs Summer of Music Inc ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATE SAFEHOUSE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Raising A Reader ↗
  • Who funds NEW CASTLE LEARNING ADVANTAGE ↗
  • Who funds PALMER LAKE HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds The Mountain Club Ltd ↗
  • Who funds GLENWOOD SPRINGS CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS CRISIS SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Spidell Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Spidell Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Spidell’s filings →

    More from the funding graph