Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Soul Support Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0182% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$15kReligion$7kFood & Nutrition$4kHuman Services$4kCrime & Legal$3kPhilanthropy$3kArts & Culture$3kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$750
Median grant
7
States reached
$138k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HADAR INSTITUTE$5,000
GLOBAL VILLAGE CONNECT$2,250
TUCSON HEBREW ACADEMY$1,800
SOUTH COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$1,700
HARRELL FOUNDATION$1,000
JEWISH WOMEN'S FOUNDATION$750
Individual grant recipient$600
JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE BERKSHIRES$500
SOUTHERN BERKSHIRE VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD INC$500
EDUCATION MATTERS INC$500
18 DEGREES$250
PEACE THROUGH COMMUNITY INC$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%GLOBAL VILLAGE CONNECT: $2k → 11%GLOBAL VILLAGE CONNECT: $500 → 11%RAINBOW DEFENSE FUND: $500 → 15%RAINBOW DEFENSE FUND: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
WI
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
AZ
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

32%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$16k · 8 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
33

Total granted

$16k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+0%

Still filing today

63%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalEducationHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HADAR INSTITUTE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6k
  • TH
    TUCSON HEBREW ACADEMY
    2× · 2023–2025 · $3k · revenue -12%
  • GV
    GLOBAL VILLAGE CONNECT
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • SC
    ST CATHERINE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • TS
    The Shalem Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -49%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
2
The Jerusalem Connection
3
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
4
Friends of Jerusalem

Friends of Jerusalem's mission is to provide assistance to the needs and indigent living in Jerusalem and all of Israel.

Human Services
5
American Friends of Torah and Tefilah Ramat Eshkol Inc

To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.

Religion
6
American Friends of the Jerusalem Great Synagogue Inc

To provide for the needs of the great synagogue in jerusalem israel.

Religion
7
Sherit Isroel
8
Jewish Food Society Inc

Jewish food society works to preserve and celebrate jewish culinary heritage from around the world in order to increase awareness and deepen connections to jewish life. jfs is committed to showcasing the diversity of the jewish experience,…

Arts & Culture
9
Partners in Torah

Offering jewish adults a personal connection to judaism,fostering a sense of belonging to the greater jewishcommunity, and building bridges between jews of allbackgrounds. to date, over 74,000 men and women from 39countries have been…

Religion
10
Adi Israel Foundation Inc

Aleh Israel Foundation, Inc.(The Foundation)is a Foundation that provides support to rehabilitative centers caring for most severely disabled children in Israel.

International
11
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
12
Jewish Film Institute

The Jewish Film Institute champions bold films and filmmakers that expand and evolve the Jewish story for audiences everywhere. Through its exhibition and artist development programs, JFI celebrates the spirit of film, inquiry,…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of the Berkshires and the most unlike its peers is The Harrell Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%10%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr16%12%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,543

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST CATHERINE SCHOOL — $10,000 · OtherST CATHERINE SCHOOLHADAR INSTITUTE — $6,100 · OtherHADAR INSTITUTEIndividual grant recipient — $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIENDS OF ONO COLLEGE — $1,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $1,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $1,400 · Other+28 more — $12,770 · Other+28 moreGLOBAL VILLAGE CONNECT — $2,750 · Human ServicesRAINBOW DEFENSE FUND INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesThe Shalem Foundation — $3,000 · Crime & LegalTUCSON HEBREW ACADEMY — $2,800 · EducationLITERACY INC — $100 · EducationPITTSFIELD COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC — $1,700 · Food & NutritionALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC — $500 · Food & NutritionSHAKESPEARE & COMPANY INC — $1,000 · Arts & CultureBERKSHIRE THEATRE GROUP INC — $500 · Arts & CultureAMERICA-ISRAEL CULTURAL FOUNDATION INC — $200 · Arts & CultureNEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC — $500 · InternationalCentral Fund of Israel — $500 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $250 · International
Other$35,570Human Services$3,750Crime & Legal$3,000Education$2,900Food & Nutrition$2,200Arts & Culture$1,700International$1,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Shalem Foundation — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTUCSON HEBREW ACADEMY — $2,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL VILLAGE CONNECT — $2,750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSHAKESPEARE & COMPANY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAINBOW DEFENSE FUND INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget18 DEGREES INC — $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBERKSHIRE THEATRE GROUP INC — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION WARRIOR RESOLUTION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHancock Shaker Village Inc — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA-ISRAEL CULTURAL FOUNDATION INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITERACY INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Shalem Foundation
  • Who funds TUCSON HEBREW ACADEMY
  • Who funds GLOBAL VILLAGE CONNECT
  • Who funds PITTSFIELD COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds SHAKESPEARE & COMPANY INC
  • Who funds RAINBOW DEFENSE FUND INC
  • Who funds 18 DEGREES INC
  • Who funds NEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE THEATRE GROUP INC
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE BERKSHIRES
  • Who funds ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds SOUTHERN BERKSHIRE VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
  • Who funds OPERATION WARRIOR RESOLUTION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY23.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · The Greater Barrington Foundation Inc Dba the Barrington Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Dobbins Foundation Co Michele Dodge Director · Kmd Foundation · Jane and Jack Fitzpatrick Trust · The Feigenbaum Foundation Inc · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Fjc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Soul Support Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • 18 Degrees Inc60% of income from government
  • Hancock Shaker Village Inc1% of income from government
  • Shakespeare & Company Inc1% of income from government
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc1% of income from government
  • Berkshire Theatre Group Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph