Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sorala Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$502k
Granted FY2025still arriving
211
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Youth Development$748kReligion$694kHuman Services$565kPhilanthropy$211kHealth$145kEducation$39kInternational$10kCivil Rights$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 211 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k206 grants · $259k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $173k
$600
Median grant
12
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Chaviva Foundation$100,000
The Donors Fund$72,572
Individual grant recipient$31,500
Individual grant recipient$25,160
Congregation Gates of Mercy$13,500
Individual grant recipient$9,750
Khal Machzikei Torah$9,000
Individual grant recipient$7,810
Yeshiva Nesiv HaTalmud$7,600
Congregation Chaim V'Chessed$7,500
Individual grant recipient$6,400
Individual grant recipient$6,000
Yeshiva Gedola Tiferes Yaakov Yitzchok$5,100
Torah Links$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Tzidkas Avraham: $180 → 28%Gemach of Jackson: $5k → 11%Gemach of Jackson: $1k → 11%Davis Memorial Fund: $180 → 6%American Friends of Yad Eliezer: $1k → 11%Chicago Chesed Fund: $200 → 14%Chicago Chessed Fund: $100 → 14%Gemach of Jackson: $100 → 11%Relief Resources: $10k → 11%Relief Resources: $10k → 11%Israel Magen Fund: $1k → 14%Ray of Hope: $360 → 14%Community Legacy Foundation: $100 → 14%Zichron Mattel: $2k → 11%Oorah: $2k → 11%Keren Hatzedaka: $2k → 11%Relief Resources: $2k → 11%A Time: $360 → 20%A Time: $200 → 20%ATime: $180 → 20%Ahavas Tzedaka: $965 → 11%Ahavas Tzedaka: $903 → 11%A Time: $180 → 20%Ahavas Tzedaka: $860 → 11%Ozer Dalim of Lakewood: $860 → 11%Keren Hatzedaka: $813 → 11%Ahavas Tzedaka: $773 → 11%Zichron Mattel: $650 → 11%Matan B'seser Bambi: $100 → 20%Kimpatorin Aid: $50 → 20%Kimpatorin Aid: $36 → 20%Keren Hatzedaka: $540 → 11%Keren Hatzedaka: $531 → 11%Chai4ever: $444 → 11%Ahavas Tzedaka: $360 → 11%Helping Out People Everyday: $360 → 11%Keren Simchas Chaim: $255 → 11%Ozer Dalim of Lakewood: $250 → 11%Techonology Awareness Group: $216 → 11%Chasdei Nochum: $180 → 11%Ezer L'Yisroel: $150 → 11%Oorah: $130 → 11%Oorah: $125 → 11%Oorah: $115 → 11%Ahavas Tzedaka: $100 → 11%Oorah: $100 → 11%Chai4ever: $20 → 11%Batya Girls: $18 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MD
AZ
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 257 repeat orgs$493k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

257 repeat relationships: 123 still active in FY2025, 134 since wound down; 86 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

257
392

Total granted

$2.0M
$380k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
0%

Still filing today

26%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    ACHIM INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $28k · revenue +23%
  • TF
    TZUR FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $27k · revenue +28%
  • RR
    RELIEF RESOURCES INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $22k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • KZ
    KEREN ZICHRON MENACHEM
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
  • AY
    AGUDAS YISROEL OF WEST LAWRENCE
    one grant, 2024 · $11k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
4
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
5
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Mesivta Keren Orah

To conduct and maintain a religious school in accordance with the tenets, traditions and precepts of the orthodox jewish faith.

Education
7
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
8
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
9
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
10
Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
11
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
12
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mesivta Meromei Tzvi Inc; the most unlike its peers is Camp Extreme D/B/a Project Extreme. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

144 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 144 of the 739 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
137/144
Grantees still filing
84/144
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $104,930 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTorah Links: $54,010 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $45,750 · Other+169 more: $1,038,123 · Other+169 moreTHE CHAVIVA FOUNDATION: $730,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CHAVIVA FOUNDATIONDONORS FUND INC: $202,572 · PhilanthropyDONORS FUND INCBAYIT CHAM: $113,410 · PhilanthropyBAYIT CHAM+1 more: $3,180 · PhilanthropyACHIM INC: $28,380 · ReligionTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $27,255 · ReligionYESHIVAS TORAS ZEV INC: $6,020 · ReligionKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $5,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS MONTREAL INC: $3,660 · ReligionTORAS HAMISHPACHA TAHAREINU: $2,900 · ReligionVAAD HARABBANIM L'INYANEI TZEDUKA INC: $2,734 · Religion+2 more: $4,275 · ReligionEDUCATIONAL ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $31,500 · EducationLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $7,975 · EducationYESHIVA CHAYEI OLAM: $5,484 · EducationBAIS TOVA INC: $4,250 · EducationYESHIVAS KESSER YONAH: $3,310 · EducationBNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $2,700 · EducationRELIEF RESOURCES INC: $21,500 · Human ServicesGEMACH OF JACKSON INC: $5,816 · Human ServicesKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $4,499 · Human ServicesAHAVAS TZEDAKA INC: $3,961 · Human ServicesZichron Mattel Inc: $2,450 · Human ServicesOORAH INC: $2,070 · Human ServicesCHESED OF LAKEWOOD INC: $4,065 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $3,805 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOLEL SHAAREI SIMCHA: $1,800 · International
Other$1,242,813Philanthropy$1,049,162Religion$80,224Education$55,219Human Services$40,296Health$7,870International$1,800

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHAVIVA FOUNDATION: $730,000 over 3y, 97% of budgetDONORS FUND INC: $202,572 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBAYIT CHAM: $113,410 over 4y, 38% of budgetEDUCATIONAL ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $31,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetACHIM INC: $28,380 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $27,255 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRELIEF RESOURCES INC: $21,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $7,975 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA TORAS CHAIM INC: $6,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAS TORAS ZEV INC: $6,020 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetGEMACH OF JACKSON INC: $5,816 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA CHAYEI OLAM: $5,484 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $4,499 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS TOVA INC: $4,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESED OF LAKEWOOD INC: $4,065 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAHAVAS TZEDAKA INC: $3,961 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $3,930 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $3,805 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS MONTREAL INC: $3,660 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVAS KESSER YONAH: $3,310 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHUVU RETURN INC: $3,180 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTORAS HAMISHPACHA TAHAREINU: $2,900 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetVAAD HARABBANIM L'INYANEI TZEDUKA INC: $2,734 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $2,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZichron Mattel Inc: $2,450 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMCHON KISVEI R ELYA BORUCH INC: $2,275 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetOORAH INC: $2,070 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetIYUN HAPARSHA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOLEL SHAAREI SIMCHA: $1,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHAVIVA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DONORS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BAYIT CHAM ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATIONAL ENDOWMENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ACHIM INC ↗
  • Who funds TZUR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RELIEF RESOURCES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY89.1× affinity67 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Donors Fund Inc · The Ojc Fund · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · The Jmg Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · The Fishoff Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Keren Yud Mem Inc · Toras Chesed Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sorala Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sorala Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 540%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Mesoras Hatorah Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Chayei Olam: 10% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Nachlei Torah Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Toras Aron Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Bais Tova Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Tiferes Torah Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Jewels School Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Chai 4EVER Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Mesorah Heritage Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Oorah Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Yehudi Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
54get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Sorala Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Sorala Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 739 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sorala’s filings →

More from the funding graph