Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sondheimer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$721k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$920kCivil Rights$874kHealth$656kArts & Culture$600kPublic Safety & Disaster$395kPublic Benefit$277kEnvironment$270kPhilanthropy$208kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $160k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $525k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICARES$100,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$100,000
ACLU FOUNDATION$75,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$75,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES$75,000
CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS$50,000
LOS ANGELES FOOD BANK$50,000
CEDARS-SINAI$35,000
NRDC$30,000
CENTER THEATRE GROUP$30,000
LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC$15,000
KCET$10,000
PBS SOCAL$10,000
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO$10,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BEN'S LIGHTHOUSE: $1k → 9%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
CT
CA
DE
NC
DC
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.4M · 25 repeat orgs$159k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
10

Total granted

$4.4M
$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
-5%

Still filing today

84%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsArts & CultureInternationalHealthEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $459k · revenue +102%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $395k · revenue ×34
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $375k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • SOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
  • FF
    FOCUS FOR DEMOCRACY FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • AC
    ACCELERATE CHANGE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
4
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
5
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
6
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
7
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall

The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…

International
10
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Accelerate Change Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bens Lighthouse Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
19/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $575,000 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION INCWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $395,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCInternational Rescue Committee INC: $340,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee I…+1 more: $5,000 · InternationalAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $459,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UN…THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $360,000 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE…THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $200,000 · Civil RightsTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CEN…+3 more: $75,000 · Civil Rights+3 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $375,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHO…CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $220,300 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MED…Children's Hospital Los Angeles: $60,250 · HealthChildren's Hospi…CENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES: $265,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER THEAT…LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $135,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES …GEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC: $58,000 · Arts & CultureGEFFEN PLAYH…SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $50,300 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN CAL…+2 more: $3,025 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES FOOD BANK: $165,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES …WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE: $60,670 · OtherWILSHIRE BOU…KCRW: $50,000 · OtherKCRWKCET: $25,000 · OtherSOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE: $50,000 · OtherSOUTHERN VIS…UCLA FOUNDATION: $25,250 · OtherJewish Child and Family Services: $40,000 · OtherJewish Child…Northwestern University: $20,000 · Other+14 more: $83,733 · Other+14 moreNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $270,000 · EnvironmentJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $200,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · Philanthropy
International$1,315,000Civil Rights$1,094,000Health$655,550Arts & Culture$511,325Other$519,653Environment$270,000Philanthropy$201,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $575,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $459,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $395,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $375,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $360,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $340,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $270,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES: $265,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $220,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $200,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $200,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $135,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $60,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC: $58,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $50,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJewish Child and Family Services: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $25,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOCUS FOR DEMOCRACY FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACCELERATE CHANGE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC: $15,113 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTER PARTNERSHIP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRENTWOOD SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLyric Opera of Chicago: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUITY ARC: $1,025 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds GEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Child and Family Services ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOCUS FOR DEMOCRACY FUND ↗
  • Who funds ACCELERATE CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds THE BAIL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds BABY2BABY ↗
  • Who funds BRENTWOOD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Lyric Opera of Chicago ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sondheimer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sondheimer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Sondheimer Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Sondheimer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sondheimer’s filings →

More from the funding graph