Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Simsmaes Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

63% of The Simsmaes Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Massachusetts Institute Of Technology, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 31 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

35
’17
35
’18
36
’19
35
’20
37
’21
36
’22
36
’23
34
’24
31
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Philanthropy$8.2MEducation$1.8MEnvironment$133kInternational$74kArts & Culture$71kHealth$60kHousing & Shelter$25kScience & Tech$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k32 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.6M
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$34M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$1,049,960
DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC (FORMERLY SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND)$555,000
TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE (DBA TUFTS UNIVERSITY)$10,000
350 ORG$3,000
DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$3,000
COLLEGE OF THE ATLANTIC$2,000
ROSIES PLACE$2,000
NATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC$2,000
STATION MAINE$2,000
SAIL POWER AND STEAM MUSEUM$2,000
MAINE COAST HERITAGE TRUST$2,000
WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE$2,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$2,000
PATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL$2,000
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY (WBUR)$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%PINE STREET INN: $2k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $2k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $1k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $1k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $1k → 16%COMMUNITY ARTS CENTER: $1k → 8%PINE STREET INN: $1k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $1k → 16%COMMUNITY ART CENTER: $1k → 8%LA COLABORATIVA: $2k → 16%COMMUNITY ART CENTER: $500 → 8%LA COLABORATIVA: $2k → 16%COMMUNITY ARTS CENTER: $500 → 8%PINE STREET INN: $1k → 16%COMMUNITY ART CENTER: $500 → 8%LA COLABORATIVA: $2k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $1k → 16%COMMUNITY ARTS CENTER: $500 → 8%COMMUNITY ART CENTER: $500 → 8%COMMUNITY ART CENTER: $500 → 8%COMMUNITY ARTS CENTER: $500 → 8%HEALTH STORY COLLABORATIVE: $1k → 8%HEALTH STORY COLLABORATIVE: $1k → 8%HEALTH STORY COLLABORATIVE: $1k → 8%HEALTH STORY COLLABORATIVE: $500 → 8%HEALTH STORY COLLABORATIVE: $500 → 8%HEALTH STORY COLLABORATIVE: $500 → 8%HEALTH STORY COLLABORATIVE: $200 → 8%HEALTH STORY COLLABORATIVE: $200 → 8%HEALTH STORY COLLABORATIVE: $200 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NY
MA
OH
RI
CA
MD
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$772k · 56 repeat orgs$570k to everyone else

56 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
15

Total granted

$772k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+119%

Still filing today

82%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $558k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentInternationalHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SHADY HILL SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $229k · revenue +51%
  • BC
    BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +18%
  • Trustees of Tufts College
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • MD
    MAYOR'S DISASTER RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • PB
    Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue 0%
  • SC
    SIERRA CLUB
    one grant, 2017 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
3
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
6
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
7
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
8
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
9
Ceres Inc

Ceres is a nonprofit advocacy organization working to accelerate the transition to a cleaner, more just, and resilient world. through education and research, we make the business case for action on the most pressing sustainability…

Environment
10
New England Lawboston

New england law/boston dedicates itself to preparing students to be successful lawyers and leaders in the public and private sectors through integrated practical, theoretical and ethical education of the highest caliber and to contributing…

Education
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cambridge Youth Hockey. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPregnancy Support ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportCancer Support ServicesLocal Food System Organizat…Youth Sports ProgramsChristian Youth CampsHealth Access Advocacy and …Community Arts CentersDevelopmental Disabilities …Food Banks and PantriesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Environmental Conservation …Community FoundationsIndependent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 50 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr17%19%20–35yr11%28%35–55yr13%40%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr17%79%20–35yr11%2%35–55yr13%20%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/60
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,918

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
57/58
Grantees still filing
45/58
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $7,603,181 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $1,451,960 · EducationMassachusetts Insti…SHADY HILL SCHOOL — $229,000 · EducationSHADY HILL SCHOOL+13 more — $95,200 · Education+13 moreDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC (FORMERLY SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND) — $555,000 · OtherHARVARD COLLEGE — $70,000 · Other+34 more — $147,500 · Other350ORG — $23,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS — $17,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $13,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $11,000 · EnvironmentMaine Coast Heritage Trust — $10,000 · EnvironmentMaine Island Trail Association — $9,000 · EnvironmentMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $9,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $8,000 · Environment+1 more — $500 · EnvironmentMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $18,000 · InternationalPATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL — $17,000 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $16,000 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INC — $10,000 · InternationalWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE — $6,000 · InternationalPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC — $4,032 · InternationalDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $25,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $19,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $10,000 · HealthCamden Area District Nursing Association — $4,500 · Health+1 more — $1,000 · HealthPINE STREET INN INC — $11,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $8,000 · Human ServicesLA COLABORATIVA INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ART CENTER INC — $5,500 · Human ServicesHEALTH STORY COLLABORATIVE INC — $5,100 · Human Services
Philanthropy$7,603,181Education$1,776,160Other$772,500Environment$100,500International$71,032Health$59,500Human Services$35,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $7,603,181 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $1,451,960 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSHADY HILL SCHOOL — $229,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetBERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC — $31,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $25,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budget350ORG — $23,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $22,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $19,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS — $17,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL — $17,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $16,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC — $14,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC — $11,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC — $11,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC — $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMaine Coast Heritage Trust — $10,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC — $9,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOMERVILLE-CAMBRIDGE ELDER SERVICES INCORPORATED — $9,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMaine Island Trail Association — $9,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOberlin College — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE ATLANTIC — $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC — $7,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLA COLABORATIVA INC — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ART CENTER INC — $5,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTH STORY COLLABORATIVE INC — $5,100 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetGAINING GROUND INC — $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCamden Area District Nursing Association — $4,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC — $4,032 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRVOTE — $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEW SCHOOL OF MUSIC INC — $3,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL OF WESTON INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIsland Institute — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZEN SCHOOLS INC — $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMOZILLA FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMBRIDGE CAMPING ASSOCIATION INC — $2,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNoticeAbility Inc — $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCambridge Youth Hockey — $1,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds SHADY HILL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds 350ORG ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ↗
  • Who funds PATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Maine Coast Heritage Trust ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOMERVILLE-CAMBRIDGE ELDER SERVICES INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Maine Island Trail Association ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Oberlin College ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF THE ATLANTIC ↗
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC ↗
  • Who funds LA COLABORATIVA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ART CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH STORY COLLABORATIVE INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncEastern Bank Foundati…Cambridge Community F…Cambridge Savings Cha…Eastern Cambridge Fou…The Bank of America C…The Pfizer Foundation…Renaissance Charitabl…Vanguard Charitable E…The Blackbaud Giving …American Online Givin…Morgan Stanley Global…
Boston Foundation IncMA20.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Cambridge Community Foundation · Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Eastern Cambridge Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Simsmaes Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
  • La Colaborativa Inc — 34% of income from government
  • Cambridge Camping Association Inc — 14% of income from government
  • Community Art Center Inc — 14% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Citizen Schools Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Gaining Ground Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Food for Free Committee Inc — 3% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
  • New England Conservatory of Music — 1% of income from government
  • The Institute of Contemporary Art Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Berklee College of Music Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines