How much does The Siegel Family Charitable Foundation give?

The Siegel Family Charitable Foundation reported 1 grants totaling $776 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 32 and 77 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.

What does The Siegel Family Charitable Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2024, its largest causes are Religion (42%), Philanthropy (37%), Education (9%).

Who are The Siegel Family Charitable Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2020 to FY2024: Teachers On Fire ($112k), Westchester Day School ($55k), Mesivta Yeshiva Rabbi Chaim Berlin ($40k).

Does The Siegel Family Charitable Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 19% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does The Siegel Family Charitable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as The Siegel Family Charitable Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles, Jewish Communal Fund, The Ojc Fund.

Where is The Siegel Family Charitable Foundation based?

The Siegel Family Charitable Foundation is based in VA.

The Siegel Family Charitable Foundation

The Siegel Family Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Siegel Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$776

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$776

Largest

01What it funds

0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$611kPhilanthropy$539kEducation$132kHuman Services$13kInternational$11kHealth$11kYouth Development$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kOther$0

02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$776

Median grant

States reached

$5k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
ADAS TORAH	$776

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$738k · 51 repeat orgs$714k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

51 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 50 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$738k

$714k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%

+18%

Still filing today

31%

24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

ReligionHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyInternationalHealthOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BJ
BETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL OF DENVER
3× · 2020–2022 · $36k · revenue +25%
YO
YESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC
4× · 2020–2023 · $17k · revenue +21%
WC
West Coast Vaad Hachesed
4× · 2020–2023 · $12k · revenue +93%

Funded once

BO
BANK OF AMERICA CHARTABLE GIFT FUND
one grant, 2023 · $536k
TO
TORAH ORE SEMINARY INCE
one grant, 2022 · $19k
IG
Individual grant recipient
one grant, 2022 · $17k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel

Philanthropy

Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—

Zichron Avrohom Yosef

Philanthropy

Sherit Isroel

—

Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation

Philanthropy

Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion

Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion

Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion

Ahavas Torah V'chesed

Philanthropy

Ziv Israel Association

—

Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc

Philanthropy

Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc

Philanthropy

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Camp Hachshara-Moshava of Ny Inc; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 135 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

37/38

Grantees still filing

27/38

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$1,268,626Religion$88,235Education$67,920Health$8,580International$7,956Human Services$7,132Philanthropy$6,520

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA44.2× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Goldner Family Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Chavi F Hertz Foundation Inc · The Dennis Berman Family Foundation Inc · The Elishis Family Foundation · Mayberg Foundation Inc · The Jewish Federation of Greater Washington Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jay Morris Foundation Inc

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Siegel Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Siegel Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

5get no government money at all

4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Siegel Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home