Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sid Pashelinsky Foundation Inc Co Ryan Ratner Esq

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$240k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Animals$554kHealth$474kHuman Services$237kPhilanthropy$79kYouth Development$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $230k
$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL TAY-SACHS ALLIED DISEASES$30,000
JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$25,000
DEZZYS SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE$25,000
BARKVILLE DOG RESCUE$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
EASTERSEALS$20,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF BROWARD C$20,000
HIGH 5 BASKTEBALL$15,000
SWEET DREAM MAKERS$15,000
DANNY RONS RESCUE$10,000
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION$10,000
100 ABANDONED DOGS OF EVERGLADES$10,000
HOPE CENTER FOR AUTISM$5,000
POLKA DOGZ PET RESCUE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION: $88k → 11%NATIONAL TAY-SACHS ALLIED DISEASES: $52k → 7%DANNY RONS RESCUE: $88k → 11%GOOD KARMA PET RESCUE: $17k → 13%NICKLAUS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $55k → 15%ADVENTURE FOR AVA: $25k → 22%EASTERSEALS: $20k → 14%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION: $41k → 11%NATIONAL TAY-SACHS ALLIED DISEASES: $33k → 7%DANNY RONS RESCUE: $19k → 11%GOOD KARMA PET RESCUE: $12k → 13%NICKLAUS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $34k → 15%ADVENTURE FOR AVA: $25k → 22%EASTERSEALS: $20k → 14%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%NATIONAL TAY-SACHS ALLIED DISEASES: $30k → 7%DANNY RONS RESCUE: $17k → 11%100 ABANDONED DOGS OF EVERGLADES: $52k → 13%NICKLAUS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $30k → 15%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%NATIONAL TAY-SACHS ALLIED DISEASES: $30k → 7%DANNY RONS RESCUE: $10k → 11%100 ABANDONED DOGS OF EVERGLADES: $19k → 13%NATIONAL TAY-SACHS ALLIED DISEASES: $22k → 7%DANNY RONS RESCUE: $10k → 11%100 ABANDONED DOGS OF EVERGLADES: $10k → 13%DANNY RONS RESCUE: $8k → 11%DDS SENIOR SANCTUARY: $35k → 13%DEZZYS SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE: $25k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF BROWARD C: $20k → 13%DEZZYS SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE: $25k → 11%DDS SENIOR SANCTUARY: $12k → 13%DEZZYS SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE: $19k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF BROWARD C: $20k → 13%DEZZYS SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE: $17k → 11%JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $50k → 13%DEZZYS SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE: $17k → 11%JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $50k → 13%HIGH 5 BASKTEBALL: $15k → 11%JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $25k → 13%SWEET DREAM MAKERS: $22k → 11%JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $25k → 13%SWEET DREAM MAKERS: $19k → 11%JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $17k → 13%SWEET DREAM MAKERS: $15k → 11%JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $17k → 13%SWEET DREAM MAKERS: $15k → 11%SWEET DREAM MAKERS: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 14 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
3

Total granted

$1.4M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
+248%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JD
    JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $183k · revenue -46%
  • NT
    NATIONAL TAY-SACHS ALLIED DISEASES
    5× · 2020–2025 · $168k
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $157k

Funded once

  • HB
    HIGH-5 BASKETBALL INC
    one grant, 2025 · $15k
  • TH
    THE HOPE CENTER FOR AUTISM INC
    one grant, 2025 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • PD
    POLKA DOGZ PET RESCUE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $5k · revenue +248%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Barking Mad Animal Rescue

Rescue abused & abandoned dogs, urgent at risk of euthanasia dogs, medical needs & hospice dogs to provide veterinary care, rehabilitation, and find homes for dogs that become adoptable. Sanctuary til end of life is provided for those not…

Animals
2
Pawlicious Poochie Pet Rescue Inc

Rescuing old hospice critically injured and handicap small dogs fro kill shelters and owner surrenders. Spays neuters medications orthopedic surgeries dental surgeries vaccines cardio care echocardiograms heartworm prevention and treatment…

Animals
3
St Clouds Rescue
Animals
4
Happy Tails Dog Rescue Inc

The Organization's mission is to rescue dogs from high-kill animal shelters and place them in loving forever homes. All dogs rescued are given necessary medical care prior to adoption, including required vaccinations. Dogs are placed in…

Animals
5
Angels for Sara Sanctuary

Rescue senior dogs from shelters; people who go into nursing homes; people who have passed.We get their medical needs taken care of; then we will try to find them their forever homes. We work with seniors who are needing a companion and…

Animals
6
Pet Rescue Miami Inc
Animals
7
Donna's Love Pet Rescue
Animals
8
Broken Souls Rescue & Recovery Inc

We rescue abused and neglected dogs. we rehabilitate our dogs at our rescue sanctuary to prepare them to live a happy, healthy life in their new furever home

Animals
9
One Starfish Rehoming Connections Inc

Rehoming and sanctuary for dogs in need.

Animals
10
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
11
Saved By Fate Inc

Dog rescue

Animals
12
Dollys Legacy Animal Rescue

Foster-based animal rescue that rescues homeless and abandoned animals, providing them with veterinary care including specialized care, heartworm treatment, surgery, severe illness treatment & hospitalization, then placing them for…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dds Senior Sanctuary Inc; the most unlike its peers is Easter Seals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL TAY-SACHS ALLIED DISEASES: $167,583 · OtherNATIONAL TAY-SACHS ALLIED DISEASESMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION: $157,294 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATIONDANNY RONS RESCUE: $151,700 · OtherDANNY RONS RESCUENICKLAUS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $118,185 · OtherNICKLAUS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL100 ABANDONED DOGS OF EVERGLADES: $80,613 · Other100 ABANDONED DOGS OF EVERGLADESIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF BROWARD C: $40,000 · OtherEASTER SEALS INC: $40,000 · Other+1 more: $15,000 · OtherBARKVILLE DOG RESCUE INC: $138,000 · AnimalsBARKVILLE DOG RESCUE INCDEZZYS SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $102,000 · AnimalsDEZZYS SECOND CHANCE ANIM…DDS SENIOR SANCTUARY INC: $47,850 · AnimalsDDS SENIOR SANCTUARY INCGood Karma Pet Rescue Inc: $29,237 · AnimalsGood Karma Pet Rescue Inc+1 more: $5,000 · AnimalsJOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $182,929 · HealthJOE DIMAGGIO C…Sweet Dream Makers Inc: $79,295 · PhilanthropyTHE HOPE CENTER FOR AUTISM INC: $5,000 · Education
Other$820,375Animals$322,087Health$182,929Philanthropy$79,295Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $182,929 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBARKVILLE DOG RESCUE INC: $138,000 over 6y, 6.2% of budgetDEZZYS SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $102,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetSweet Dream Makers Inc: $79,295 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetDDS SENIOR SANCTUARY INC: $47,850 over 2y, 47% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGood Karma Pet Rescue Inc: $29,237 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetTHE HOPE CENTER FOR AUTISM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BARKVILLE DOG RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds DEZZYS SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Sweet Dream Makers Inc ↗
  • Who funds DDS SENIOR SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds Good Karma Pet Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE HOPE CENTER FOR AUTISM INC ↗
  • Who funds POLKA DOGZ PET RESCUE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC10.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sid Pashelinsky Foundation Inc Co Ryan Ratner Esq funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sid Pashelinsky Foundation Inc Co Ryan Ratner Esq. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Hope Center for Autism Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sid Pashelinsky Foundation Inc Co Ryan Ratner Esq’s filings →

More from the funding graph