· Private foundation
The Sid Pashelinsky Foundation Inc Co Ryan Ratner Esq
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $230k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL TAY-SACHS ALLIED DISEASES | $30,000 |
| JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDRENS HOSPITAL | $25,000 |
| DEZZYS SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE | $25,000 |
| BARKVILLE DOG RESCUE | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| EASTERSEALS | $20,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF BROWARD C | $20,000 |
| HIGH 5 BASKTEBALL | $15,000 |
| SWEET DREAM MAKERS | $15,000 |
| DANNY RONS RESCUE | $10,000 |
| 100 ABANDONED DOGS OF EVERGLADES | $10,000 |
| MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| POLKA DOGZ PET RESCUE | $5,000 |
| HOPE CENTER FOR AUTISM | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JDJOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC6× · 2020–2025 · $183k · revenue -46%
- NTNATIONAL TAY-SACHS ALLIED DISEASES5× · 2020–2025 · $168k
- MFMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2025 · $157k
Funded once
- HBHIGH-5 BASKETBALL INCone grant, 2025 · $15k
- PDPOLKA DOGZ PET RESCUE INCgraduatedone grant, 2025 · $5k · revenue +248%
- THTHE HOPE CENTER FOR AUTISM INCone grant, 2025 · $5k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rescue abused & abandoned dogs, urgent at risk of euthanasia dogs, medical needs & hospice dogs to provide veterinary care, rehabilitation, and find homes for dogs that become adoptable. Sanctuary til end of life is provided for those not…
Rescuing old hospice critically injured and handicap small dogs fro kill shelters and owner surrenders. Spays neuters medications orthopedic surgeries dental surgeries vaccines cardio care echocardiograms heartworm prevention and treatment…
The Organization's mission is to rescue dogs from high-kill animal shelters and place them in loving forever homes. All dogs rescued are given necessary medical care prior to adoption, including required vaccinations. Dogs are placed in…
Rescue senior dogs from shelters; people who go into nursing homes; people who have passed.We get their medical needs taken care of; then we will try to find them their forever homes. We work with seniors who are needing a companion and…
We rescue abused and neglected dogs. we rehabilitate our dogs at our rescue sanctuary to prepare them to live a happy, healthy life in their new furever home
Rehoming and sanctuary for dogs in need.
Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,
Dog rescue
Foster-based animal rescue that rescues homeless and abandoned animals, providing them with veterinary care including specialized care, heartworm treatment, surgery, severe illness treatment & hospitalization, then placing them for…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dds Senior Sanctuary Inc and the most unlike its peers is Easter Seals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BARKVILLE DOG RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds DEZZYS SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds Sweet Dream Makers Inc ↗
- Who funds DDS SENIOR SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS INC ↗
- Who funds Good Karma Pet Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds POLKA DOGZ PET RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOPE CENTER FOR AUTISM INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Sid Pashelinsky Foundation Inc Co Ryan Ratner Esq funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Hope Center for Autism Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.