Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Shoemaker Family Charitable Trust Ua Dtd 12 12 2012

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$55k
Granted FY2022
8
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Animals$25kArts & Culture$15kHealth$15kHuman Services$10kFood & Nutrition$5k
02FY2022 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$5,201
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$10,000
BELLE GROVE INC$10,000
THE LAUREL CENTER$10,000
WINCHESTER AREA SPCA$5,201
BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE$5,000
WILDLIFE VETERINARY CARE$5,000
STONE HOUSE FOUNDATION$5,000
BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bella View Farm Animal Sanctuary Inc
Animals
2
Brookhaven Animal Rescue Alliance Ltd

animal rescue and spay and nueter of feral cats. house and care for animals in need

Animals
3
Wild Souls Wildlife Rescue and Rehabilitation
Animals
4
Blue Lion Rescue

Rescue and sanctuary for dogs

Animals
5
Forever Wild Wildlife Rescue
Animals
6
2nd Chance Ranch and Rescue

Sanctuary for abused or abandoned animals

Animals
7
Hearthfire Animal Rescue Team
Animals
8
Rockys Refuge

Rescue and rehabilitation of abused/neglected animals.

Animals
9
Bristow Barnyard Farm and Domestic Animal Rescue
Animals
10
Grace Farm Animal Rescue and Sanctu
Animals
11
Bessies Creek Farm Animal Sanctuary & Rescue

Bessies Creek Farm Animal Sanctuary & Rescue is a non profit animal rescue and sanctuary.

—
12
Middle Ridge Animal Rescue Inc
Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blue Ridge Hospice Inc; the most unlike its peers is Stone House Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10,000 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECTWINCHESTER AREA SPCA: $5,201 · OtherWINCHESTER AREA SPCABLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 · OtherBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INCDAKOTA'S DREAM ANIMAL RESCUEINC: $7,500 · AnimalsDAKOTA'S DREAM ANIMAL RESCUEINCThe Community Cat Alliance: $7,500 · AnimalsThe Community Cat AllianceWILDLIFE VETERINARY CARE: $5,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE VETERINARY CARETHE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE LAUREL CENTER INTERV…BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesBLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INCBELLE GROVE INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureBELLE GROVE INCSTONE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Arts & CultureSTONE HOUSE FOUNDATION
Other$20,201Animals$20,000Human Services$15,000Arts & Culture$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBELLE GROVE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetThe Community Cat Alliance: $7,500 over 1y, 10.0% of budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTONE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetBLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE VETERINARY CARE: $5,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

James L and Mary Jane Bowman Charitable TrustVA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: James L and Mary Jane Bowman Charitable Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Shoemaker Family Charitable Trust Ua Dtd 12 12 2012 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Shoemaker Family Charitable Trust Ua Dtd 12 12 2012. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Shoemaker Family Charitable Trust Ua Dtd 12 12 2012?

    Find your warmest path to The Shoemaker Family Charitable Trust Ua Dtd 12 12 2012 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Shoemaker Family Charitable Trust Ua Dtd 12 12 2012’s filings →

    More from the funding graph