Skip to content
The Shine Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Shine Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$258k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$2.8MHousing & Shelter$2.0MHuman Services$1.4MHealth$1.3MEnvironment$505kCivil Rights$478kArts & Culture$449kEducation$400kOther$0
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $556k
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $1.8M
  • $250k+1 grant · $258k
$40,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE$258,000
ICCF COMMUNITY HOMES$200,000
AYA YOUTH COLLECTIVE$200,000
NEW CITY NEIGHBORS$190,000
JUBILEE MINISTRIES INC$160,000
NEW CITY KIDS$150,000
ESCAPE MINISTRIES$111,500
LATIN AMERICANS UNITED FOR PROGRESS INC$105,000
DANA-FABER CANCER INSTITUTE$101,000
MICHIGAN IMMIGRANT RIGHTS CENTER$100,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY KENT COUNTY$100,000
GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES$100,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FUND OF MICHIGAN$75,000
MOMENTUM CENTER$50,000
LIGHTHOUSE IMMIGRANT ADVOCATES$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 48% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%TREETOPS COLLECTIVE: $130k → 11%BENJAMIN'S HOPE: $50k → 8%JUBILEE MINISTRIES INC: $160k → 10%BENJAMIN'S HOPE: $50k → 8%TREETOPS COLLECTIVE: $40k → 11%BENJAMIN'S HOPE: $50k → 8%GRAND RAPIDS NEIHIEMIAH PROJECT: $40k → 11%TREETOPS COLLECTIVE: $33k → 11%GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $100k → 10%GRAND RAPIDS NEIHIEMIAH PROJECT: $30k → 11%GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $80k → 10%GRAND RAPIDS NEIHIEMIAH PROJECT: $30k → 11%GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $80k → 10%TREETOPS COLLECTIVE: $30k → 11%GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $60k → 10%GRAND RAPIDS NEIHIEMIAH PROJECT: $30k → 11%EVERGREEN COMMONS: $50k → 10%BETTER WISER STRONGER INC: $20k → 11%TREETOPS COLLECTIVE: $15k → 11%LIGHTHOUSE IMMIGRANT ADVOCATES: $50k → 10%LIGHTHOUSE IMMIGRANT ADVOCATES: $46k → 10%LIGHTHOUSE IMMIGRANT ADVOCATES: $40k → 10%LIGHTHOUSE IMMIGRANT ADVOCATES: $40k → 10%SAMARITAS: $8k → 11%BAXTER COMMUNITY CENTER: $40k → 11%BAXTER COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 11%BAXTER COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 11%LIGHTHOUSE IMMIGRANT ADVOCATES: $25k → 10%STOREHOUSE OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $75k → 11%GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $25k → 10%BAXTER COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 11%THE STOREHOUSE: $50k → 11%BAXTER COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 11%CAMP SUNSHINE: $11k → 10%STOREHOUSE OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $50k → 11%BAXTER COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 11%THE STOREHOUSE: $50k → 11%BAXTER COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 11%THE STOREHOUSE: $16k → 11%OTHER WAY MINISTRIES: $35k → 11%OTHER WAY MINISTRIES: $20k → 11%UPCYCLE BIKES: $4k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
MD
SC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.8M · 50 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

50 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
38

Total granted

$8.8M
$760k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+28%

Still filing today

88%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $929k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ON
    ODC NETWORK
    2× · 2021–2022 · $500k · revenue +109%
  • GR
    GRAND RAPIDS YOUTH COMMONWEALTH INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $475k · revenue +4%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE
    5× · 2020–2025 · $458k · revenue +177%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INDIAN RIVER
    one grant, 2019 · $300k
  • WH
    WELL HOUSE
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • GL
    GODFREY LEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2020 · $75k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Great Lakes Community Action Partnership

The mission of great lakes community action partnership is to create partnerships and opportunites to help individuals, families and communities thrive.

Human Services
2
Lakeshore Legal Aid

Standing with our neighbors, Lakeshore Legal Aid fights poverty and injustice through advocacy and by providing meaningful and dignified access to the legal system.

Crime & Legal
3
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
4
Mid Michigan Community Action Agency Inc

Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.

—
5
African Resource Center of West Michigan

The African Resource Center informs connects and equips African immigrants in West Michigan with people and resources to foster a flourishing community in which recent African immigrants can prosper emotionally economically and socially.

Human Services
6
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
7
Residential Opportunities Inc

We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.

Human Services
8
The Right Place Inc

The right place is the economic development organization that drives current and long-term economic prosperity in west michigan.

—
9
Connections for Life

Empowering people with disabilities by providing services that promote independence, equality and intergration, enhancing their quality of life.

Health
10
Brilliant Detroit

Helping families and neighborhoods succeed by providing a place and support to assure kids ages 0-5 are school ready and families are healthy and stable.

Youth Development
11
Local Circles

Local circles offers young detroiters an employment opportunity in youth- led research. by employing youth to do research, local circles intervenes on two simultaneous social issues facing young detroiters today: youth unemployment and…

—
12
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grand Rapids Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Better Wiser Stronger Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

85 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 85 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
26
Early backer (in before they grew)
83/85
Grantees still filing
51/85
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRAND RAPIDS YOUTH COMMONWEALTH INC: $475,000 · OtherGRAND RAPIDS YOUTH COMMONWEALTH INCCOMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE: $458,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION HOUSEBOYS & GIRLS CLUB INDIAN RIVER: $300,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB INDIAN RIVERLATIN AMERICANS UNITED FOR PROGRESS INC: $292,500 · OtherLATIN AMERICANS UNITED FOR PROGRESS INCWomen's Resource Center: $285,000 · OtherWomen's Resource CenterAFFINITY MENTORING: $140,000 · OtherWEST MICHIGAN CENTER FOR ARTS & TECHNOLOGY: $215,000 · OtherWEST MICHIGAN CENTER FOR ARTS & TECHNOLOG…+58 more: $1,742,896 · Other+58 moreGOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $345,000 · Human ServicesGOOD SAMARITAN MINI…Treetops Collective: $247,943 · Human ServicesTreetops CollectiveSTOREHOUSE OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $241,000 · Human ServicesSTOREHOUSE OF COMMU…LIGHTHOUSE IMMIGRANT ADVOCATES: $201,000 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUSE IMMIGRAN…JUBILEE MINISTRIES INC: $160,000 · Human ServicesJUBILEE MINISTRIES …BENJAMIN'S HOPE: $150,000 · Human ServicesBENJAMIN'S HOPEBAXTER COMMUNITY CENTER: $135,000 · Human ServicesBAXTER COMMUNITY CE…GRAND RAPIDS NEHEMIAH PROJECT: $130,000 · Human ServicesGRAND RAPIDS NEHEMI…+8 more: $169,300 · Human Services+8 moreBranch Interfaith Hospitality Network: $880,000 · Housing & ShelterBranch Interfaith …AYA YOUTH COLLECTIVE: $400,000 · Housing & ShelterAYA YOUTH COLLECTI…ICCF COMMUNITY HOMES: $200,000 · Housing & ShelterICCF COMMUNITY HOM…FAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDS: $185,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE OF …+1 more: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterNEW CITY KIDS INC: $385,000 · Youth DevelopmentNEW CITY KID…NEW CITY NEIGHBORS: $270,000 · Youth DevelopmentNEW CITY NEI…Escape YFGK: $241,500 · Youth DevelopmentEscape YFGKI AM ACADEMY: $146,500 · Youth DevelopmentI AM ACADEMYNO SURRENDER RUNNING CLUB INC: $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentNO SURRENDER…+1 more: $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentThe Livestrong Foundation: $699,949 · PhilanthropyThe Livest…CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $120,630 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S…GRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropyGRAND RAPI…+2 more: $25,300 · PhilanthropyBridge Street House of Prayer: $447,000 · ReligionGRAND RAPIDS INITIATIVE FOR LEADERS: $63,908 · ReligionEXTENDED GRACE: $50,000 · ReligionGENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER: $22,500 · ReligionODC NETWORK: $500,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $25,000 · Animals+3 more: $6,200 · Animals
Other$3,908,396Human Services$1,779,243Housing & Shelter$1,680,000Youth Development$1,121,500Philanthropy$945,879Religion$583,408Animals$531,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Livestrong Foundation: $699,949 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetODC NETWORK: $500,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS YOUTH COMMONWEALTH INC: $475,000 over 4y, 9.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE: $458,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetBridge Street House of Prayer: $447,000 over 5y, 32% of budgetAYA YOUTH COLLECTIVE: $400,000 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetNEW CITY KIDS INC: $385,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $345,000 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetLATIN AMERICANS UNITED FOR PROGRESS INC: $292,500 over 4y, 8.7% of budgetWomen's Resource Center: $285,000 over 5y, 6.5% of budgetNEW CITY NEIGHBORS: $270,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetTreetops Collective: $247,943 over 5y, 10% of budgetEscape YFGK: $241,500 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetSTOREHOUSE OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $241,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetWEST MICHIGAN CENTER FOR ARTS & TECHNOLOGY: $215,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE IMMIGRANT ADVOCATES: $201,000 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDS: $185,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetJUBILEE MINISTRIES INC: $160,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetBENJAMIN'S HOPE: $150,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetI AM ACADEMY: $146,500 over 5y, 17% of budgetAFFINITY MENTORING: $140,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetBAXTER COMMUNITY CENTER: $135,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS NEHEMIAH PROJECT: $130,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetGrandville Avenue Arts and Humanities Inc: $127,500 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetEarly Learning Neighborhood Collaborative: $125,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $120,630 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetLAKESHORE NONPROFIT ALLIANCE: $112,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWELL HOUSE: $100,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KENT COUNTY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetNO SURRENDER RUNNING CLUB INC: $75,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS INITIATIVE FOR LEADERS: $63,908 over 2y, 13% of budgetCULTUREWORKS: $56,300 over 2y, 10% of budgetTHE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES: $55,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetEVERGREEN COMMONS: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEXTENDED GRACE: $50,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetMOSAIC COUNSELING: $45,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetDA BLODGETT - ST JOHN'S: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPOSITIVE IMPACT FOR LIFE: $30,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetFIRST DESCENTS: $26,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHAND2HAND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHealthTree Foundation Inc: $24,647 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $23,667 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER: $22,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetChildren's HopeChest: $20,760 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Rapids Communit…Frey FoundationThe Community Foundat…Heart of West Michiga…Larry and Karen Mulde…Douglas & Maria Devos…Cdv5 FoundationSteelcase FoundationCorewell Health Group…The Wege FoundationWK Kellogg FoundationThe Mercantile Bank F…
Grand Rapids Community FoundationMI73.5× affinity36 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Frey Foundation · The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Heart of West Michigan United Way · Larry and Karen Mulder Foundation · Douglas & Maria Devos Foundation · Cdv5 Foundation · Steelcase Foundation · Corewell Health Group Return · The Wege Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · The Mercantile Bank Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Shine Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Shine Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals: 67% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Shine Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Shine Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 106 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shine’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home