Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Shaver Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$125kEducation$103kHealth$62kReligion$38kPhilanthropy$33kHuman Services$22kFood & Nutrition$15kHousing & Shelter$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIG FISH FOUNDATION$30,000
TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION$15,000
CHRIST THE KING CATHOLIC CHURCH$8,000
VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY$2,500
EAGLES AUTISM FOUNDATION$2,500
ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL SCHO$2,500
ASSOCATION OF FORMER STUDENTS (A&M)$2,500
FRASSATI CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$2,047
NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOC$1,750
SAINT LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL$1,000
NEW ENGLAND LIFE FLIGHT$1,000
STAR OF HOPE MISSION$1,000
MERCY HOME FOR BOYS & GIRLS$1,000
SIGHT SAVERS$1,000
NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOYS TOWN: $1k → 12%SHOES THAT FIT: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%VFW NATIONAL HOME: $1k → 9%BOYS TOWN: $500 → 12%Shoes That Fit: $1k → 14%VFW NATIONAL HOME: $500 → 9%SHOES THAT FIT: $1k → 14%VFW NATIONAL HOME: $500 → 9%VFW NATIONAL HOME: $500 → 9%HELPUSADOPTORG: $250 → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $3k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 17%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $500 → 16%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$413k · 61 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

61 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 43 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

61
34

Total granted

$413k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+19%

Still filing today

54%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentAnimalsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    Ducks Unlimited Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $124k · revenue +99%
  • BF
    BIG FISH FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $41k · revenue +50%
  • TA
    THE AGNES IRWIN SCHOOL
    5× · 2018–2024 · $23k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • 1C
    12TH CAN
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • BC
    BUILD Command Team
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • PF
    PATTON FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue -22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
5
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
6
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
9
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
10
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
11
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Abs Charitable Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 100 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
54/54
Grantees still filing
41/54
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST THOMAS VILLANOVA FUND: $23,372 · OtherST THOMAS VILLANOVA FUNDCHRIST THE KING CATHOLIC CHURCH: $17,250 · OtherCHRIST THE KING CATHOLIC CHURCHVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS (VFW): $7,250 · OtherMERCY HOME FOR BOYS & GIRLS: $6,100 · OtherALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL HOME: $5,500 · OtherST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL: $5,500 · OtherSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $6,000 · Other+59 more: $87,370 · Other+59 moreDucks Unlimited Inc: $124,000 · EnvironmentDucks Unlimited Inc+2 more: $625 · EnvironmentTHE AGNES IRWIN SCHOOL: $22,500 · EducationTHE AGNES IRWIN SCHO…Texas A&M Foundation: $22,000 · EducationTexas A&M FoundationTHE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $10,568 · EducationTHE ASSOCIATION OF F…NORTH HOUSTON CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $10,047 · EducationNORTH HOUSTON CATHOL…VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $7,000 · EducationVILLANOVA UNIVERSITYWilliam Marsh Rice University: $6,100 · EducationWilliam Marsh Rice U…BUILD Command Team: $5,000 · EducationBUILD Command Team+3 more: $417 · EducationBIG FISH FOUNDATION: $40,500 · HealthBIG FISH FOUNDA…NEW ENGLAND LIFE FLIGHT INC: $5,000 · HealthNEW ENGLAND LIF…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,750 · HealthST JUDE CHILDRE…SIGHTSAVERS INC: $3,994 · HealthSIGHTSAVERS INCSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $3,500 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPIT…EAGLES AUTISM CHALLENGE INC: $2,500 · Health+3 more: $910 · HealthCOVENANT HOUSE: $6,000 · Human ServicesSHOES THAT FIT: $3,000 · Human ServicesVFW NATIONAL HOME: $2,500 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $1,500 · Human ServicesOpen Door Mission: $1,000 · Human Services+2 more: $500 · Human ServicesWORLD VISION INC: $5,000 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $2,500 · InternationalCANINES FOR DISABLED KIDS INC: $4,000 · AnimalsCitizens For Animal Protection Inc: $2,000 · AnimalsHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $250 · Animals
Other$158,342Environment$124,625Education$83,632Health$61,154Human Services$14,500International$7,500Animals$6,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $124,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBIG FISH FOUNDATION: $40,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTHE AGNES IRWIN SCHOOL: $22,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $22,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $10,568 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH HOUSTON CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $10,047 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University: $6,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $6,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND LIFE FLIGHT INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $5,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBUILD Command Team: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $4,150 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCANINES FOR DISABLED KIDS INC: $4,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSIGHTSAVERS INC: $3,994 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPATTON FOUNDATION INC: $3,270 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetSHOES THAT FIT: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPhilabundance: $2,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF FORT WORTH INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVFW NATIONAL HOME: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLES AUTISM CHALLENGE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCitizens For Animal Protection Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION IN: $1,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA MOUNTAIN FOOD BANK INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOpen Door Mission: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET ATHENEUM INC: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS CHAPTER PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PHILADELPHIA COMMITTEE OF THE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe Christopher Barkley Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ABS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 83% of budgetCENTER POINT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $350 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNANTUCKET CENTER FOR ELDER AFFAIRS INC: $350 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetVOLUNTEER MEDICAL SERV CORPS OF LM & NAR: $310 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACADEMY AT ST JOAN OF ARC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPUSADOPTORG INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET SHELLFISH ASSOCIATION INC: $175 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON COALITION FOR LIFE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds BIG FISH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE AGNES IRWIN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NORTH HOUSTON CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds William Marsh Rice University ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND LIFE FLIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds BUILD Command Team ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CANINES FOR DISABLED KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SIGHTSAVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds PATTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHOES THAT FIT ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF FORT WORTH INC ↗
  • Who funds VFW NATIONAL HOME ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX15.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Ernst & Elfriede Frank Foundation Inc · Marek Family Foundation · Strake Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · United Way Worldwide

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Shaver Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Shaver Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association in: 9% of income from government
  • New England Life Flight Inc: 5% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Nantucket Historical Association: 1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Shaver Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Shaver Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 100 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shaver Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph