Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Shapiro Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Youth Development$23kReligion$18kCrime & Legal$18kHuman Services$18kInternational$5kFood & Nutrition$3kAnimals$2k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,116
Median grant
1
States reached
$108k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,116
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Epsicopal Community Services: $3k → 11%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 11%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$65k · 10 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$65k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+195%

Still filing today

50%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentFood & NutritionInternationalAnimalsReligionHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    The Coalition for Kids Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $13k · revenue +289%
  • IC
    InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA
    3× · 2018–2020 · $11k · revenue +4%
  • Compassion International Incorporated
    3× · 2017–2019 · $5k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • FO
    Friends of Children United Societygraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue +214%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF JOHNSON CITY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Choices Coordinated Care Solutions Inc

To strengthen youth and families while enhancing systems and communities.

Human Services
2
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
3
Cincinnati Union Bethel

Empowering women to break the cycles of poverty, addiction, and human trafficking.

Human Services
4
Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc

The Children's Home Society of North Carolina's mission is to promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.

Human Services
5
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
6
UrbanPromise Charlotte

Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.

Youth Development
7
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
8
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

9
Children in Conflict Inc

Vision: a world where no child's life is torn apart by war.children in conflict works tirelessly to restore hope, safety and childhoods to children whose lives are affected by war.

Human Services
10
She Is Safe Inc

She Is Safe prevents, rescues and restores women and girls from abuse and exploitation in high risk communities across the globe, equipping them to build lives of freedom and faith for a strong future. We accomplish our work in partnership…

International
11
Family Crisis Services Inc

Family Crisis Service, Inc. is dedicated to promoting safety and justice for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault through advcacy, support, and education.

12
Children At Risk

Children At Risk (C@R) is a statewide nonprofit organization whose mission is to serve as a catalyst for change to improve the quality of life for children through strategic research, public policy analysis, education, collaboration, and…

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Rise Up Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Assylum Seekers New York — $11,100 · OtherAssylum Seekers New YorkIndividual grant recipient — $8,654 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFriends of Children United Society — $8,300 · OtherFriends of Children United SocietyCHRIST CHURCH DAY SCHOOL — $7,960 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH DAY SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient — $5,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFAMILY PROMISE OF JOHNSON CITY — $5,000 · OtherFAMILY PROMISE OF JOHNSON CITYURBAN JUSTICE CENTER — $2,089 · Other+1 more — $250 · OtherThe Coalition for Kids Inc — $12,965 · Youth DevelopmentThe Coalition for …RISE UP INC — $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentRISE UP INCGIRLS INC — $500 · Youth DevelopmentInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA — $10,500 · ReligionInterVarsity …Compassion International Incorporated — $4,940 · InternationalEpiscopal Community Services — $4,500 · Human ServicesGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $1,593 · Food & NutritionJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK — $750 · Food & NutritionAPPALACHIAN HIGHLANDS HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $1,561 · Animals
Other$48,603Youth Development$14,465Religion$10,500International$4,940Human Services$4,500Food & Nutrition$2,343Animals$1,561

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Coalition for Kids Inc — $12,965 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA — $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Children United Society — $8,300 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated — $4,940 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEpiscopal Community Services — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN JUSTICE CENTER — $2,089 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $1,593 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN HIGHLANDS HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $1,561 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRISE UP INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Shapiro Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Shapiro Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Shapiro Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph