Skip to content
The Seligman Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Seligman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$195k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.4MArts & Culture$1.2MReligion$1.2MInternational$563kEducation$437kHuman Services$267kHealth$200kCivil Rights$44kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $161k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE WOLFSONIAN - FIU$30,000
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE$25,000
CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF MILL VALLEY$22,500
JEWISH FEDERATION OF METRO DETROIT$20,000
BARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE$19,495
CHABAD OF NOVI$12,500
UNITED HATZALAH OF ISRAEL$12,000
MUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN$10,000
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$10,000
CABARET 313$5,000
INDEPENDENT WOMEN'S FORUM$5,000
MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$5,000
UCLA FOUNDATION$3,500
USC SHOAH FOUNDATION$3,500
WASSERMAN PROJECT FUND$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $269k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 11%BAY AREA FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $10k → 8%BAY AREA FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $4k → 8%BAY AREA FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $4k → 8%BAY AREA FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $3k → 8%INSTITUTE ON AGING: $5k → 10%BAY AREA FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $3k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $5k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $30k → 8%BAY AREA FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $3k → 8%INSTITUTE ON AGING: $5k → 10%INSTITUTE ON AGING: $5k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $5k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $1k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $5k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF METRO DETROIT: $100 → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $5k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF METRO DETROIT: $100 → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $3k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN: $5k → 17%LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 10%MARLENE MEYERSON JCC MANHATTAN: $4k → 17%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN: $2k → 17%MARLENE MEYERSON JCC MANHATTAN: $2k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $48k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES: $30k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $25k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES: $16k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $15k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $15k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
AZ
NM
DC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 91 repeat orgs$368k to everyone else

91 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 73 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

91
68

Total granted

$4.0M
$347k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+33%

Still filing today

60%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthHuman ServicesInternationalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS
    7× · 2017–2024 · $187k · revenue +46%
  • MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DETROIT
    7× · 2017–2024 · $159k · revenue +0%
  • 7F
    70 FACES MEDIA INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $81k · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Michigangraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +140%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • AI
    ACCURACY IN MEDIA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $21k · revenue +504%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
4
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
5
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
6
The Jewish Women's Archive Inc

The jewish women's archive documents jewish women's stories, elevates their voices, and inspires them to be agents of change.jwa is dedicated to expanding and transforming the historical narrative by restoring jewish women and gender…

Arts & Culture
7
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
8
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
9
Sandler Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the…

Philanthropy
10
Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust

The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.

Arts & Culture
11
Jewish Childrens Museum

To further jewish historical education among youths

Arts & Culture
12
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

93 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 93 of the 169 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
90/93
Grantees still filing
59/93
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SANTA FE JEWISH CENTER - CHABAD INC: $720,000 · OtherSANTA FE JEWISH CENTER - CHABAD INCJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCI: $225,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCICHABAD LUBAVITCH OF MILL VALLEY: $199,000 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF MILL VALLEYTHE WOLFSONIAN - FIU: $197,000 · OtherTHE WOLFSONIAN - FIU+98 more: $1,154,657 · Other+98 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $755,100 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF D…JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $280,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDER…+3 more: $65,750 · Philanthropy+3 moreTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $186,665 · Arts & CultureTHE DETROIT INS…MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DETROIT: $159,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF CONTE…Jewish Film Institute: $150,000 · Arts & CultureJewish Film Ins…70 FACES MEDIA INC: $80,500 · Arts & Culture70 FACES MEDIA …ALGEMEINER INC: $42,500 · Arts & CultureALGEMEINER INCCABARET 313 INC: $32,750 · Arts & CultureTHE CONTEMPORARY JEWISH MUSEUM: $32,500 · Arts & Culture+16 more: $91,837 · Arts & Culture+16 moreAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $280,000 · InternationalAMERICAN IS…BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $250,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT …+5 more: $33,500 · International+5 moreJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $154,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $31,000 · Human ServicesBAY AREA FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $24,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $22,500 · Human ServicesINSTITUTE ON AGING: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $12,200 · Human Services+4 more: $10,225 · Human ServicesHorace Mann School: $48,500 · EducationBRANDEIS SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO: $46,800 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE JEWISH COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $35,000 · EducationJewish Commmunity High School of the Bay: $24,500 · EducationTHE BAY SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO: $23,500 · EducationCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY: $15,531 · EducationTHE QUAD PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $15,000 · EducationCOLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES: $14,100 · EducationSan Francisco Jewish Community Publications Inc: $12,500 · EducationJEAN AND SAMUEL FRANKEL JEWISH ACADEMY OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $11,000 · Education+2 more: $17,000 · EducationBARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE: $140,496 · HealthMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Health+8 more: $10,250 · Health
Other$2,495,657Philanthropy$1,100,850Arts & Culture$775,752International$563,500Human Services$269,425Education$263,431Health$158,246

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $755,100 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $280,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $280,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $186,665 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DETROIT: $159,000 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $154,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Film Institute: $150,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetBARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE: $140,496 over 9y, 0.2% of budget70 FACES MEDIA INC: $80,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetHorace Mann School: $48,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDEIS SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO: $46,800 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetALGEMEINER INC: $42,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $35,750 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE JEWISH COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $35,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetCABARET 313 INC: $32,750 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetTHE CONTEMPORARY JEWISH MUSEUM: $32,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $31,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH LEARNINGWORKS: $27,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $25,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBAY AREA FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $24,500 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetJewish Commmunity High School of the Bay: $24,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BAY SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO: $23,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetASPEN VALLEY LAND TRUST: $23,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $22,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetACCURACY IN MEDIA INC: $21,200 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetTHE DESSOFF CHOIRS INC: $20,500 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetGIANTS COMMUNITY FUND: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $17,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY: $15,531 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE ON AGING: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE QUAD PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES: $14,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT OPERA: $13,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetValue Culture: $12,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSan Francisco Jewish Community Publications Inc: $12,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $12,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEAN AND SAMUEL FRANKEL JEWISH ACADEMY OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetA WIDER BRIDGE: $10,300 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $10,075 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Center for Investigative Reporting Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIAMI BEACH POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetMENACHEM EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $8,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $8,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Film Institute ↗
  • Who funds BARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds 70 FACES MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Horace Mann School ↗
  • Who funds BRANDEIS SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds ALGEMEINER INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE JEWISH COMMUNITY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds CABARET 313 INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CONTEMPORARY JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH LEARNINGWORKS ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Fede…The Shimon Ben Joseph…Koret FoundationThe Eugene Applebaum …Lisa & Douglas Goldma…Jewish Federation of …The Scott J Seligman …Grosfeld FoundationWilliam Davidson Foun…United Jewish Foundat…The Andrea and Lawren…Marjorie and Maxwell …
Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA33.9× affinity17 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Koret Foundation · The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · Lisa & Douglas Goldman Fund · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Scott J Seligman Foundation · Grosfeld Foundation · William Davidson Foundation · United Jewish Foundation · The Andrea and Lawrence Wolfe Family Foundation · Marjorie and Maxwell Jospey Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Seligman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Seligman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Vizcaya Museum and Gardens Trust Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Bakehouse Art Complex Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
32report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Seligman Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Seligman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 169 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Seligman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home