· Private foundation
The Schwartz Rosman Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $125k
- $250k+1 grant · $359k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $359,000 |
| HARVARD WESTLAKE SCHOOL | $32,000 |
| CARECURE EPILEPSY FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN | $20,000 |
| CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER | $19,000 |
| THE IMPACT FORUM FOUNDATION | $13,600 |
| THE BOGGS SCHOOL | $10,800 |
| VALLEY BETH SHALOM | $10,000 |
| THE PUBLIC INTEREST NETWORK | $9,000 |
| TEMPLE ISRAEL OF HOLLYWOOD | $6,417 |
| JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCATION | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,000 |
| BUILDERS OF JEWISH EDUCATION | $3,900 |
| JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK | $2,499 |
| HIDE SEEK FOUNDATION | $1,800 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $218) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HSHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL9× · 2017–2025 · $159k · revenue +21%
CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER5× · 2021–2025 · $87k · revenue +31%- UOUniversity of Michigan5× · 2019–2025 · $71k · revenue +140%
Funded once
- BDBNAI DAVID -JUDEA CONGREGATIONone grant, 2024 · $40k
- BIBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
- CCCAFOUNDATION COMMERCE ED FUNDone grant, 2021 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.
The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…
The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…
To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…
Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…
San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.
The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.
The Jews of Color Initiatives mission is to advance racial equity in the U.S. Jewish community by centering the leadership of Jews of Color and ensuring that our communities and institutions reflect the multiracial reality of the Jewish…
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Board of Jewish Education Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Star Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Jumpstart Labs Inc DBA Jewish JUMPSTART JSLABS ↗
- Who funds HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds University of Michigan ↗
- Who funds BUREAU OF JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES INC ↗
- Who funds BOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds IMPACT FORUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CLIMATE RESOLVE ↗
- Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES CLEANTECH INCUBATOR ↗
- Who funds KATAHDIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC ↗
- Who funds BIG VISION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE STAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LA PROMISE FUND ↗
- Who funds LATINO U COLLEGE ACCESS INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds PHASE ONE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Annenberg Foundation · California Community Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Koret Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Schwartz Rosman Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.