Skip to content
The Schwartz Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Schwartz Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2026still arriving
2
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$4.0MHuman Services$800kCivil Rights$800kEducation$241kPublic Safety & Disaster$106kEnvironment$100kPhilanthropy$100kInternational$15kOther$0
02FY2026 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,143
Median grant
1
States reached
$115k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Bet Torah Foundation Inc$4,143
Mt Olivet Gospel Church$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $400k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Neighbors Link Corp: $400k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
2
Wmc-New York Inc

Wmc new york, inc. shall at all times be operated exclusively for charitable, scientific, and educational purposes within the meaning of section 170(c)(2)(b) and 501(c)(3) of the code, and for the purpose of engaging in various activities…

Health
3
Long Island Community Hospital At Nyu Langone Health

The goals and objectives of the corporation are as follows:(a) to operate and maintain a nonsectarian, general hospital at one or more locations for the furnishing of inpatient, ambulatory, restorative, preventative and emergency medical…

—
4
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
5
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
6
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
7
NewYork-PresbyterianLawrence Hospital

Newyork-presbyterian/lawrence hospital(nyp/lawrence) is an acute care hospital located in bronxville, new york. established over a century ago in 1909, nyp/lawrence has a long and important history providing superior healthcare to the…

—
8
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
9
The County Chamber of Commerce

The business council of westchester's mission is to work hard to grow the economy, create jobs and build a strong business community in westchester county.

—
10
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
11
New York Medical College

New york medical college (nymc), a member of touro university, is a health sciences college whose purpose is to educate clinical and public health professionals as well as researchers, to conduct biomedical and population-based research…

—
12
Lenox Hill Hospital Medical Pc

Lenox hill hospital medical, pc is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Westchester Community College Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Gift of Hope Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
6/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC: $3,000,000 · HealthNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC+1 more: $6,000 · HealthThe Northern Westchester Hospital Fdn: $984,375 · OtherThe Northern Westche…BEDFORD 2030 INC: $50,000 · Other+9 more: $102,957 · Other+9 moreNEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $800,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORS LINK…NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $800,000 · Civil RightsNAACP LEGAL DE…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $200,000 · EducationIONA UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · Education+1 more: $2,500 · EducationWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $100,000 · InternationalTHE GIFT OF HOPE USA INC: $15,000 · InternationalHOPEWELL FUND: $100,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Health$3,006,000Other$1,137,332Human Services$800,000Civil Rights$800,000Education$227,500International$115,000Philanthropy$101,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC: $3,000,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $800,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $800,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBEDFORD 2030 INC: $50,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetIONA UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWestchester Land Trust Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOLUMBIA LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE GIFT OF HOPE USA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetKATONAH VILLAGE LIBRARY: $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBEDFORD HILLS FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $12,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetBEDFORD RIDING LANES ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetKATONAH-BEDFORD HILLS VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORP: $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAUBURN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The New York Communit…Jewish Communal FundThe Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The New York Community TrustNY13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Schwartz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Schwartz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Schwartz Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home