Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Schultz-Hill Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$65kEducation$27kPhilanthropy$17kReligion$5kHuman Services$5kHealth$2kYouth Development$2kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VENICE THEATER$10,500
ATLANTIC CITY BOYS AND GIRLS$4,500
Individual grant recipient$3,500
STAFFORD PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$3,171
ATLANTIC CITY ARTS FOUNDATION$2,000
TARA MILLER MELANOMA FOUNDATION$1,600
HIGHLAND CHILDREN'S ACADEMY$1,500
MUDGIRLS STUDIO$1,500
OCEAN CITY THEATER COMPANY$1,500
HISTORIC COLD SPRING VILLAGE$1,500
ATLANTIC CITY THEATER COMPANY$1,500
SAVE LUCY COMMITTEE$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,250
VENICE SYMPHONY$1,000
HOLY SPIRIT MUSIC PROGRAM$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%GILDA'S CLUB OF SOUTH JERSEY: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$84k · 22 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
33

Total granted

$84k
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+17%

Still filing today

32%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEmploymentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Atlantic City Arts Foundation
    8× · 2018–2025 · $9k · revenue +54%
  • OC
    OCEAN CITY THEATRE COMPANY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $5k · revenue +2%
  • CHICKEN BONE BEACH HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $3k · revenue +367%

Funded once

  • SO
    SARASOTA OPERA COMPANY
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • A4
    ACH - 48 BLOCKS SOCIETY
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • VL
    VANESSA LEIGH-ANN DE JEAD
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sussex County Arts & Heritage Counc

Local arts development

Arts & Culture
2
Central Jersey Arts Council Inc

To promote arts, cultural programs and events.

Arts & Culture
3
Hackensack Performing Arts Center Inc

Community arts and education

Arts & Culture
4
Ocean City Arts Center

The mission of the organization is to enrich the individuals and communities of southern new jersey by connecting those with interest in creative, performing and visual arts.

Arts & Culture
5
Blue Curtain a Nj NonProfit Corporation

Entertainment

Arts & Culture
6
Toms River Seaport Society

Public museum

—
7
Guttenberg Arts a Nj Nonprofit Corp
Arts & Culture
8
Atlantic Arts Foundation
—
9
Jersey City Ballet Theater

Ballet theater

—
10
Theater Collaborative of South Jersey

To enhance the quality of life in the region by providing affordable theatre for residents and visitors of all ages. Through these efforts, the Collaborative will contribute to the Bay Avenue Districts economy, identity, cultural heritage…

Philanthropy
11
Atlantic Highlands Historical Society

Historical preservation of atlantic higlands

—
12
Atlantic County Spca

To prevent cruelty and neglect of animals; to provide low cost spay/nueter services; to educate the public

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of New Jersey; the most unlike its peers is Tara Miller Melanoma Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SARASOTA OPERA COMPANY: $25,000 · OtherSARASOTA OPERA COMPANYATLANTICARE FOUNDATION: $12,500 · OtherATLANTICARE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $8,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $6,500 · OtherHOLY SPIRIT HIGH SCHOOL: $5,250 · Other+61 more: $89,691 · Other+61 moreVENICE THEATRE INC: $10,500 · Arts & CultureVENICE THEATRE IN…Atlantic City Arts Foundation: $9,200 · Arts & CultureAtlantic City Art…OCEAN CITY THEATRE COMPANY: $4,500 · Arts & CultureOCEAN CITY THEATR…CHICKEN BONE BEACH HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureCHICKEN BONE BEAC…THE VENICE SYMPHONY INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureATLANTIC CITY BOARDWALK HOLOCOST MEMORIAL INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $350 · Arts & CultureMud Girls Studios a NJ non profit Corporation: $4,000 · EmploymentCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY: $2,500 · PhilanthropyHANSEN FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyMIGHTY WRITERS: $2,500 · EducationTARA MILLER MELANOMA FOUNDATION: $1,600 · HealthSOUTH JERSEY AGAINST AIDS INC DBA SOUTH JERSEY AIDS ALLIANCE: $500 · HealthGILDA'S CLUB SOUTH JERSEY INC: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$147,441Arts & Culture$29,550Employment$4,000Philanthropy$3,500Education$2,500Health$2,100Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAtlantic City Arts Foundation: $9,200 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetBAY-ATLANTIC SYMPHONY: $4,550 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetOCEAN CITY THEATRE COMPANY: $4,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMud Girls Studios a NJ non profit Corporation: $4,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHICKEN BONE BEACH HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetMIGHTY WRITERS: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VENICE SYMPHONY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLAND ACADEMY II: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHANSEN FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH JERSEY AGAINST AIDS INC DBA SOUTH JERSEY AIDS ALLIANCE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTIC CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHISTORIC ORGAN RESTORATION COMMITTEE INC: $350 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VENICE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds Atlantic City Arts Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BAY-ATLANTIC SYMPHONY ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CITY THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds Mud Girls Studios a NJ non profit Corporation ↗
  • Who funds CHICKEN BONE BEACH HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MIGHTY WRITERS ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds TARA MILLER MELANOMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAVE LUCY COMMITTEE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oceanfirst FoundationNJ19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oceanfirst Foundation · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Schultz-Hill Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Schultz-Hill Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 25%
  • Hansen Foundation Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Bay-Atlantic Symphony: 16% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Schultz-Hill Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Schultz-Hill Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Schultz-Hill’s filings →

More from the funding graph