Skip to content
The Schuble Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Schuble Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$218kReligion$59kEducation$50kPhilanthropy$17kArts & Culture$14kHuman Services$11kYouth Development$10k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$378k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH$5,000
THE CHILDREN'S INN AT NIH$5,000
WASHINGTON HEBREW CONGREGATION$5,000
OCEAN REEF MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$2,500
OCEAN REEF CHAPEL FOUNDATION INC$2,000
YELLOW RIBBON FUND$2,000
KEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$1,800
CONGREGATION OCEAN REEF$1,800
BREAST CARE FOR WASHINGTON$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CLOTHING OUR KIDS: $5k → 10%JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES: $500 → 8%JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES: $500 → 8%KEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%KEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%KEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%KEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%KEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%KEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$305k · 13 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$305k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+38%

Still filing today

85%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MEDSTAR HEALTH INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $100k · revenue +54%
  • BF
    BREM FOUNDATION TO DEFEAT BREAST CANCER
    2× · 2022–2023 · $40k · revenue +40%
  • OR
    OCEAN REEF CHAPEL FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $27k · revenue +226%

Funded once

  • BS
    BULLIS SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +38%
  • CO
    Clothing Our Kids Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +31%
  • J
    JFGH
    one grant, 2020 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
2
Children's Research Institute

Children's research institute dba children's national research institute conducts and promotes translational and clinical medical research and education programs that lead to improved understanding, prevention, treatment, and care of…

Health
3
University of Maryland Medical System Corporation

Umms provides a variety of inpatient/outpatient services to people in the maryland area regardless of their ability to pay. revenues are used to help defray the costs of services.

Health
4
Washington Hospital Center Corporation

See schedule oas a proud member of medstar health, medstar washington hospital center's (mwhc) mission is to deliver exceptional patient-first health care and an exceptional patient experience. mwhc is renowned for handling the region's…

Health
5
The Medstar-Georgetown Medical Center Inc

See schedule oas a proud member of medstar health, medstar georgetown university hospital's (medstar georgetown) mission is to provide physical and spiritual comfort to our patients and their families in the jesuit tradition of cura…

Health
6
National Foundation for Cancer Research

To support cancer research and public education relating to prevention, earlier diagnosis, better treatments and ultimately, a cure for cancer.

Health
7
The Coral Reef and Marine Science Foundation Inc C/O James Bildner
—
8
Gbmc Foundation Inc

The foundation is organized and operated exclusively as a nonprofit charitable organization, within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code, to raise, receive, and administer funds for the benefit of gbmc healthcare,…

Health
9
Greater Baltimore Medical Center Inc

The mission of gbmc is to provide medical care and service of the highest quality to each patient and to educate the next generation of clinicians, leading to health, healing and hope for the community. our vision: to every patient, every…

Health
10
Children's Hospital

Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…

Health
11
Medstar Health Research Institute Inc

See schedule omedstar health research institute is dedicated to supporting the academic platform of medstar health by conducting high quality translational and health sciences research throughout the medstar system.

—
12
National Rehabilitation Hospital

See schedule oas a proud member of medstar health, medstar national rehabilitation network's (medstar nrn) mission is to serve the community as a regional and national leader in rehabilitative services through quality patient care,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Washington Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is National Jewish Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEDSTAR HEALTH INC: $100,000 · HealthMEDSTAR HEALTH INCBREM FOUNDATION TO DEFEAT BREAST CANCER: $40,000 · HealthBREM FOUNDATION TO DEFEAT BREAST CANCERNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $40,000 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTHCHILDREN'S INN AT NIH INC: $15,500 · HealthCHILDREN'S INN AT NIH INC+1 more: $6,500 · HealthOCEAN REEF CHAPEL FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 · OtherOCEAN REEF CHAPEL FOUN…WASHINGTON HEBREW CONGREGATION: $26,695 · OtherWASHINGTON HEBREW CONG…OCEAN REEF MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $15,500 · OtherOCEAN REEF MEDICAL CEN…CONGREGATION OCEAN REEF INC: $5,400 · OtherCONGREGATION OCEAN REE…+2 more: $1,000 · OtherBULLIS SCHOOL: $50,000 · EducationBULLIS SCHOOLOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $9,300 · PhilanthropyGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7,500 · PhilanthropyYELLOW RIBBON FUND INC: $4,000 · PhilanthropyKEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $9,775 · Human ServicesClothing Our Kids Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesOCEAN REEF CULTURAL CENTER INC: $14,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$202,000Other$75,595Education$50,000Philanthropy$20,800Human Services$15,775Arts & Culture$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDSTAR HEALTH INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBULLIS SCHOOL: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREM FOUNDATION TO DEFEAT BREAST CANCER: $40,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN REEF CHAPEL FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S INN AT NIH INC: $15,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN REEF MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $15,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN REEF CULTURAL CENTER INC: $14,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $9,775 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $9,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAST CARE FOR WASHINGTON: $6,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetClothing Our Kids Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetYELLOW RIBBON FUND INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Isenberg Family Found…The John H and Kather…Paul W Dimaura Charit…The Holmes Family Fou…George and Ruth Harms…Vinton Family Foundat…The Hajim Family Foun…C Hamilton Sloan Foun…Kitchings Family Foun…Alben F & Clara G Bat…The Jewish Federation…American Endowment Fo…
Isenberg Family FoundationPA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Isenberg Family Foundation · The John H and Katherine J Weiland Foundation Inc · Paul W Dimaura Charitable Trust Attn Edward F Fay Esq · The Holmes Family Foundation Inc · George and Ruth Harms Foundation · Vinton Family Foundation · The Hajim Family Foundation · C Hamilton Sloan Foundation · Kitchings Family Foundation · Alben F & Clara G Bates Foundation · The Jewish Federation of Greater Washington Inc · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Schuble Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Schuble Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Medstar Health Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Children's Inn at Nih Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Yellow Ribbon Fund Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Schuble Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home