Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Schievelbein Family Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$89k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$266kHealth$221kArts & Culture$149kReligion$81kCrime & Legal$71kEducation$54kEnvironment$26kHuman Services$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$40,000
WAYWORD INC (A WAY WITH WORDS)$15,000
HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION$10,000
VOICES FOR CHILDREN$5,000
AMERICAN JUNIOR GOLF ASSOCIATION INC$5,000
OCEAN REEF CHAPEL FOUNDATION INC$5,000
THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION$5,000
WASHINGTON TENNIS & EDUCATION FOUNDATION$2,000
OCEAN REEF MEDICAL FOUNDATION$1,000
KEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC$600
OPEN DOOR HEALTH CENTER$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%FAMILIES OF THE WOUNDED FUND: $500 → 7%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%KEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $600 → 13%THE KEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $500 → 13%THE KEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $500 → 13%KEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
NY
OR
OH
CA
VA
MD
NM
NC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$507k · 19 repeat orgs$153k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
22

Total granted

$507k
$148k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+16%

Still filing today

63%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +183%
  • WI
    Wayword Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $45k · revenue +4%
  • VF
    VOICES FOR CHILDREN
    2× · 2021–2022 · $30k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • MC
    MAYO CLINIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • CF
    Center for Institutional Courage Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -64%
  • OR
    OCEAN REEF CULTURAL CENTER INC
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
3
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
4
Sea Research Foundation Inc

To inspire people to care for and protect our ocean planet through education and research.

Animals
5
Alaska Whale Foundation

Alaska Whale Foundation is dedicated to marine mammal conservation through research monitoring and education.

Environment
6
Moral Compass Federation Inc

Moral compass federation facilitates collaboration among multiple veteran-led nonprofit organizations, individuals, and businesses who came together during the fall of kabul, afghanistan to evacuate and resettle afghan allies who were in…

Public Benefit
7
Captains for Clean Water Inc

To advance education, awareness, and scientifically supported solutions to restore and protect marine ecosystems and our way of life for future generations.

Environment
8
Foundation of the Arc of the United States

To promote, support and further the interests and purposes of the arc of the united states, inc.

—
9
Marine Corps Association Foundation

To provide resources and support to sustain and expand programs and activities essential to the marine corps association's (mca) mission by engaging everyone inspired by the marine corps.

Arts & Culture
10
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
11
Reef Check Foundation

Leading Citizen scientists to promote stewardship of sustainable reef communities worldwide.

Environment
12
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ocean Reef Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wayword Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
22/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OCEAN REEF MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $79,575 · OtherOCEAN REEF MEDICAL FOUNDATIONBAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherBAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATIONOCEAN REEF CULTURAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherOCEAN REEF CULTURAL CENTER FOUNDATIONWAY WITH WORDS: $35,000 · OtherWAY WITH WORDSTHE PROTESTANT CONGREGATION OF OCEAN REEF INC: $25,000 · OtherTHE PROTESTANT CONGREGATION OF OCEAN REEF INCMAYO CLINIC FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherMAYO CLINIC FOUNDATIONSurvJustice Inc: $20,000 · OtherOCEAN REEF CHAPEL FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 · Other+21 more: $103,825 · Other+21 moreOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $266,015 · PhilanthropyOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION …+1 more: $2,500 · PhilanthropyWayword Inc: $45,000 · Arts & CultureWayword I…OCEAN REEF CULTURAL CENTER INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureOCEAN REE…WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $15,000 · Arts & CultureWOLF TRAP…HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesKEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $2,100 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesCenter for Institutional Courage Inc: $25,000 · EducationUS NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · EducationNAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · EducationVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $30,000 · Civil RightsTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 · EnvironmentCAPITAL TREES: $5,000 · Environment
Other$426,400Philanthropy$268,515Arts & Culture$80,000Human Services$52,600Education$42,500Civil Rights$30,000Environment$26,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $266,015 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWayword Inc: $45,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCenter for Institutional Courage Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN REEF CULTURAL CENTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOCEAN REEF CHAPEL FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetWOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUS NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON TENNIS & EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $12,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetVoice for Children Inc AKA Voices for Children of Florida: $10,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetFOREVER BALBOA PARK: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN): $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAPITAL TREES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE MEDICAL CENTER AT OCEAN REEF INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUDT - SEAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC: $3,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYELLOW RIBBON FUND INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $2,100 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOPEN DOOR HEALTH CENTER: $725 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES OF THE WOUNDED FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget24 Foundation Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John a & Marlene L Boll FoundationMI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John a & Marlene L Boll Foundation · The Holmes Family Foundation Inc · George and Ruth Harms Foundation · Ocean Reef Community Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Schievelbein Family Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Schievelbein Family Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Yellow Ribbon Fund Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Schievelbein Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph