Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Samuel and Justina Halley Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$84k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$319kHealth$86kHuman Services$83kRecreation & Sports$26kEducation$16kMembership Benefit$12kInternational$11kCommunity Improvement$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $56k
$4,609
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$15,472
Individual grant recipient$10,710
BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP FOUNDATION$10,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI$10,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF HIGHLANDS COUNTY$10,000
SNUGGLE PET RESCUE$8,000
DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION$5,000
FIVE ACRES ANIMAL SHELTER$4,609
ROTARY FOUNDATION$2,000
MEHLVILLE LION'S CLUB$1,900
KIRK CARE FOOD PANTRY$1,500
CLAIRE'S HOUSE$1,300
KIWANIS INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION$1,256
AMERICAN LEGION POST 156$1,000
FENTON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%OUR LADY'S INN: $1k → 11%OUR LADY'S INN: $580 → 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $500 → 21%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $500 → 21%MID-EAST AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $2k → 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $1k → 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $1k → 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$527k · 24 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
28

Total granted

$527k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+26%

Still filing today

50%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthEducationPublic BenefitEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI
    5× · 2017–2024 · $100k · revenue +56%
  • FA
    FIVE ACRES ANIMAL SHELTER
    4× · 2019–2024 · $17k · revenue +19%
  • V
    VOYCE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $11k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • AA
    ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • TB
    THE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -19%
  • DF
    DREAMER FUND INC
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stray Rescue of St Louis

To rescue stray animals in need of medical attention, restore them to health, and place them in homes.

Animals
2
Forever Loved Pet Sanctuary

To save senior dogs who are often overlooked by providing them the opportunity to thrive in a safe and caring environment.

Animals
3
Stray Paws Rescue

Our organization believes it is our moral responsibility to protect and improve the lives of rescued animals and place them in loving permanent homes in st. louis metro.

Animals
4
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
5
Danbury Animal Welfare Society

Danbury animal welfare society , inc.(daws) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the lives of animals in our community and beyond. we promote responsible pet guardianship and the humane treatment of animals, and work toward…

Animals
6
Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland

The Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland nurtures the connection between people and pets to advance animal welfare and improve the quality of life in our community.

Animals
7
Humane Society of Southwest Missouri

The humane society of southwest missouri is one of the largest open admission, no kill shelters in southwest missouri. it is dedicated to helping sick, injured and abandoned dogs and cats find their forever homes. for over 60 years the…

Animals
8
Spokane Humane Society

The vision of Spokane Humane Society is to enrich the lives of animals and their companions through Support, Education, Advocacy and Love (SEAL). As the oldest local non-profit in Spokane, we have been serving companion animals in need and…

Animals
9
Tulsa Spca

The Tulsa SPCA's mission is to improve the lives of dogs and cats, and their human companions.

Animals
10
Animal Samaritans

At Animal Samaritans we champion compassion and respect for all living creatures, with a primary focus on dogs, cats, and the people who love them. We view pets not merely as animals, but as members of our families. As their guardians and…

Animals
11
Kansas City Pet Project

Leading the way in creating a compassionate, safe community for pets and people through progressive lifesaving programs and services, community resources, and educational opportunities.

Animals
12
Felines Inc

Providing a safe and loving shelter to cats and dogs until their permanent adoptive home is found.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wildlife Rescue Center; the most unlike its peers is Kirkwood Theatre Guild. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $101,623 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBETHESDA LEGACY SOCIETY: $44,000 · OtherBETHESDA LEGACY SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $27,860 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherAMERICAN LEGION POST 156: $11,630 · Other+39 more: $132,665 · Other+39 moreHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $100,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURISnuggle Pet Rescue: $64,000 · AnimalsSnuggle Pet RescueFIVE ACRES ANIMAL SHELTER: $16,609 · AnimalsFIVE ACRES ANIMAL SHELTERCLOWDER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $16,500 · AnimalsCLOWDER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $4,500 · AnimalsBETHESDA HEALTH GROUP FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $11,190 · InternationalPEDAL THE CAUSE: $4,000 · Human ServicesOUR LADYS INN: $1,730 · Human ServicesAGING AHEAD FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Human ServicesForest Park Forever Inc: $2,000 · EnvironmentDogs For Our Brave Inc: $1,000 · Public BenefitCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Public Benefit
Other$330,278Animals$201,609Health$41,000International$11,190Human Services$7,230Environment$2,000Public Benefit$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $100,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSnuggle Pet Rescue: $64,000 over 7y, 16% of budgetBETHESDA HEALTH GROUP FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFIVE ACRES ANIMAL SHELTER: $16,609 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCLOWDER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $16,500 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $11,190 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVOYCE: $10,840 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ST LOUIS: $10,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetOPEN DOOR ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $4,655 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWildlife Rescue Center: $4,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPEDAL THE CAUSE: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetForest Park Forever Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFENTON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $1,747 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOUR LADYS INN: $1,730 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLINDBERGH SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $1,160 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEQUINE-ASSISTED THERAPY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDogs For Our Brave Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANTERBURY ENTERPRISES INC: $700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIRKWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds Snuggle Pet Rescue ↗
  • Who funds BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FIVE ACRES ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds CLOWDER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds VOYCE ↗
  • Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds Wildlife Rescue Center ↗
  • Who funds PEDAL THE CAUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds Forest Park Forever Inc ↗
  • Who funds KIRKWOOD THEATRE GUILD ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FENTON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds OUR LADYS INN ↗
  • Who funds AGING AHEAD FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community FoundationMO23.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · Richard a Baker Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · The Robert E Jones Foundation · The E Walter Hausstette Charitable Foundation C/O Mike Moloney Big Sky · Dotopia · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Samuel and Justina Halley Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Samuel and Justina Halley Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Samuel and Justina Halley Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Samuel and Justina Halley Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Samuel and Justina Halley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph