Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sample Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$132kHuman Services$44kArts & Culture$31kAnimals$29kEnvironment$18kHealth$14kHousing & Shelter$6kEducation$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $37k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$897k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARK'S CATHEDRAL$15,000
SHREVEPORT GARDEN STUDY CLUB$11,700
ST MARK'S RECOTR'S FUND$10,000
SHREVEPORT REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL$2,800
CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING$2,000
BONEFISH & TARPON TRUST$1,000
PORT CITY CAT RESCUE$1,000
WIDEMAN INTERNATIONAL PIANO COMPETITION INC$1,000
THE GENERALS REDOUBT$1,000
YMCA OF NW LOUISIANA$1,000
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICAN NORTH LA$1,000
AMERICAN BATTLEFIELD TRUST$1,000
WERLA - WILDLIFE REHABEDUCATION OF LA$1,000
DUCKS UNLIMITED$1,000
DAWN REDWOODS CHARITABLE TRUST$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $3k → 22%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $3k → 22%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $3k → 22%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $3k → 22%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $2k → 22%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $2k → 22%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 22%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
CA
WV
VA
TN
DC
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$266k · 30 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
11

Total granted

$266k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+16%

Still filing today

43%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING
    8× · 2018–2025 · $17k · revenue +77%
  • RR
    ROBINSONS RESCUE INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $8k · revenue +47%
  • TD
    THE DAWN REDWOODS CHARITABLE TRUST
    8× · 2018–2025 · $8k · revenue +194%

Funded once

  • RL
    ROSS LYNN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +16%
  • US
    UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -15%
  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF NWLA
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Orleans Geological Society Memorial Foundation
Education
2
Lsu Research Foundation
Community Improvement
3
Lsu Health Sciences Foundation in Shreveport

The sole mission of the foundation is to support, enhance and assist the lsu health sciences center at shreveport in its many endeavors.

Philanthropy
4
Lsu Health Sciences Building Foundation in Shreveport

All functions of the foundation are dedicated to supporting lsu health sciences center at shreveport.

Education
5
Coalition to Restore Coastal Louisiana

The mission of the coalition to restore coastal louisiana (crcl) is to unite people in action to achieve a thriving, sustainable louisiana coast for all.

Environment
6
Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership Inc

To guarantee all americans quality places to hunt and fish.

Animals
7
Baton Rouge Blues Festival & Foundation

The baton rouge blues foundation is a non-profit organization striving to promote, preserve and celebrate the baton rouge blues culture and bring the best of louisiana swamp blues music to the world.

Arts & Culture
8
Ouachita Mountains Biological Station
Environment
9
Laura Center for Creole Heritage
Arts & Culture
10
University of New Orleans Research and Technology Foundation Inc

-To support any and all programs, facilities, research, and educational opportunities offered by the University of New Orleans and the University of Louisiana System.-To encourage teaching, research, scholarship, and services, and increase…

Health
11
Red Skelton Museum Foundation Inc

The red skelton museum was formed for the collection,preservation of the materials and personal items of red skelton, the entertainer along with the educational history of mr. skelton. events and fundraisers along with a gift shop provide…

Arts & Culture
12
Audubon Nature Institute Inc

Operation of museums and parks dedicated to nature on behalf of the City of New Orleans.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Northwest Louisiana; the most unlike its peers is Fisheries Conservation Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARK'S CATHEDRAL: $87,640 · OtherST MARK'S CATHEDRALST MARK'S RECOTR'S FUND: $43,050 · OtherST MARK'S RECOTR'S FUNDVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICAN NORTH LA: $11,275 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $10,500 · OtherCOUNCIL ON DRUG & ALCOHOL ABUSE: $9,000 · OtherWERLA - WILDLIFE REHABEDUCATION OF LA: $8,000 · OtherTHE DAWN REDWOODS CHARITABLE TRUST: $8,000 · Other+20 more: $36,440 · Other+20 moreCADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $16,575 · Human ServicesROSS LYNN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $3,499 · Human ServicesROBINSONS RESCUE INC: $8,381 · AnimalsBONEFISH & TARPON TRUST INC: $5,000 · AnimalsFISHERIES CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 · AnimalsPort City Cat Rescue: $2,500 · AnimalsTHE GENERALS REDOUBT: $6,500 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,288 · Arts & CultureSHREVEPORT REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL: $2,800 · Arts & CultureAmerican Battlefield Trust: $2,000 · Arts & CultureWideman Piano Competition Inc aka Wideman Piano Competition: $2,000 · Arts & CultureTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureSHREVEPORT GARDEN STUDY CLUB: $11,700 · EnvironmentShreveport Bossier Rescue Mission: $6,000 · Housing & ShelterUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION: $2,500 · EducationWashington and Lee University: $1,000 · EducationWOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL: $150 · Education
Other$213,905Human Services$20,074Animals$19,381Arts & Culture$18,588Environment$11,700Housing & Shelter$6,000Education$3,650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $16,575 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetROBINSONS RESCUE INC: $8,381 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DAWN REDWOODS CHARITABLE TRUST: $8,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE GENERALS REDOUBT: $6,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetShreveport Bossier Rescue Mission: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBONEFISH & TARPON TRUST INC: $5,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFISHERIES CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetROSS LYNN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $3,499 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,288 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHREVEPORT REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL: $2,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPort City Cat Rescue: $2,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST LOUISIANA: $2,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Battlefield Trust: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWideman Piano Competition Inc aka Wideman Piano Competition: $2,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOUISIANA NAVAL WAR MEMORIAL COMMISSION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWashington and Lee University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds SHREVEPORT GARDEN STUDY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds ROBINSONS RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DAWN REDWOODS CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE GENERALS REDOUBT ↗
  • Who funds Shreveport Bossier Rescue Mission ↗
  • Who funds BONEFISH & TARPON TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds FISHERIES CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSS LYNN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHREVEPORT REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Port City Cat Rescue ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST LOUISIANA ↗
  • Who funds American Battlefield Trust ↗
  • Who funds Wideman Piano Competition Inc aka Wideman Piano Competition ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA NAVAL WAR MEMORIAL COMMISSION ↗
  • Who funds Washington and Lee University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North LouisianaLA22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Louisiana · H E Storer Charitable Foundation · Wheless Foundation · The Crow Foundation · The Alta and John Franks Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sample Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sample Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sample’s filings →

    More from the funding graph