Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Saluto Foundation CO Kimberly S DeLapa

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$166kHealth$122kHuman Services$79kEducation$32kInternational$19kReligion$16kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Father Joe's Villages$5,000
The Art of Elysium$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Undue Medical Debt: $1k → 13%Charity Navigator: $500 → 7%Charity Navigator: $250 → 7%ThornDigital Defenders of Children: $1k → 14%GenerateHope: $2k → 11%San Diego Center for Children: $500 → 11%San Diego Center for Children: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
MA
IA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
NC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$395k · 20 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +86% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
21

Total granted

$395k
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
0%

Still filing today

50%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationInternationalReligionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $164k · revenue +124%
  • SH
    SCRIPPS HEALTH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $37k · revenue +82%
  • IR
    INTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS
    5× · 2017–2021 · $16k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue +26%
  • CF
    Center for Persons w Disablities
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • SV
    St Vincent DePaul
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
2
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
3
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

—
4
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
5
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
6
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
7
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
8
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
9
Northern California Institute for Research and Education Inc

To improve the health and well-being of veterans and the general public by supporting a world-class biomedical research program conducted by ucsf faculty at the san francisco veterans affairs health care system.

Health
10
Techbridge Inc

Techbridge breaks the cycle of generational poverty through the innovative use of technology to transform nonprofit and community impact. techbridge's work is focused on four pillars: hunger relief, homeless support, social justice and…

Philanthropy
11
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
12
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Diego Center for Children; the most unlike its peers is Scripps Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Rady's Children's Hospital Foundati: $50,500 · OtherRady's Children's Hospital FoundatiMSU Center For Persons with Disabil: $35,500 · OtherMSU Center For Persons with DisabilFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $9,500 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INCSt Therese of Carmel Valley: $8,500 · OtherCenter for Persons w Disablities: $7,500 · OtherPedal the Cause-American Cancer: $6,100 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · Other+17 more: $51,060 · Other+17 moreST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $163,648 · ReligionST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INCSCRIPPS HEALTH: $36,500 · HealthSCRIPPS HEALTHCUREBOUND: $12,000 · HealthCUREBOUNDTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · HealthTHE MULTIPLE M…CHAI LIFELINE INC: $2,500 · HealthSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $12,250 · EducationCRISTO REY SAN DIEGO HIGH SCHOOL INC: $10,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS: $15,500 · International+1 more: $511 · InternationalAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,000 · Human ServicesGENERATEHOPE INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $1,250 · Human ServicesTHORN: $1,250 · Human ServicesSAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 · Human ServicesCharity Navigator: $750 · Human ServicesTHE ART OF ELYSIUM: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$174,660Religion$163,648Health$58,500Education$26,250International$16,011Human Services$9,250Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $163,648 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH: $36,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS: $15,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $12,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCUREBOUND: $12,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCRISTO REY SAN DIEGO HIGH SCHOOL INC: $10,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGENERATEHOPE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHORN: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $511 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK GIRLS CODE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds SCRIPPS HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CUREBOUND ↗
  • Who funds CRISTO REY SAN DIEGO HIGH SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds GENERATEHOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC ↗
  • Who funds THORN ↗
  • Who funds THE ART OF ELYSIUM ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Charity Navigator ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLACK GIRLS CODE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Saluto Foundation CO Kimberly S DeLapa funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Saluto Foundation CO Kimberly S DeLapa. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Saluto Foundation CO Kimberly S DeLapa’s filings →

More from the funding graph